Jump to content

ex sikhs are not sikhs


joker
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Wow, that's interesting.

It's clear as the day that the whites will die out because they're having 1.5 or less children per couple, and the Muslims are having 4.

The whites are stupid, but then so are we.

Not so much die out in terms of extinction, but simply - through the inevitable and steady growth of demographics - will be replaced and eventually become a minority. This isn't going to happen anytime soon, but the social and political policies to achieve that end in the FUTURE are being put into place NOW. In third-world countries, genocide is used to achieve the same end. In first-world countries, the media, the political class, and other barely perceptible (in the short term) methods are employed. It's nothing personal, it's just a matter of economics. We're all economic units at the end of the day. What "they've" got us fighting about are things that they're using as fronts to achieve their plans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Do you realise the implication of what you're suggesting? A lifetime of lifetimes of good karams leading to a Sikh birth suddenly negated in a few moments through temptation? Are karams so flimsy? Is kamai such a weak joke?

Even those who are supposedly making the most of their Sikh janam, what sets them apart from others? What are they DOING in a tangible sense that's making a difference?

well we are in kalyug are we not? Gurbani talks about how even saints will become corrupted in Kalyug.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

A lifetime of lifetimes of good karams leading to a Sikh birth suddenly negated in a few moments through temptation?

Well, Gurbani does talk about slipping when you've reached the pinnacle:

ਮਾਣਸ ਕਉ ਪ੍ਰਭਿ ਦੀਈ ਵਡਿਆਈ ॥
ਇਸੁ ਪਉੜੀ ਤੇ ਜੋ ਨਰੁ ਚੂਕੈ ਸੋ ਆਇ ਜਾਇ ਦੁਖੁ ਪਾਇਦਾ ॥੨॥

The Lord blessed mankind with glory. That human who falls on this ladder step, shall suffer the pains of coming and going in reincarnation. ||2|| p1075

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

He's a very slippery customer. I use to listen to his LBC afternoon talk show on the weekend for years, and if you read between the lines he's basically advocating the same outcomes being promoted by his Jihadi brothers, except the mad Jihadis want it all NOW, whereas Nawaaz has clocked onto the fact that the West's mad political and social policies will deliver those same outcomes in the distant future. His demented Islamic mates are too low-IQ to understand that Nawaaz is playing the long-game; they want a mad Mullah shouting about the Islamic crescent flag waving over Buckingham Palace, whereas Nawaaz realises that's not the way to get things done.

I get that aspect. They are all playing that game.

I think even some sullay actually see us akin to tragic indigenous people in colonised lands - dying a slow death. 

I don't see things like that myself, because I believe we have more potential agency in changing things, than many I guess. 

I think I just had an epiphany about out historiography. Will discuss it later.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Well, Gurbani does talk about slipping when you've reached the pinnacle:

ਮਾਣਸ ਕਉ ਪ੍ਰਭਿ ਦੀਈ ਵਡਿਆਈ ॥
ਇਸੁ ਪਉੜੀ ਤੇ ਜੋ ਨਰੁ ਚੂਕੈ ਸੋ ਆਇ ਜਾਇ ਦੁਖੁ ਪਾਇਦਾ ॥੨॥

The Lord blessed mankind with glory. That human who falls on this ladder step, shall suffer the pains of coming and going in reincarnation. ||2|| p1075

Seems like a stacked game where the only loser is Man, who, ironically, has the least power to affect the outcome, but who is expected to give the most in a desperate uphill struggle that he can never win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Not so much die out in terms of extinction, but simply - through the inevitable and steady growth of demographics - will be replaced and eventually become a minority.

If whites continue to have 1.5 or so babies per woman, they are headed for eventual extinction. They need to have 2 or so babies per woman to maintain their population.

Before they become extinct, they'll be outnumbered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BhForce said:

If whites continue to have 1.5 or so babies per woman, they are headed for eventual extinction. They need to have 2 or so babies per woman to maintain their population.

Before they become extinct, they'll be outnumbered.

They've never had that kind of situation on their doorstep, in their face, as it were. Their entire "programming" has lead them to believe their land is a fortress that can never be breached. I do wonder how they'll respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Not so much die out in terms of extinction, but simply - through the inevitable and steady growth of demographics - will be replaced and eventually become a minority. This isn't going to happen anytime soon, but the social and political policies to achieve that end in the FUTURE are being put into place NOW. In third-world countries, genocide is used to achieve the same end. In first-world countries, the media, the political class, and other barely perceptible (in the short term) methods are employed. It's nothing personal, it's just a matter of economics. We're all economic units at the end of the day. What "they've" got us fighting about are things that they're using as fronts to achieve their plans.

I don't think this will happen now. The Ukraine conflict brought out what they think about POC. I think we underestimate them. If they are saying things like this openly how come they have not thought about these other things like demography.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BhForce said:

Wow, that's interesting.

It's clear as the day that the whites will die out because they're having 1.5 or less children per couple, and the Muslims are having 4.

The whites are stupid, but then so are we.

I've spoke to some whites about this. The educated ones see it as a natural outcome not to fight. Natural processes. Some working class ones are a bit more resistant, but even they are full of shyte when it comes to having sullah money invested in this country i.e. big construction projects and football teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use