Jump to content

Are sikhs a bholi qaum ? .


Guest
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's actually a lot more of a pertinent strategy for a minority group (surrounded by larger, more powerful entities) who neither has the numbers nor the reach to physically affect matters against its more imposing competitors.

The Hindus are a majority; for them it's just state-craft when directed against Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, etc. The true problem for them is Islam. If Sikhs behaved and conducted themselves with Jewish tenacity as exemplified by the rabbi's quote, we'd make it our policy to pit Hindus against the Muslims in India. The ensuing chaos would clear a path for us to conduct our own actions that will benefit our cause. But that'll never happen. Have you seen our religious and political leadership? Rowdy, corrupt old men who can barely see into the end of the next week nevermind 10 or 20 years into the future.

Our religious ethos is also a factor. Behaving with honour and integrity is central to our philosophy. Unfortunately, we seem to develop a spiritual conscience when dealing with our enemy, but nothing of the sort amongst ourselves. Are we afraid of the outsider but intolerant of our own?

I always chuckle with an inner happiness whenever I see hindus cry foul over the ramifications of secularism in India and taking advantage of by muslims and christians, or for instance having abrahamic faiths being imposed on them by indirect ways like muslim call to prayer from loudspeaker which hindus are increasingly speaking against. 

And if the state is not ruled by modi's party , then its unlikely that police will favor for hindus and instead try to get the hindus to lower their voice lest it creates a potential unrest.

I absolutely love it when that happens . Because I get to see how they now feel when they get victimized by the governments they think are their own, in their own land. They did same to us, didn't they 30 to 40 yrs back and still now ! 

The potential enemy against hindutva in india who can give it a match is not sikhs right now  , but Islam , and this is why the seemingly foolish sikhs who put langar for CAA protestors in new delhi aren't that stupid. They see after muslims are done with, its sikhs and our institutions who're on the chopping block. Let muslim demography grow more lol, and hindus <banned word filter activated> in their dhotis lmao.

All this while I am perfectly aware muslims are no friend of sikhs either. But a convenient tool against fireband hindutva which is one of the greatest threat to sikhs today, apart from christianity in punjab 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

I always chuckle with an inner happiness whenever I see hindus cry foul over the ramifications of secularism in India and taking advantage of by muslims and christians, or for instance having abrahamic faiths being imposed on them by indirect ways like muslim call to prayer from loudspeaker which hindus are increasingly speaking against. 

And if the state is not ruled by modi's party , then its unlikely that police will favor for hindus and instead try to get the hindus to lower their voice lest it creates a potential unrest.

I absolutely love it when that happens . Because I get to see how they now feel when they get victimized by the governments they think are their own, in their own land. They did same to us, didn't they 30 to 40 yrs back and still now ! 

The potential enemy against hindutva in india who can give it a match is not sikhs right now  , but Islam , and this is why the seemingly foolish sikhs who put langar for CAA protestors in new delhi aren't that stupid. They see after muslims are done with, its sikhs and our institutions who're on the chopping block. Let muslim demography grow more lol, and hindus <banned word filter activated> in their dhotis lmao.

All this while I am perfectly aware muslims are no sikh friend of hindus either. But a convenient tool against fireband hindutva which is one of the greatest threat to sikhs today, apart from christianity in punjab 

I disagree. Allowing a fire to spread so that it destroys one of your deadliest enemies may seem like a good idea in the short-term, but never forget that the fire won't stop burning until it's also destroyed YOU. Do you really want to empower Islam to the point that it dominates in India? To me, that's suicide. A slower suicide compared to death by Hinduism, but suicide nonetheless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I disagree. Allowing a fire to spread so that it destroys one of your deadliest enemies may seem like a good idea in the short-term, but never forget that the fire won't stop burning until it's also destroyed YOU. Do you really want to empower Islam to the point that it dominates in India? To me, that's suicide. A slower suicide compared to death by Hinduism, but suicide nonetheless.

I understand neither side is our friend . 

But islam as of now stands approx 15% of india . It isn't that much either. And considering the average peace-loving hindu who has rarely pelted a stone at a dog are "woke" now and share posts on facebook regarding islamic conspiracies itself shows how awake they're to the ugly realities of islam, and reestablishment of a hindu state by dissing the "secularism" which they now consider anti-hindu.

In such scheme of things, why shouldn't Sikhs silently support Islam. I say silently because letting hindus chronically that sikhs lean towards muslims isn't in the best interest of sikhs either. Some feelings should be obscured from visibility 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AjeetSingh2019 said:

I understand neither side is our friend . 

But islam as of now stands approx 15% of india . It isn't that much either. And considering the average peace-loving hindu who has rarely pelted a stone at a dog are "woke" now and share posts on facebook regarding islamic conspiracies itself shows how awake they're to the ugly realities of islam, and reestablishment of a hindu state by dissing the "secularism" which they now consider anti-hindu.

In such scheme of things, why shouldn't Sikhs silently support Islam. I say silently because letting hindus chronically that sikhs lean towards muslims isn't in the best interest of sikhs either. Some feelings should be obscured from visibility 

You're making two major mistakes: 1. You're being unnecessarily vindictive. 2. You seem to think there's an OFF valve to Islam that Sikhs can turn just at the right moment once it's served our purpose. You realise that's a fantasy, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, MuslimNeighbour said:

Would probably explain lack of interfaith dialogue, philosophical discussion and further explain why threads such as 'How can we get Sikhi to expand' are made with answers such as 'introduce them to Yoga first' come 

Yeah because we do not rape or force people into our religion like you lot, you had heads of of children around the necks of their mothers, you disgusting mf 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

You're making two major mistakes: 1. You're being unnecessarily vindictive. 2. You seem to think there's an OFF valve to Islam that Sikhs can turn just at the right moment once it's served our purpose. You realise that's a fantasy, right?

I am not being vindictive. But trust me, a rising hindu nationalism is very dangerous for panthic identity , regardless of the sweet words they say. Heck I have been told on face some not so decent words about sikh gurus and sikh history , ridiculing its authenticity, and how they would have sikhs revert back to hinduism . This was after this guy saw Banda Bahadur animated movie. 

The valve to control them is hindutva itself. They have a crazy wide network of organisations and the largest political party in the world at their disposal. The average muslim is poor in India , they have a hard time making ends meet, forget about crusading against infidels with an agenda. So why not support them ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to Are sikhs a bholi qaum ? .

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use