Jump to content

The Psychology of Prince Andrew


puzzled
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 11 months later...

That interview was the most damning one he's ever done. Epstein was an intelligence op at the highest levels using minors to honeytrap politicians,royals and corporate leaders to dance to the tune of the intelligence agency doing the blackmailing.

For a person who claims to have never met her,this image seems damning.

 

 

andrew victoria.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, PuzzledToo said:

That interview was the most damning one he's ever done. Epstein was an intelligence op at the highest levels using minors to honeytrap politicians,royals and corporate leaders to dance to the tune of the intelligence agency doing the blackmailing.

For a person who claims to have never met her,this image seems damning.

 

 

 

Intelligence op for whom?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PuzzledToo said:

That interview was the most damning one he's ever done. Epstein was an intelligence op at the highest levels using minors to honeytrap politicians,royals and corporate leaders to dance to the tune of the intelligence agency doing the blackmailing.

For a person who claims to have never met her,this image seems damning.

 

 

andrew victoria.jpg

Caught red handed. Literally. What's up with the red skin lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58866108

Epstein: Met to take no action after Prince Andrew review

Published
1 hour ago

The Metropolitan Police will not take any further action against the Duke of York following a review prompted by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre.

Ms Giuffre is suing Prince Andrew in the US for allegedly sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager.

Prince Andrew has consistently denied Ms Giuffre's allegations.

In August, the Met said it would review its decision not to investigate allegations connected to Epstein.

Ms Giuffre, 38, claims she was sexually assaulted by the prince at three locations - London, New York and on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean.

Her case claims Prince Andrew engaged in sexual acts without Ms Giuffre's consent, including when she was 17.

The Met also confirmed it had completed its review into allegations reported in June by broadcaster Channel 4 News that British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, trafficked, groomed and abused women and girls in the UK.

The force said it had "reviewed information passed to us by a media organisation in June" and decided that "no further action will be taken".

In August 2019, US financier Epstein was found dead in his cell in New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center.

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein were pictured walking together through New York's Central ParkIMAGE SOURCE,NEWS SYNDICATION
Image caption,Prince Andrew - seen walking with Jeffrey Epstein in Central Park in New York in 2010 - has faced scrutiny over his ties to the convicted sex offender

The Met previously ruled out opening an investigation into Epstein, but in August Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida <banned word filter activated> said the force would review the decision.

On Sunday, the Met said: "As a matter of procedure, MPS officers reviewed a document released in August 2021 as part of a US civil action. This review has concluded and we are taking no further action."

The Met added that it will continue to liaise with other law enforcement agencies who are leading the investigation into matters associated with Epstein.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2021 at 1:31 AM, Premi5 said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58866108

Epstein: Met to take no action after Prince Andrew review

Published
1 hour ago

The Metropolitan Police will not take any further action against the Duke of York following a review prompted by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre.

Ms Giuffre is suing Prince Andrew in the US for allegedly sexually assaulting her when she was a teenager.

Prince Andrew has consistently denied Ms Giuffre's allegations.

In August, the Met said it would review its decision not to investigate allegations connected to Epstein.

Ms Giuffre, 38, claims she was sexually assaulted by the prince at three locations - London, New York and on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean.

Her case claims Prince Andrew engaged in sexual acts without Ms Giuffre's consent, including when she was 17.

The Met also confirmed it had completed its review into allegations reported in June by broadcaster Channel 4 News that British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, trafficked, groomed and abused women and girls in the UK.

The force said it had "reviewed information passed to us by a media organisation in June" and decided that "no further action will be taken".

In August 2019, US financier Epstein was found dead in his cell in New York's Metropolitan Correctional Center.

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein were pictured walking together through New York's Central ParkIMAGE SOURCE,NEWS SYNDICATION
Image caption,Prince Andrew - seen walking with Jeffrey Epstein in Central Park in New York in 2010 - has faced scrutiny over his ties to the convicted sex offender

The Met previously ruled out opening an investigation into Epstein, but in August Metropolitan Police Commissioner Dame Cressida <banned word filter activated> said the force would review the decision.

On Sunday, the Met said: "As a matter of procedure, MPS officers reviewed a document released in August 2021 as part of a US civil action. This review has concluded and we are taking no further action."

The Met added that it will continue to liaise with other law enforcement agencies who are leading the investigation into matters associated with Epstein.

What no charges? This is my surprised face. 

That's okay. Jamdoots don't work for the met. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use