Jump to content

Farmer protest exposes anti Sikh nature of liberal Punjabi Hindus


Jonny101
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 12/1/2020 at 6:53 PM, puzzled said:

Got a feeling this isn't going to end well  ?     tensions are rising, think government is going to come back with force.

A lot of kisaan from West UP are trying to get into Delhi but they have been blocked.

Celebs like Sunny Deol, Hans Raj and Daler Mehndi support the bill, BJP sell outs. 

 

celebs are tawiafs by pesha anyhow who cares about them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Mr Bhangal gives quite a detailed explanation here. It's about an hour long and it has commercials you might want to skip:

 

I was looking for something like this to clarify a few issues.

Ultimately, it boils down to the parasitic middle man merchants who are cheating the farmers. It's always them, isn't it? ??

Okay, so big picture: we know not all farmers are Sikhs, but a considerable portion are. If we're to operate on the assumption that this current problem is another chapter of the master plan to force Sikhs out of existence, is the government undertaking this action a way of making life difficult for Sikhs, forcing them out of farming, and thus out of India? Are other non-Sikh farmers collateral damage so that it doesn't seem like we're specifically being targeted? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I was looking for something like this to clarify a few issues.

Ultimately, it boils down to the parasitic middle man merchants who are cheating the farmers. It's always them, isn't it? ??

Okay, so big picture: we know not all farmers are Sikhs, but a considerable portion are. If we're to operate on the assumption that this current problem is another chapter of the master plan to force Sikhs out of existence, is the government undertaking this action a way of making life difficult for Sikhs, forcing them out of farming, and thus out of India? Are other non-Sikh farmers collateral damage so that it doesn't seem like we're specifically being targeted? 

It does seem that being a Sikh is seen as a thorn by the Indian establishment. 

Getting rid of this "thorn" would make things easier for them to further their agenda. 

They know that Hindus and Muslims will not put up as much of a resistance. 

It seems as Sikhs we galvanise non-Sikhs. If Punjab leads, the others will follow. 

The Central Government knows it has to deal with the Punjab Problem (that is how they see it). They can focus on one state.

But what is Punjab's problem becomes Haryana's problem become's Rajasthan's problem becomes UP's problem becomes Bihar's problem becomes Tamil Nadu's problem.

There is a domino effect.

The Centre cannot deal with all these insurgencies all at once. 

If Punjab was Kirk Douglas, Haryana is Tony Curtis and Indian Govt  is Laurence Olivier and the other states were the other slaves:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

celebs are tawiafs by pesha anyhow who cares about them

That's very true, like that Kangna Raunat who is no more than a nachan wali, who tried degrading Punjabi bibis at the protest by saying they are at the protests because they've been offered 100 rupees each. A bit rich coming from someone who appears half naked for a living.

It's a well known fact that Kangna works for BJP. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't think these 3 bills are a attack on Sikhs, considering India's population is a billion, Sikhs probably make around 5% of Indias farmers, maybe even less. 

South Indian farmers from Tamilnadu and Karnataka have been protesting for years, last year or the year before 100s of farmers came to Delhi to protest wearing green and Banga Sahib Gurdwara offered them langar and shelter for weeks.

Around 10 months back there were more protests in the South.

Whats going to trigger the government is how Sikhs were the ones that took these protests to a whole new level and encouraged 100s of thousands of people from other states to join in. 

UP farmers at the protest were shouting slogans against the Yogi guy. UP is a BJP strong hold so this is not great for the BJP party. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

It does seem that being a Sikh is seen as a thorn by the Indian establishment. 

Getting rid of this "thorn" would make things easier for them to further their agenda. 

They know that Hindus and Muslims will not put up as much of a resistance. 

It seems as Sikhs we galvanise non-Sikhs. If Punjab leads, the others will follow. 

The Central Government knows it has to deal with the Punjab Problem (that is how they see it). They can focus on one state.

But what is Punjab's problem becomes Haryana's problem become's Rajasthan's problem becomes UP's problem becomes Bihar's problem becomes Tamil Nadu's problem.

There is a domino effect.

The Centre cannot deal with all these insurgencies all at once. 

I think they may be banking on Sikh farmers chimping out, giving the government a pretence to get physical while simultaneously kicking the Khalistani propaganda into gear in the media in order to demonise Sikhs, and absolve themselves of any blame. We'll be put down like a lame puppy as a warning to the Rajasthanis, Biharis, and Tamils to behave themselves. As usual we'll get cucked while other Indian ethnicities watch on after having witnessed what's been done to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I think they may be banking on Sikh farmers chimping out, giving the government a pretence to get physical while simultaneously kicking the Khalistani propaganda into gear in the media in order to demonise Sikhs, and absolve themselves of any blame. We'll be put down like a lame puppy as a warning to the Rajasthanis, Biharis, and Tamils to behave themselves. As usual we'll get cucked while other Indian ethnicities watch on after having witnessed what's been done to us.

They want to make an example of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use