Jump to content

ex sikhs are not sikhs


joker
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

They've never had that kind of situation on their doorstep, in their face, as it were. Their entire "programming" has lead them to believe their land is a fortress that can never be breached. I do wonder how they'll respond.

Nah, you're wrong, they are VERY concerned about being breached right now. That's what will push them to go stronger with removing immigrants (esp. nonwhite ones), and assimilation drives (which usually target malleable, attractive ethnic women). They'll also try and re-implement the strategy they tried in the recent past and try and make our lives as difficult as possible at ground level. 

Some of them have kept up their rawness during their retreating into the woodwork phase. They can see the condition of our younger generation. A lot of their younger ones have been taught about how their fathers/uncles openly treated ethnics as a model to re-establish if possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Seems like a stacked game where the only loser is Man, who, ironically, has the least power to affect the outcome, but who is expected to give the most in a desperate uphill struggle that he can never win.

Well, that's the perspective of Gurbani that everything is within God's hands:
ਸੋਈ ਹੋਇ ਜਿ ਕਰਤੇ ਭਾਵੈ ਕਹਿ ਕੈ ਆਪੁ ਵਞਾਵਣਾ ॥੧੩॥

That alone happens, which is pleasing to the Creator; speaking of himself, the mortal loses himself. ||13|| p1086

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Some of them have kept up their rawness during their retreating into the woodwork phase. They can see the condition of our younger generation. A lot of their younger ones have been taught about how their fathers/uncles openly treated ethnics as a model to re-establish if possible. 

Who? The ones cutting their cocks off and pretending to be women? The ones who are terrified of being "cancelled" for even looking at an ethnic the wrong way, lol? The ones running off to the Mediterranean to escape the brown folk? Where do you live where society still functions according to the social mores of 1950-1985?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Their political leadership is going to abandon them. Their media / press class despises them.

You're still labouring under the mistaken belief that the People and their Leaders are one. Wake up. It's too late in the game to be clinging to 70-80 year old narratives. The world has changed, is changing, and will continue to change beyond recognition.

You don't even see what's under your nose. I've seen the links between middle england and the working class.  It isn't non-existent, as you seem to be under the illusion of. 

I'm not talking about formal relationships, but things unspoken but clearly understood in that society. Something we don't do well at all (if we do it at all). 

Things don't usually change, they just go around in cycles. The one coming is obvious. It's only rural dimwits that don't see these things until they are upon us - as evidenced at partition.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Who? The ones cutting their cocks off and pretending to be women? The ones who are terrified of being "cancelled" for even looking at an ethnic the wrong way, lol? The ones running off to the Mediterranean to escape the brown folk? Where do you live where society still functions according to the social mores of 1950-1985?

Bro, I think you've been hanging around gays and pu55ies too much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

You don't even see what's under your nose. I've seen the links between middle england and the working class.  It isn't non-existent, as you seem to be under the illusion of. 

I'm not talking about formal relationships, but things unspoken but clearly understood in that society. Something we don't do well at all (if we do it at all). 

Things don't usually change, they just go around in cycles. The one coming is obvious. It's only rural dimwits that don't see these things until they are upon us - as evidenced at partition.  

 

3 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Bro, I think you've been hanging around gays and pu55ies too much. 

It's an absolute waste of time trying to discuss these issues with you. Your hatred for whites and your complete denial of reality because it'll rock everything you believe in means there's just no point in trying to get to the bottom of these issues with you.

I understand these issues VERY well, more than you'll ever appreciate. You're neuroses, whatever they are, will keep you ignorant and afraid. Unless you have something fresh to add, jog on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, proactive said:

That's where we differ, you think Singh Sabha was a British creation while I see them as acting to save Sikhi from being just another Panth. If anything their sanatan opponents were the ones who thought you could worship at a Mandir in the morning, a Sufi shrine in the afternoon and a Gurdwara in the evening and you could still call yourself a Sikh. 

I get what you are saying, it's just that demarcation between Sikhs and other panths (that was always there) wasn't built along abrahamic type/dualistic notions. It was along different lines.

It's a complicated matter, that requires further studying. Even I'm not claiming to fully understand it, but to think we were colonised for a century and not heavily manipulated (by people with a long history and experience in this) seems to be bordering on the delusional. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use