Jump to content

ex sikhs are not sikhs


joker
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Wow, that's interesting.

It's clear as the day that the whites will die out because they're having 1.5 or less children per couple, and the Muslims are having 4.

The whites are stupid, but then so are we.

Not so much die out in terms of extinction, but simply - through the inevitable and steady growth of demographics - will be replaced and eventually become a minority. This isn't going to happen anytime soon, but the social and political policies to achieve that end in the FUTURE are being put into place NOW. In third-world countries, genocide is used to achieve the same end. In first-world countries, the media, the political class, and other barely perceptible (in the short term) methods are employed. It's nothing personal, it's just a matter of economics. We're all economic units at the end of the day. What "they've" got us fighting about are things that they're using as fronts to achieve their plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Do you realise the implication of what you're suggesting? A lifetime of lifetimes of good karams leading to a Sikh birth suddenly negated in a few moments through temptation? Are karams so flimsy? Is kamai such a weak joke?

Even those who are supposedly making the most of their Sikh janam, what sets them apart from others? What are they DOING in a tangible sense that's making a difference?

well we are in kalyug are we not? Gurbani talks about how even saints will become corrupted in Kalyug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

A lifetime of lifetimes of good karams leading to a Sikh birth suddenly negated in a few moments through temptation?

Well, Gurbani does talk about slipping when you've reached the pinnacle:

ਮਾਣਸ ਕਉ ਪ੍ਰਭਿ ਦੀਈ ਵਡਿਆਈ ॥
ਇਸੁ ਪਉੜੀ ਤੇ ਜੋ ਨਰੁ ਚੂਕੈ ਸੋ ਆਇ ਜਾਇ ਦੁਖੁ ਪਾਇਦਾ ॥੨॥

The Lord blessed mankind with glory. That human who falls on this ladder step, shall suffer the pains of coming and going in reincarnation. ||2|| p1075

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

He's a very slippery customer. I use to listen to his LBC afternoon talk show on the weekend for years, and if you read between the lines he's basically advocating the same outcomes being promoted by his Jihadi brothers, except the mad Jihadis want it all NOW, whereas Nawaaz has clocked onto the fact that the West's mad political and social policies will deliver those same outcomes in the distant future. His demented Islamic mates are too low-IQ to understand that Nawaaz is playing the long-game; they want a mad Mullah shouting about the Islamic crescent flag waving over Buckingham Palace, whereas Nawaaz realises that's not the way to get things done.

I get that aspect. They are all playing that game.

I think even some sullay actually see us akin to tragic indigenous people in colonised lands - dying a slow death. 

I don't see things like that myself, because I believe we have more potential agency in changing things, than many I guess. 

I think I just had an epiphany about out historiography. Will discuss it later.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Well, Gurbani does talk about slipping when you've reached the pinnacle:

ਮਾਣਸ ਕਉ ਪ੍ਰਭਿ ਦੀਈ ਵਡਿਆਈ ॥
ਇਸੁ ਪਉੜੀ ਤੇ ਜੋ ਨਰੁ ਚੂਕੈ ਸੋ ਆਇ ਜਾਇ ਦੁਖੁ ਪਾਇਦਾ ॥੨॥

The Lord blessed mankind with glory. That human who falls on this ladder step, shall suffer the pains of coming and going in reincarnation. ||2|| p1075

Seems like a stacked game where the only loser is Man, who, ironically, has the least power to affect the outcome, but who is expected to give the most in a desperate uphill struggle that he can never win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Not so much die out in terms of extinction, but simply - through the inevitable and steady growth of demographics - will be replaced and eventually become a minority.

If whites continue to have 1.5 or so babies per woman, they are headed for eventual extinction. They need to have 2 or so babies per woman to maintain their population.

Before they become extinct, they'll be outnumbered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BhForce said:

If whites continue to have 1.5 or so babies per woman, they are headed for eventual extinction. They need to have 2 or so babies per woman to maintain their population.

Before they become extinct, they'll be outnumbered.

They've never had that kind of situation on their doorstep, in their face, as it were. Their entire "programming" has lead them to believe their land is a fortress that can never be breached. I do wonder how they'll respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Not so much die out in terms of extinction, but simply - through the inevitable and steady growth of demographics - will be replaced and eventually become a minority. This isn't going to happen anytime soon, but the social and political policies to achieve that end in the FUTURE are being put into place NOW. In third-world countries, genocide is used to achieve the same end. In first-world countries, the media, the political class, and other barely perceptible (in the short term) methods are employed. It's nothing personal, it's just a matter of economics. We're all economic units at the end of the day. What "they've" got us fighting about are things that they're using as fronts to achieve their plans.

I don't think this will happen now. The Ukraine conflict brought out what they think about POC. I think we underestimate them. If they are saying things like this openly how come they have not thought about these other things like demography.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Wow, that's interesting.

It's clear as the day that the whites will die out because they're having 1.5 or less children per couple, and the Muslims are having 4.

The whites are stupid, but then so are we.

I've spoke to some whites about this. The educated ones see it as a natural outcome not to fight. Natural processes. Some working class ones are a bit more resistant, but even they are full of shyte when it comes to having sullah money invested in this country i.e. big construction projects and football teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sri Kesgarh Sahib (and Akaal Takht) has always allowed eating meat for those who take Amrit there, as long as it's not ritually killed like halaal.  They've followed the official Sikh Rehat Maryada since it was made in the 30s, before that they were Nihang Maryada who also allow meat. So no Panj Pyaare have ever mandated being veg at Anandpur Sahib. You can read the full Sikh Rehat Maryada in English, it includes the Panj Pyaare are meant to say on the day (page 57 I believe). My cousin took Amrit at Anandpur Sahib and my other one in Darbar Sahib 8 years later. I recently showed them both this page and they said that's exactly what the Panj said to them word for word at their Sanchaars
    • Anandpur Sahib does and always has followed the Sikh Rehat Maryada, same as Darbar Sahib in Amritsar. They allow you to eat any eggs, fish or meat as long it is not Halal meat/killed Ritualistically. They say Kes is the Kakkar, not Keski. I believe only AKJ says that and nobody else. You can read the full Sikh Rehat Maryada, page 56-7 I believe is what the Panj Pyaare are meant to say on the day. My cousin took Amrit at Anandpur Sahib and the other in Darbar Sahib 8 years later. I showed them both this page and they said that is exactly what the Panj said to them word for word at their Sanchaar
    • All Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to it by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? Obviously doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib cos they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • There's no debate that all Sikhs must recite Rehras Sahib daily but Chaupai Sahib and the short Anand Sahib were only added to "Rehras Sahib" by SGPC and other jathebandis in the 1900s. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji's saroop, "Sodar Rehras" appears from "So dar tera keha" to "Saran pare ki rakho sarma", which is basically the first half of "Rehras" in all standard Gutka Sahibaan. So why do we recite these? I agree doing more Baani can never be bad, but most Amritdharis recite Benti Chaupai and Anand Sahib in their morning Nitnem so why should we recite these two Baania again instead of a new one? That time could be used to read Shastar Naam Mala, Shabad Hazaare etc. And why do these two Baanis get more importance than the others? Surely if we recite Chaupai Sahib and (part of) Anand Sahib twice in a day then we should also recite Japji Sahib, Jaap Sahib and Tav Prasad Savaiya twice as well? Note: Pls correct me if I'm wrong about SGPC. My theory is that they added these into Rehras Sahib as they removed them from the morning Baania but still had to include them in the daily Nitnem somehow, but this doesn't explain why older Samparde like Budha Dal also have this version of Rehras Sahib in their Gutkeh - someone enlighten Daas pls Bhul Chuk Maaf
    • Uncle, realistically are you gonna challenge it in real life? I could fully jhatka and eat a steak wearing Bana bilkul tere samne but on God you could do nothing about that 😂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use