Jump to content

Why do feminists accuse house duties as "being domesticated" , but conveniently think of men as ATM ?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Sat1 said:

No, you are wrong.
 

I’m not speaking to you with regards to this topic anymore because you seem to be extremely prejudiced, and there’s no point. 

No, you're wrong. ?

"extremely prejudiced" = presenting information that contradicts your narrative. That makes me evil. 

Women! ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sat1 said:

“A woman doesn’t want to win, she wants a winner”- your words

I’m open to learning new things and to other people’s opinions, but this one is truly so sexist. Maybe some women don’t want to win, I don’t know, but I know that some do want to win. 

How is it sexist?

Do you actually know what is meant by this?

Is it sexist because you do not what it means or is it some unflattering truth you are unwilling to accept?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

How is it sexist?

Do you actually know what is meant by this?

Is it sexist because you do not what it means or is it some unflattering truth you are unwilling to accept?

If Sat is telling you not all women fall under the assumptions that you are making and is clearly offended... then why are you arguing back? Clearly she doesn’t fall under your generalisations, I definitely do not either. You come across like you have a problem with women and authority? I think I read before that your mother believes marrying a girl who stops her education at 16 is best which is an extremely odd and random opinion to have. Have you had a very negative experience with a woman?


This isn’t 1995, it’s 2020. Where I come from, women don’t go to uni thinking about what man they can get as a result of studying, that’s last thing on an 18year olds mind ?. It also doesn’t mean a woman must be desperate if she marries someone who makes less money than her. Have you conducted some research into the female brain? I doubt it. Perhaps you have experienced girls like this.... perhaps it’s due to sociological factors, eg are you from a low wealth area?  Whether it’s arranged or love, people don’t meet and ask ‘right so how much are you on?’ Someone may say ‘I work in finance’... it could be on 20k or 60k, no one discusses figures. Once you have fallen for someone, you’ve fallen. That’s it. 

I hope you change the way you think of females if you’re ever blessed to have a daughter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, learningkaur said:

If Sat is telling you not all women fall under the assumptions that you are making and is clearly offended... then why are you arguing back? Clearly she doesn’t fall under your generalisations, I definitely do not either. You come across like you have a problem with women and authority? I think I read before that your mother believes marrying a girl who stops her education at 16 is best which is an extremely odd and random opinion to have. Have you had a very negative experience with a woman?


This isn’t 1995, it’s 2020. Where I come from, women don’t go to uni thinking about what man they can get as a result of studying, that’s last thing on an 18year olds mind ?. It also doesn’t mean a woman must be desperate if she marries someone who makes less money than her. Have you conducted some research into the female brain? I doubt it. Perhaps you have experienced girls like this.... perhaps it’s due to sociological factors, eg are you from a low wealth area?  Whether it’s arranged or love, people don’t meet and ask ‘right so how much are you on?’ Someone may say ‘I work in finance’... it could be on 20k or 60k, no one discusses figures. Once you have fallen for someone, you’ve fallen. That’s it. 

I hope you change the way you think of females if you’re ever blessed to have a daughter. 

Please don't use this "if you are bless to have a daughter" because this is putting women on a pedestal. 

The reality is that there are truths whether you like them or not.

I would not like my daughter to dump some decent hard working guy for a richer guy just because he had more money and getting a higher status.

But I know that when my daughter gets married she will look into how much the guy makes, what profession he is in, will her status increase, does he have his own house, does he make more than her. 

Please don't say this particular feature does not exist in a women's nature. Just because you may not act upon it does not mean it doesn't exist.

I could bring you example after example said out of woman's mouth and her actions that someone can connect the dots.

There a truths (unflattering) about men's nature which I don't find it offensive. Now should I say "I would should be blessed to have a son".

Here is a reality about men's nature. There is part of men's nature that if a man could he would have unlimited sexual access to as many women as possible. The reality is that this is not possible for the majority of men. 90 per cent of men at least this is impossible. 

Here is another uncomfortable  reality,  you have more female ancestors than male ancestors and you know why? 

Because throughout human history, human's were never monogamous. 80 percent of men never bred with women because 20 percent of the top tier had access to all the women. Women sexually selected top tier men to have kids with. They shared their men with other women and they preferred that to having a low status man.

That is how the institution of marriage came about with one woman to one man.

There are truths about muslims nature which on another thread which a muslim probably finds offensive. We don't bat an eyelid because we know it is the truth.

It is 2020, equality does not mean putting women on a pedestal. You want privilege.

You are also displaying a behaviour as well that my bhuas directly from their mouths have told me which is unflattering about women and that is they never like to admit to their foibles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use