Jump to content

Why do feminists accuse house duties as "being domesticated" , but conveniently think of men as ATM ?


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Not2Cool2Argue said:

My point is, it isnt biology. You just changed your stance from hypergamy to dual mating strategy. Then when that fails someone will come up with another false stereotype that apparently explains women and use evolution to prove it.

Yes successful reproduction is the aim of evolution. But it isnt just resources (wealth) strength (alpha) that determines that. Its also intelligence, loyalty (so partner doesnt run off leaving the kids unprotected). So while what males look for a mate is easily explained by evolution, not so for females. 

Dual mating strategy is part of hypergamy. 

Ideally women want a highly financial successful man with high social status who is also over 6 foot tall and is athletically built with broad shoulders and V taper and narrow waist.

That is not always possible.

Evolutionary speaking, you have more female ancestors than male because women historically chose the top men.

80 per cent of men never had any children.

Biologically (animal instinct) women would share an alpha with other man than be with a faithful loyal beta loser. 

If you are top level male and you had other women, your current spouse will not necessarily leave you because being desired by other women means that you higher market value in a lot of their eyes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I see the Femisikhs are out in force.

sherlock+and+watson+laughing.gif

They've gone on a passive-aggressive downvoting spree in this thread. Only women and effeminate men are so disturbed by opinions they disagree with. ??

 

bloke , I've got plenty of downvotes too , it's silly but a thing apparently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

What you have is quite right but I can reply to certain things on this topic which may not give a full picture.

Women have dual mating strategy which can be quite difficult to achieve.

Women want the tall buff guy which they would like children with and also have the strong provider to help out with raising the children.

There is generally a compromise.

Women have something called hypergamy and this traditionally has been controlled in society. That is why we never see the full extent of female nature.

However with feminism and the sexual revolution for the last 50 years, there is unfettered hypergamy and in society we are beginning to parts of female nature publicly exposed and there are women beginning to say things publicly which is make this abundantly clear.

Here is a quote from Sheryl Sandberg:

my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should be smart, opinionated and ambitious. Someone who values fairness and expects or, even better, wants to do his share in the home. These men exist and, trust me, over time, nothing is sexier.

There are good reasons as to why are society has been structured. Some may it is patriarchal etc but the more you see where society is headed the more you realise why certain things were controlled in the first place.

 

 

Sandberg is dumb , why not save yourself from trouble and destroying your rep and self-worth 'kissing frogs ' when there are guys who do want to settle down with  an intelligent reliable LOYAL woman not kid and just stay focussed on getting the right guy first time. A Recent graduate is never going to be monied but he will have prospects and hopefully drive , and why wouldn't you back him up just as he would you ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/19/2020 at 12:27 PM, Ranjeet01 said:

Dual mating strategy is part of hypergamy. 

Ideally women want a highly financial successful man with high social status who is also over 6 foot tall and is athletically built with broad shoulders and V taper and narrow waist.

That is not always possible.

Evolutionary speaking, you have more female ancestors than male because women historically chose the top men.

80 per cent of men never had any children.

Biologically (animal instinct) women would share an alpha with other man than be with a faithful loyal beta loser. 

If you are top level male and you had other women, your current spouse will not necessarily leave you because being desired by other women means that you higher market value in a lot of their eyes.

 

 

Ok fine. It does make sense to have a wealthy, high status, athletic person from an evolutionary point of view so that the female is not in danger from other tribal members nor nature and so has a higher chance of reproduction. 

However, the reptilian brain that controls our instincts can be overridden by the thinking brain. And while more females will find the alpha male attractive, most females will not act only on that instinct. They also look for kindness, humor, and intelligence.  

You forget women have a higher emotional need. They will take that into account as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use