Why do feminists accuse house duties as "being domesticated" , but conveniently think of men as ATM ?

[GurjantGnostic]

3 minutes ago, Sat1 said:

Lol. Woah..hostile 

Like your evilization. 

[Ranjeet01]

1 hour ago, Sat1 said:

She is a woman, so you’re saying she’s like that. How would you feel if a woman made similar statements about men. Do you not understand that you’re stereotyping and generalizing. You don’t seem to understand that there are good women out there due to your limited experiences and beliefs. 

I never said that there aren't good women.

You miss the point completely. 

[MisterrSingh]

[Ranjeet01]

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2007/10/in_economic_terms_you_are_a_de.html

 

[Guest]

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

what ungrateful b****

I would have excused her until I read the last line where she bashed him for being a truck driver. <banned word filter activated>

btw , the guy is also idiotic if this is true. why would you spend so much on her ? could have educated himself in that amount of money

[Not2Cool2Argue]

On 7/9/2020 at 2:25 AM, Ranjeet01 said:

What you are saying is NAWALT.

Which is not all women are like that.

However, I think that all women are like that, this is like basic default programming. 

It is just it impacts women to varying degrees and some women are able to act upon this and others aren't.

It doesn't matter if the woman is religious or not, the hard wiring is there.

All that might happen through socialisation and religion,  the basic software and been overwritten with a software upgrade.  

However even a religious Amritdhari girl will chose 

There is truth in generalisations. Just because you may not see it in your direct sphere does not mean it does not exist. 

My experiences are based on a wider net than you realise. 

Since you're stereotyping. What about the other stereotype that most women go for the alpha, <banned word filter activated>, bad boy and not the nice guys?

So many men are butthurt over that stereotype all over social media and now you are declaring the exact opposite is true. That most women will go for nice guys. Stable, high earning ones in the 35s to 40s.

The truth is neither stereotype is completely true. When young, women will go more for the "cool" ones. Thats why most girls who are teenage moms end up as single moms. Because they chose immature guys who only knew to act cool. Look at heer ranjha, romeo juliett, the girl never takes into account his prospectives. Nor her own. Or she would realize how impossible it was.

But as women get older and wiser. They realize how hard earning money is, how hard rising kids is. So they want people rich enough to support them while they go through childbirth and raising them. This is what you are stating is the absolute truth. But its only one mindset on the spectrum of womens believes. And this spectrum is reached in the west after they have got a career they worked hard for. But in the East, it is taught to the women. Parents ridicule young love and make their kids give up on poorer crushes by putting them down and saying how will he support you? Even in arranged marriages it is parents who go around asking about the job and earning potential. The girl just cares about looks and if a little wiser the personality.

But they soon realize (some faster some once they are older and wiser or as you say 'desperate') that support is not only in the monetary form. Having another adult in the house helps alot doesnt matter how poor he is. A master's degree and advertising director of a health clinic married a janitor. She said she had saves 40k and was realizing money wasnt everything. She spent all her savings on the wedding. Meaning guy had nothing. She was my boss for a while.

Yes its only one anecdote and it may fit into ur unless shes desperate exception. 

But ur theory is not a reflection of women in general. Just one mindset they may have. And mostly perpetuated by society. Not an internal instinct. And as they become wiser or realize the harshness/reality of the world, they change the money is everthing mindset quite fast.

 

 

 

[Ranjeet01]

8 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

Since you're stereotyping. What about the other stereotype that most women go for the alpha, <banned word filter activated>, bad boy and not the nice guys?

So many men are butthurt over that stereotype all over social media and now you are declaring the exact opposite is true. That most women will go for nice guys. Stable, high earning ones in the 35s to 40s.

The truth is neither stereotype is completely true. When young, women will go more for the "cool" ones. Thats why most girls who are teenage moms end up as single moms. Because they chose immature guys who only knew to act cool. Look at heer ranjha, romeo juliett, the girl never takes into account his prospectives. Nor her own. Or she would realize how impossible it was.

But as women get older and wiser. They realize how hard earning money is, how hard rising kids is. So they want people rich enough to support them while they go through childbirth and raising them. This is what you are stating is the absolute truth. But its only one mindset on the spectrum of womens believes. And this spectrum is reached in the west after they have got a career they worked hard for. But in the East, it is taught to the women. Parents ridicule young love and make their kids give up on poorer crushes by putting them down and saying how will he support you? Even in arranged marriages it is parents who go around asking about the job and earning potential. The girl just cares about looks and if a little wiser the personality.

But they soon realize (some faster some once they are older and wiser or as you say 'desperate') that support is not only in the monetary form. Having another adult in the house helps alot doesnt matter how poor he is. A master's degree and advertising director of a health clinic married a janitor. She said she had saves 40k and was realizing money wasnt everything. She spent all her savings on the wedding. Meaning guy had nothing. She was my boss for a while.

Yes its only one anecdote and it may fit into ur unless shes desperate exception. 

But ur theory is not a reflection of women in general. Just one mindset they may have. And mostly perpetuated by society. Not an internal instinct. And as they become wiser or realize the harshness/reality of the world, they change the money is everthing mindset quite fast.

 

 

 

What you have is quite right but I can reply to certain things on this topic which may not give a full picture.

Women have dual mating strategy which can be quite difficult to achieve.

Women want the tall buff guy which they would like children with and also have the strong provider to help out with raising the children.

There is generally a compromise.

Women have something called hypergamy and this traditionally has been controlled in society. That is why we never see the full extent of female nature.

However with feminism and the sexual revolution for the last 50 years, there is unfettered hypergamy and in society we are beginning to parts of female nature publicly exposed and there are women beginning to say things publicly which is make this abundantly clear.

Here is a quote from Sheryl Sandberg:

my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.

There are good reasons as to why are society has been structured. Some may it is patriarchal etc but the more you see where society is headed the more you realise why certain things were controlled in the first place.

 

 

[Not2Cool2Argue]

2 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

What you have is quite right but I can reply to certain things on this topic which may not give a full picture.

Women have dual mating strategy which can be quite difficult to achieve.

Women want the tall buff guy which they would like children with and also have the strong provider to help out with raising the children.

There is generally a compromise.

Women have something called hypergamy and this traditionally has been controlled in society. That is why we never see the full extent of female nature.

However with feminism and the sexual revolution for the last 50 years, there is unfettered hypergamy and in society we are beginning to parts of female nature publicly exposed and there are women beginning to say things publicly which is make this abundantly clear.

Here is a quote from Sheryl Sandberg:

my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.

There are good reasons as to why are society has been structured. Some may it is patriarchal etc but the more you see where society is headed the more you realise why certain things were controlled in the first place.

 

 

I disagree. 

Hypergamy is not an instinct women have but are taught. And some are even able to overcome this lesson. 

[Ranjeet01]

2 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

I disagree. 

Hypergamy is not an instinct women have but are taught. And some are even able to overcome this lesson. 

Biology trumps everything. 

[Not2Cool2Argue]

1 minute ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Biology trumps everything. 

My point is, it isnt biology. You just changed your stance from hypergamy to dual mating strategy. Then when that fails someone will come up with another false stereotype that apparently explains women and use evolution to prove it.

Yes successful reproduction is the aim of evolution. But it isnt just resources (wealth) strength (alpha) that determines that. Its also intelligence, loyalty (so partner doesnt run off leaving the kids unprotected). So while what males look for a mate is easily explained by evolution, not so for females.