Jump to content

Bhai Dharam Singh nihang


TuhadaDaas
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

He is a heretic. His views are very missionary like. Only difference between him and missionaries is that he believes in Dasam Granth while missionaries don't. But otherwise their beliefs, ideology is identical. From my interaction with Dharm Singh's chellas online, they are worse than missionaries. They insult our Shaheeds especially if that Shaheed is associated with the Taksal. 

They just look like Nihangs, but there is absolutely nothing Nihang like about them. Wolves in sheep's clothing. Dharam Singh also has close relations with prominent missionaries. They invite him to give lectures to their so called college since their heretical ideology is the same

Very interesting. 

Which Shaheeds did he disrespect?

That's the stuff I dont like

What kind of ideology have you encountered that's in line with missionaries?

I'm still ignorant of what missionaries are to a degree but getting an idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jonny101 said:

They don't believe in any of the core Sikh beliefs. They don't believe in Naam Simran, Amritvela, concept of reincarnation or even concept of bad or good Karmas (paap or Punn) in relation to reincarnation. They talk against doing Yatra to historical Gurdwaras. Whenever Gurbani mentions anything they don't agree with they call it metaphor.

His Chellas are the worst people I have encountered. Worse than missionaries. I have encountered his Chellas who insult Kharku Singhs on Facebook. Dharma is a GOI agent like Dhandri.

 

Skirt. ..... ... ..Hold up. ....

Shukria Veer Ji. I appreciate that response. 

Kalyug. Can never decide whether to laugh or cry. 

Vaheguru Vaheguru Chardikala

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I don’t think he’s going to Pesh, as his branch of Nihangs, (as well as chelas), don’t recognize either the SGPC Jathedar nor the Sarbat Khalsa Jathedar, they believe Buddha Dal should have rule over Akal Takht.

generally Nihang Singhs don't bow down to any authority except Guru, and since the Akal Takht is "occupied" and currently not recognised as the Akali Bunga, I don't see why they would bow down to any SGPC associated president-jathedaar, just doesn't fit into their ideology,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, dharamyudh said:

Yup. Nihangs, with the exception with Balbir's group, don't care what the SGPC has to say. So in essence, a tankhaiya from them really doesn't even matter. They don't even consider these guys as the panth. Nihangs only answer to Dal Panth and the Jathedar only. 

Who do mainstream Nihangs consider as Buddha Dal Jathedar? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 11/10/2021 at 1:29 PM, ipledgeblue said:

generally Nihang Singhs don't bow down to any authority except Guru, and since the Akal Takht is "occupied" and currently not recognised as the Akali Bunga, I don't see why they would bow down to any SGPC associated president-jathedaar, just doesn't fit into their ideology,

 

On 11/10/2021 at 11:39 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

I don’t think he’s going to Pesh, as his branch of Nihangs, (as well as chelas), don’t recognize either the SGPC Jathedar nor the Sarbat Khalsa Jathedar, they believe Buddha Dal should have rule over Akal Takht.

He (Dharam singh) don’t belive in rule. He belive in hukam. Only god can rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/10/2021 at 12:25 PM, dharamyudh said:

Yup. Nihangs, with the exception with Balbir's group, don't care what the SGPC has to say. So in essence, a tankhaiya from them really doesn't even matter. They don't even consider these guys as the panth. 

So why do "Nihangs" accept donations from "average" Sikhs if the latter are not part of what they consider the Panth?

Guru Nanak Dev ji says:

ਜੇ ਓਇ ਦਿਸਹਿ ਨਰਕਿ ਜਾਂਦੇ ਤਾਂ ਉਨ੍ਹ ਕਾ ਦਾਨੁ ਨ ਲੈਣਾ ॥
If they (deesah-i) are seen by you (jaandy) going (narak-i) to hell, then you should not (lainaa) be taking (aunh) their (daan-u) charity.
ਦੇਂਦਾ ਨਰਕਿ ਸੁਰਗਿ ਲੈਦੇ ਦੇਖਹੁ ਏਹੁ ਧਿਙਾਣਾ ॥
(Deykhahu) look at (ehu) this (dhinknaana) injustice;whereby (deynda) the giver goes (narak-i) to hell and (laidey) the receivers (surag-i) to heaven.

p1289

On 11/10/2021 at 12:25 PM, dharamyudh said:

 Nihangs only answer to Dal Panth and the Jathedar only. 

OK, so why does "Dharam" Singh say the bakwas that he says? Nihangs don't preach all the stuff that he says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
    • Good way of putting it, bro. One of the ongoing themes of Gurbani is the fake saint. Whether it's fake babas in Punjab or English-speaking personalities in the West, it's an continuing problem of religion through the centuries (and it's not exclusive to us by any means, this applies to all human societies).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use