Jump to content

Farmer protest exposes anti Sikh nature of liberal Punjabi Hindus


Jonny101
 Share

Recommended Posts

In this debate which was suppose to be about farmer protests in Delhi this journalist who is a known liberal Hindu of Punjabi background exposes her anti Sikh sentiments. Her name is Barkha Dutt. Just like other liberal Hindus like Shekhar Gupta who displays his genocidal pulse by praising mass murderers like KPS Gill and Gen Brar, she also insists that Deep Sidhu must call Sant Bhindrawale a terrorist in order for her to carry on this conversation. She repeatedly cuts him off, doesn't even allow him to finish his point. While most of us associate only right wing RSS type Hindus to be anti Sikh but these far left liberal Hindus are even worse in some aspects. They (liberal Hindus) have no problem with supporting Muslims or Christians but deep inside they hate Sikhs when Sikhs ask for their rights. 

Far left leaning Liberal Hindus should not be confused with average Hindus who don't really care about far left or right wing ideologies. But these far leftists should be identified. Sikh scholar Ajmer Singh is probably the only Sikh vidhvaan to identify these far leftist Hindus as being anti Sikh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

In this debate which was suppose to be about farmer protests in Delhi this journalist who is a known liberal Hindu of Punjabi background exposes her anti Sikh sentiments. Her name is Barkha Dutt. Just like other liberal Hindus like Shekhar Gupta who displays his genocidal pulse by praising mass murderers like KPS Gill and Gen Brar, she also insists that Deep Sidhu must call Sant Bhindrawale a terrorist in order for her to carry on this conversation. She repeatedly cuts him off, doesn't even allow him to finish his point. While most of us associate only right wing RSS type Hindus to be anti Sikh but these far left liberal Hindus are even worse in some aspects. They (liberal Hindus) have no problem with supporting Muslims or Christians but deep inside they hate Sikhs when Sikhs ask for their rights. 

Far left leaning Liberal Hindus should not be confused with average Hindus who don't really care about far left or right wing ideologies. But these far leftists should be identified. Sikh scholar Ajmer Singh is probably the only Sikh vidhvaan to identify these far leftist Hindus as being anti Sikh.

I am quite aware of Barkha Dutt. 

She is hated by Hindus and seen as Anti-Indian. She is very sympathetic to Kashmiri Muslim causes and was said to give away Indian positions during the Kargil War. Her political stance has always been more Pro Pakistan.

They (Hindus) call her a presstitute.

She has the gall to call Bindrawale a terrorist whilst mixing and mingling with Pakistani supporters of separation of her beloved India and that includes Islamic terrorists. 

The liberal Urban elite Hindu is very different from the average Hindu. The average Hindu hates these "liberal" types. 

This particular type of McCauliyite Hindu allowed the British Raj to happen, were the dhimmis that worked in the Mughal administration and were the Jai Chand types that sided with Ghori over Pritviraj Chauhan. They in their post-partition avatar are representative to globalist interests. 

Might I also add, we need to cool, calm, rational Sikhs like Deep Sidhu. I think that we have a reputation of being hot headed but Barkha like a lot of these "liberal" types had no real answer to what he said.

It is very easy to push their buttons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I am quite aware of Barkha Dutt. 

She is hated by Hindus and seen as Anti-Indian. She is very sympathetic to Kashmiri Muslim causes and was said to give away Indian positions during the Kargil War. Her political stance has always been more Pro Pakistan.

They (Hindus) call her a presstitute.

She has the gall to call Bindrawale a terrorist whilst mixing and mingling with Pakistani supporters of separation of her beloved India and that includes Islamic terrorists. 

The liberal Urban elite Hindu is very different from the average Hindu. The average Hindu hates these "liberal" types. 

This particular type of McCauliyite Hindu allowed the British Raj to happen, were the dhimmis that worked in the Mughal administration and were the Jai Chand types that sided with Ghori over Pritviraj Chauhan. They in their post-partition avatar are representative to globalist interests. 

Might I also add, we need to cool, calm, rational Sikhs like Deep Sidhu. I think that we have a reputation of being hot headed but Barkha like a lot of these "liberal" types had no real answer to what he said.

It is very easy to push their buttons.

She is the Congress version of Arnab Goswami and very pro Muslim.

If anyone asks you to say Bhindranwale was a terrorist ask them to first say Indira Gandhi was a terrorist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This farmer protest has done one thing, it has exposed right wing Modi media. How they are all trying very hard to portray this farmer protest as a Khalistani protest even though Hindu farmers from Haryana and western UP are involved too. But still they spread their propaganda because one random Punjabi farmer said something along the lines that "we got rid of Indira Gandhi then who is Modi". And they are showing that same video all over on repeat. It's shameless to say the least. At least be honest. They are not even discussing the issue and are just repeating the "this protest is being led by khalistani terrorists" point.

How does one even discuss an issue when the government and their blind followers are so dishonest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBC seem to have waded into the propaganda war against farmers by deviously implying that any overarching action carried out against farmers by the government is as a result of farmer malpractice and ignorance on their part. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-54930380

We have NO friends on either side of the dialectic. It's either follow either narrative or you're the enemy. Look how quick and easy it is to discredit the concerns of one group with one news article on a reputable news site. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Jonny101 said:

This farmer protest is done one thing, it has exposed right wing Modi media. How they are all trying very hard to portray this farmer protest as a Khalistani protest even though Hindu farmers from Haryana and western UP are involved too. But still they spread their propaganda because one random Punjabi farmer said something along the lines that "we got rid of Indira Gandhi then who is Modi". And they are showing that same video all over on repeat. It's shameless to say the least. At least be honest. They are not even discussing the issue and are just repeating the "this protest is being led by khalistani terrorists" point.

How does one even discuss an issue when the government and their blind followers are so dishonest.

We should be smart enough to not fall into this trap. I, as an NRI realise the India media are looking for any opportunity to defame us, so why not those people who've actually suffered at the government's hands be careful with their words? We can't keep being setup like this, fall into the trap baited for us, and then get upset about it. Keep Indira out of it. Stick to farming talking points. They want us to clown ourselves, and we do it every time. This hot tempered bravado is present in nearly every Sikh, lol, but it needs to be controlled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

We should be smart enough to not fall into this trap. I, as an NRI realise the India media are looking for any opportunity to defame us, so why not those people who've actually suffered at the government's hands be careful with their words? We can't keep being setup like this, fall into the trap baited for us, and then get upset about it. Keep Indira out of it. Stick to farming talking points. They want us to clown ourselves, and we do it every time. This hot tempered bravado is present in nearly every Sikh, lol, but it needs to be controlled.

That's just the thing. Sometimes our own people get into Josh and don't think before speaking. Now the state media is using this same video to discredit these farmers. But it's real low level dishonesty on the part of right wing Hindus to discredit genuine concerns of farmers by using lies and half truths. It's because of things like this that they push Sikhs into the arms of Muslims and then they blame ISI and Pakistanis for misguiding Sikhs.

Let's just hope that Modi does the smart thing and listens to the concerns of the farmers, but that seems too far fetched. 

As for the original video, Barkha Dutt really got triggered when Deep Sidhu used the term state terrorism. She acknowledges wrongs being done to Muslims by the state but doesn't want to acknowledge state terrorism that was done to the Sikhs that is well documented by all human rights organizations. They're not even open to the discussion as you can clearly see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

We should be smart enough to not fall into this trap. I, as an NRI realise the India media are looking for any opportunity to defame us, so why not those people who've actually suffered at the government's hands be careful with their words? We can't keep being setup like this, fall into the trap baited for us, and then get upset about it. Keep Indira out of it. Stick to farming talking points. They want us to clown ourselves, and we do it every time. This hot tempered bravado is present in nearly every Sikh, lol, but it needs to be controlled.

Yeah, they exploited the fact that maybe a few people distributed laddoos in Southall on Indira's demise, to help whip up a frenzy in Delhi. Our lot need to be more astute than this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use