Jump to content

One of the major reasons for the Fall of the Sikh Empire


MisterrSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon2 said:

I mean what was the alternative? We would have likely stayed in the jungles and died in the jungles. Look what the Brits did to proud, rebellious, one dimensional fighting force of Native Indians. We were just as one dimensional of a fighting force before. 

No, not my answer. You've still in no way shown how the hired Europeans contributed to the downfall. I've got my issues with how things were run. But, those Europeans did indeed help Punjab/Sikhs get with the times. 

Where has that "getting with the times" lead us to this moment? What do we have to show for it in a temporal sense?

I think we need to accept that the Sikh Empire benefited "Sikh" elites, and did very little for the long-term spiritual and temporal side of things for the people. Looking back on that time with a misplaced sense of achievement on feats that weren't even our own is embarrassing. "At least we had a kingdom in name" is how losers think.

Plus, crowing about European mercenaries is so, so wrong. As it says in the Machiavelli text, they don't "feel" the pain of the struggle as someone with the same so-called tribal background would. If we didn't have the numbers for a purely Sikh army, then in my opinion we delayed the inevitable by travelling down a pleasant albiet temporary diverted route, but we still ended up in the same place had we tried to struggle through with solely our own people doing things. The only reason I wouldn't object, per se, to the mercenary argument is if we still had something concrete to show for it, and, of course, if we'd built on it to a certain degree.

A SIKH empire headed by a far-sighted, shrewd yet religiously-minded figurehead would've prioritised parchaar and conversion. More Sikhs = more soldiers. The numbers game. One Maharaja Ranjit Singh cannot achieve anything without the bodies to win the battle. Unfortunately for him, he invested in the wrong bodies, because his mentality wasn't as Sikh-centric as it should've been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, justasking said:

i feel that establishing more sikh dominated neighbourhoods in the west is the way to go, it can be seen as a sort of colonisation on our part. we establish ourselves and when the west try to extert influence on us we push back on them and make them afraid of us

UK Sikhs lack the mentality to do so. It's kind of a nobleness (if I'm being generous) that does not revel in upsetting the apple cart. We are happy to go with the flow without making waves. On one hand it is a positive attribute, but when we're surrounded by opportunistic and ruthless minority groups who will make the most of any chance passed up by a group such as ours, we end up falling to the back of the line with hardly any representation to make ourselves heard. 

There are also other behaviours exhibited by us that work against our collective interests. But I'm not certain if that can be attributed to an ingrained exclusively Sikh mentality, or whether it is a symptom of the selfish individualistic mindset that has swept all communities in the West for the last 40 or so years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/15/2020 at 4:46 AM, MisterrSingh said:

Where has that "getting with the times" lead us to this moment? What do we have to show for it in a temporal sense?

I think we need to accept that the Sikh Empire benefited "Sikh" elites, and did very little for the long-term spiritual and temporal side of things for the people. Looking back on that time with a misplaced sense of achievement on feats that weren't even our own is embarrassing. "At least we had a kingdom in name" is how losers think.

Plus, crowing about European mercenaries is so, so wrong. As it says in the Machiavelli text, they don't "feel" the pain of the struggle as someone with the same so-called tribal background would. If we didn't have the numbers for a purely Sikh army, then in my opinion we delayed the inevitable by travelling down a pleasant albiet temporary diverted route, but we still ended up in the same place had we tried to struggle through with solely our own people doing things. The only reason I wouldn't object, per se, to the mercenary argument is if we still had something concrete to show for it, and, of course, if we'd built on it to a certain degree.

A SIKH empire headed by a far-sighted, shrewd yet religiously-minded figurehead would've prioritised parchaar and conversion. More Sikhs = more soldiers. The numbers game. One Maharaja Ranjit Singh cannot achieve anything without the bodies to win the battle. Unfortunately for him, he invested in the wrong bodies, because his mentality wasn't as Sikh-centric as it should've been.

By "times" I mean in terms of material war assets. Not in a spiritual/mental way. I may be entirely wrong, but I believe if we were still a primarily cavalry force, our haal today would be worse than what it was. We would have been probably routed in the late 18th century or early 19th century, and been how the Natives are today. 

However, this post of yours bro I can agree with. We had a great chance to really do something in that era, but ultimately the faults of Maharaja Ranjit Singh prevailed over his talents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, KhoonKaBadlaKhoon2 said:

However, this post of yours bro I can agree with. We had a great chance to really do something in that era, but ultimately the faults of Maharaja Ranjit Singh prevailed over his talents. 

It was a different era with different dynamics at play, but it does make me admire the various Caliphs that came after Mohammed, their sole aim being to expand Islam, even if the individuals themselves weren't model Muslims. They shrewdly understood the importance of a unifying creed that could be used to bind a tribe and gain power and control of areas and people. The sheer force of exerting this Will overpowers any notions of ideological merit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

It was a different era with different dynamics at play, but it does make me admire the various Caliphs that came after Mohammed, their sole aim being to expand Islam, even if the individuals themselves weren't model Muslims. They shrewdly understood the importance of a unifying creed that could be used to bind a tribe and gain power and control of areas and people. The sheer force of exerting this Will overpowers any notions of ideological merit. 

That is because with Islam, the power and politics came first, the religion came afterwards. 

There were generals like Hari Singh Nalwa that understood the empire had to be consolidated and Sikhi had to be on the forefront.

My understanding of some of the European Generals that came into the Khalsa Empire helped to organise some of the forces with more drilling and formations like they had with some of the European armies had at the time.

Ranjit Singh even though an illerate man was very good at recognising new techniques and methods to absorb into his army. 

He was very pragmatic in many regards but he has shown some of the perils of being too pragmatic at the expense of other factors in his empire  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use