ex sikhs are not sikhs

[Premi5]

32 minutes ago, BhForce said:

No, bro, Sonia is one of the turncoats that I specifically mentioned.

 

I think @californiasardar1 was being sarcastic…

[dallysingh101]

2 hours ago, BhForce said:

Well, this is actually true. No reason to praise Lilly for that (because she's a hypocrite in this regard) but it doesn't make it untrue.

You could say the same about the Sardar Udham film. 

[BhForce]

Just now, dallysingh101 said:

You could say the same about the Sardar Udham film. 

Haven't seen it, how was it?

[dallysingh101]

On 3/19/2022 at 11:31 AM, BhForce said:

Haven't seen it, how was it?

I personally thought it was one of the best films I've seen in a long while. It has a very strong visible Sikh presence throughout. It was a very powerful movie. 

Check it out if you can. It's well worth it. Acting and directing (and even cinematography) were top class. Cleverly tied into many relevant, contemporary issues Sikhs are facing. 

[BhForce]

On 3/11/2022 at 2:16 PM, dallysingh101 said:

I think they'd sniff out someone like that at the interview stage and make sure he wasn't hired myself. 

They do. If not for journalists, certainly for IAS officers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Administrative_Service

Young Sikhs might get high marks in their IAS entrance exam, but they are weeded out at the interview stage. Only a few token suck-ups are accepted with sifarish.
 

[chatanga1]

On 3/10/2022 at 3:58 AM, BhForce said:

Sunny Hundal, Sonia Deol, some others, as a guess.

Has Sonia Deol actually said she is no longer a sikh?

 

On 3/10/2022 at 1:07 PM, proudkaur21 said:

A few managed to conquer india and other big continents. Alot of people here underestimate their potential.

That was mnay decades ago. They haven't managed to do too well in any wars they've been involved in, i the last 2 decades.

 

On 3/10/2022 at 1:18 PM, proactive said:

That's where we differ, you think Singh Sabha was a British creation while I see them as acting to save Sikhi from being just another Panth. If anything their sanatan opponents were the ones who thought you could worship at a Mandir in the morning, a Sufi shrine in the afternoon and a Gurdwara in the evening and you could still call yourself a Sikh. 

Although not the subject in hand, I will leave it at "Neither were right..."

 

On 3/10/2022 at 2:17 PM, californiasardar1 said:

Why are you guys crying about things like this when you are ready to make panthic heroes out of "ex-Sikhs" like deep sidhu?

What a joke.

Deep stood for the panth, and that is enough to make him a hero.

Jagtar Johal was the same. He cut his hair, but did a very good job of keeping the stories of the Khalistan movement alive.

If they aren't good enougn for you because you wear a turbna, maybe you should show us how it should be done?

 

On 3/10/2022 at 2:28 PM, californiasardar1 said:

Yes, he denounced Sikhi literally every single day. Anyone with functioning eyes could verify this.

Anyone with a functioning brain would see a maggot like ghaghriwala and see the same. but they wouldn't see it in ghaghri's beard or turban.

 

On 3/10/2022 at 2:43 PM, MisterrSingh said:

If you're sleeping with an enthusiastic non-Sikh while advocating for Sikh interests, I'd argue you're a hypocrite. No-one is expecting perfection, just some consistency.

Well in that case maybe we can ask Martin Docherty-Hughes, MP, who has relentlessly pursued Jagtar's case to shut up, as he is not Sikh enough?

Or tell Pat McFadden who worked tirelessly for Sikh interests in Panjab and UK for the l;ast 20 years, that he was a hypocrite?

I don't ever see any muslims questioning the religion or religious attire of support for Palestine, but Sikhs are something else.

I personally knew a mona guy married to a hindu woman, (not anand karaj) who is one of the brightest and sharpest minds I've seen when it comes to "Sikh interests" but it would be ok to argue he's a hypocrite I guess.

 

On 3/10/2022 at 3:01 PM, californiasardar1 said:

What good is hoisting the nishaan sahib on the red fort when you can't even let kesh grow on your face?

These people are not Sikhs. That is not my opinion. It is their opinion, and they express that opinion every time they use a razor blade.

It is YOUR opinion though. And you are entitled to it, just like any other Sikh who chooses to what degree they follow the Guru. If you're a braham gyani then that's different. Are you a braham gyani?

What good was there in planting the Khalsa flag at Peshawar when Maharaja Ranjit Singh was drinking liquor that same evening? And every evening after?

 

 

On 3/10/2022 at 4:28 PM, californiasardar1 said:

Why was my comment disrespectful?

All I said was that he was not a Sikh.

Because you're not a brahamgyani, and therefore you're not a sikh either.

[dallysingh101]

1 hour ago, chatanga1 said:

I don't ever see any muslims questioning the religion or religious attire of support for Palestine, but Sikhs are something else.

This.

Explains a lot. 

[MisterrSingh]

2 hours ago, chatanga1 said:

Well in that case maybe we can ask Martin Docherty-Hughes, MP, who has relentlessly pursued Jagtar's case to shut up, as he is not Sikh enough?

Or tell Pat McFadden who worked tirelessly for Sikh interests in Panjab and UK for the l;ast 20 years, that he was a hypocrite?

I don't ever see any muslims questioning the religion or religious attire of support for Palestine, but Sikhs are something else.

I personally knew a mona guy married to a hindu woman, (not anand karaj) who is one of the brightest and sharpest minds I've seen when it comes to "Sikh interests" but it would be ok to argue he's a hypocrite I guess.

I blame CaliforniaSardar. He gets me worked up and then slips away so I take the flak.

I just don't think much of celebrities tbf. Civilians I don't have a problem with. I think it's an absolute indictment on the state of modern citizenry that these people are the few voices that get heard. It rubs me up the wrong way regardless of their intentions. I don't want them speaking for me.

[dallysingh101]

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

I blame CaliforniaSardar. He gets me worked up and then slips away so I take the flak.

I just don't think much of celebrities tbf. Civilians I don't have a problem with. I think it's an absolute indictment on the state of modern citizenry that these people are the few voices that get heard. It rubs me up the wrong way regardless of their intentions. I don't want them speaking for me.

I think once you're in the bhangra 'industry' the ahhm jut quickly develops a soft spot for you? Next thing you know - you're a politician! 

 

[chatanga1]

18 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

I just don't think much of celebrities tbf. Civilians I don't have a problem with. I think it's an absolute indictment on the state of modern citizenry that these people are the few voices that get heard. It rubs me up the wrong way regardless of their intentions. I don't want them speaking for me.

Who cares what you want? A thousand of you would not or could not bring the international spotlight on farmers protest like Rihanna's tweet did. Celebrity endorsements are endorsements that carry more weight than you, me and my false ego x 1000.

Even that vacuous bimbo Kim Kardashian generated world-wide interest in Turkey's genocide of Armenia, when she attended the annual remembrance of it. Otherwise who would have been aware of it?