Why do feminists accuse house duties as "being domesticated" , but conveniently think of men as ATM ?

[MisterrSingh]

6 hours ago, learningkaur said:

Someone may say ‘I work in finance’... 

Someone may be a money launderer. Hey, that is technically working in finance! 

[Sat1]

On 7/7/2020 at 10:08 PM, Ranjeet01 said:

[Sat1]

On 7/6/2020 at 11:48 PM, Sat1 said:

23 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Please don't use this "if you are bless to have a daughter" because this is putting women on a pedestal. 

The reality is that there are truths whether you like them or not.

I would not like my daughter to dump some decent hard working guy for a richer guy just because he had more money and getting a higher status.

But I know that when my daughter gets married she will look into how much the guy makes, what profession he is in, will her status increase, does he have his own house, does he make more than her. 

Please don't say this particular feature does not exist in a women's nature. Just because you may not act upon it does not mean it doesn't exist.

I could bring you example after example said out of woman's mouth and her actions that someone can connect the dots.

There a truths (unflattering) about men's nature which I don't find it offensive. Now should I say "I would should be blessed to have a son".

Here is a reality about men's nature. There is part of men's nature that if a man could he would have unlimited sexual access to as many women as possible. The reality is that this is not possible for the majority of men. 90 per cent of men at least this is impossible. 

Here is another uncomfortable  reality,  you have more female ancestors than male ancestors and you know why? 

Because throughout human history, human's were never monogamous. 80 percent of men never bred with women because 20 percent of the top tier had access to all the women. Women sexually selected top tier men to have kids with. They shared their men with other women and they preferred that to having a low status man.

That is how the institution of marriage came about with one woman to one man.

There are truths about muslims nature which on another thread which a muslim probably finds offensive. We don't bat an eyelid because we know it is the truth.

It is 2020, equality does not mean putting women on a pedestal. You want privilege.

You are also displaying a behaviour as well that my bhuas directly from their mouths have told me which is unflattering about women and that is they never like to admit to their foibles. 

“A woman doesn’t want to win, she wants a winner”
 

She doesn’t want privilege, she doesn’t want a human being disrespected and the above being said so have some respect. 
 

With your above comment you disrespect hard working women, successful women, women like my mother who Single handedly made millions from her businesses, cared for a bunch of children, cooked cleaned and was a superwoman.  While my father was off being an alcoholic and womanizing. My father was not on a high salary when they married. 

You disrespect female lawyers, doctors, politicians, bankers, CEO’s and Directors like my mother, sister and cousins and more. Grow and and become more civilized. 
 

 

[GurjantGnostic]

2 hours ago, Sat1 said:

“A woman doesn’t want to win, she wants a winner”
 

She doesn’t want privilege, she doesn’t want a human being disrespected and the above being said so have some respect. 
 

With your above comment you disrespect hard working women, successful women, women like my mother who Single handedly made millions from her businesses, cared for a bunch of children, cooked cleaned and was a superwoman.  While my father was off being an alcoholic and womanizing. My father was not on a high salary when they married. 

You disrespect female lawyers, doctors, politicians, bankers, CEO’s and Directors like my mother, sister and cousins and more. Grow and and become more civilized. 
 

 

Nah... everyone's free to disagree with you. Sorry. 

[GurjantGnostic]

And you can keep your civilization, it's evil. How it escapes you I have no idea. Dead set in ego I guess. Maybe expand that oneness to include everyone your empire <banned word filter activated> on. 

[Ranjeet01]

4 hours ago, Sat1 said:

“A woman doesn’t want to win, she wants a winner”
 

She doesn’t want privilege, she doesn’t want a human being disrespected and the above being said so have some respect. 
 

With your above comment you disrespect hard working women, successful women, women like my mother who Single handedly made millions from her businesses, cared for a bunch of children, cooked cleaned and was a superwoman.  While my father was off being an alcoholic and womanizing. My father was not on a high salary when they married. 

You disrespect female lawyers, doctors, politicians, bankers, CEO’s and Directors like my mother, sister and cousins and more. Grow and and become more civilized. 
 

 

How have I disrespected any woman or even hardworking women?

You are deluded.

If you are a male CEO, you can marry someone who is lower status to you. Like Bill Gates did with his wife Melinda Gates  (she worked for him).

If you are a female CEO, your pool diminishes because you want to marry someone of equal status or above. They want a winner, some one who is above them in status. They don't want someone below them. A female CEO would want a Jeff Bezos or an Elon Musk not the male head of marketing in her company.

[learningkaur]

3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

How have I disrespected any woman or even hardworking women?

You are deluded.

If you are a male CEO, you can marry someone who is lower status to you. Like Bill Gates did with his wife Melinda Gates  (she worked for him).

If you are a female CEO, your pool diminishes because you want to marry someone of equal status or above. They want a winner, some one who is above them in status. They don't want someone below them. A female CEO would want a Jeff Bezos or an Elon Musk not the male head of marketing in her company.

I think it’s because you don’t use the term ‘some women’, you talk as if it’s all.

I think your experiences with women are limited (some of your opinions aren’t even based on first hand experiences, it’s my mother said, my Pua said).

I can think of five cousins/sister inlaws who married men who make less than them- we aren’t an ugly family either. I personally was earning more than my husband, however now we have totally reversed where with Maharajs kirpa he owns multiple successful businesses.. I have both a undergrad and post grad qualification, his education didn’t go past school. I wasn’t desperate either, quite the opposite...

Your ideas that you are coming up apparently are based on most women... most women in the world aren’t religious and most of these women now meet men in clubs etc. People go on initial attraction.

I have male cousins who work high up in the corporate world and turn their nose down on nurses and teachers. So this is why to me and Sat your generalisations are inaccurate. I’m not saying there aren’t women like this, but you seem very sure your opinions represent most women however it can depend on your social circle, I find successful women who were brought up well and who do make money are secure in themselves that they don’t always need a man to make more. Money isn’t everything. Once you have it you realise how much you don’t need it.

I do see women however who are generally from poor backgrounds who watch what others have, and they are the ones who want that lottery ticket out, I agree it happens. However these days a lot of women are realising true happiness is what’s important and that doesn’t come out of materialistic things. Most women would rather a supportive loving partner.

[Ranjeet01]

4 minutes ago, learningkaur said:

I think it’s because you don’t use the term ‘some women’, you talk as if it’s all.

I think your experiences with women are limited (some of your opinions aren’t even based on first hand experiences, it’s my mother said, my Pua said).

Personally I don’t know any one of my generation who had an arranged marriage, if that’s when your experience of career talk has come in big. I only have seen people date and marry, generally what’s happened is people have got together based on initial attraction and charm, then the rest is based on this build up of lust. I can think of five cousins/sister inlaws who married men who make less than them- we aren’t an ugly family either. I personally was earning more than my husband, however now we have totally reversed where with Maharajs kirpa he owns multiple successful businesses.. I have both a undergrad and post grad qualification, his education didn’t go past school. I wasn’t desperate either, quite the opposite... Its a totally different world when you meet someone on a night out like in my case.

Your ideas that you are coming up apparently are based on most women... most women in the world aren’t religious and most of these women now meet men in clubs etc. People go on initial attraction.

I do however have male cousins who work high up in the corporate world and turn their nose down on nurses and teachers. So this is why to me and Sat your generalisations are inaccurate. I’m not saying there aren’t women like this, but you seem very sure your opinions represent most women however it can depend on your social circle, I find successful women who were brought up well and who do make money are secure in themselves that they don’t always need a man to make more. Money isn’t everything. Once you have it you realise how much you don’t need it.

I do see women however who are generally from poor backgrounds who watch what others have, and they are the ones who want that lottery ticket out, I agree it happens. However these days a lot of women are realising true happiness is what’s important and that doesn’t come out of materialistic things. Most women would rather a supportive loving partner.

What you are saying is NAWALT.

Which is not all women are like that.

However, I think that all women are like that, this is like basic default programming. 

It is just it impacts women to varying degrees and some women are able to act upon this and others aren't.

It doesn't matter if the woman is religious or not, the hard wiring is there.

All that might happen through socialisation and religion,  the basic software and been overwritten with a software upgrade.  

However even a religious Amritdhari girl will chose 

There is truth in generalisations. Just because you may not see it in your direct sphere does not mean it does not exist. 

My experiences are based on a wider net than you realise. 

[Sat1]

On 7/9/2020 at 4:17 AM, GurjantGnostic said:

And you can keep your civilization, it's evil. How it escapes you I have no idea. Dead set in ego I guess. Maybe expand that oneness to include everyone your empire <banned word filter activated> on. 

Lol. Woah..hostile 

[Sat1]

On 7/9/2020 at 10:25 AM, Ranjeet01 said:

What you are saying is NAWALT.

Which is not all women are like that.

However, I think that all women are like that, this is like basic default programming. 

It is just it impacts women to varying degrees and some women are able to act upon this and others aren't.

It doesn't matter if the woman is religious or not, the hard wiring is there.

All that might happen through socialisation and religion,  the basic software and been overwritten with a software upgrade.  

However even a religious Amritdhari girl will chose 

There is truth in generalisations. Just because you may not see it in your direct sphere does not mean it does not exist. 

My experiences are based on a wider net than you realise. 

She is a woman, so you’re saying she’s like that. How would you feel if a woman made similar statements about men. Do you not understand that you’re stereotyping and generalizing. You don’t seem to understand that there are good women out there due to your limited experiences and beliefs.