Jump to content

Thoughts / Opinions on the Future of Western Countries


MisterrSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Dutch messed that up probably for generations. 

It's a mess but karmas a .....

That is an example of a people that now in power, once over the hump of racism and power shift that still targets them, could become reactionary racists. 

I'd suggest the previous slave owners leave. 

A lot of.the whites have left, like in Zimbabwe. A lot of them are in UK 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/13/2021 at 4:40 AM, MisterrSingh said:

I give the Puritan settlers their dues without diminishing their inhumane treatment of the natives. I can hold two conflicting concepts in my mind without grounding to a halt. 

That sounds schizo to me. But I expect no less from you. It's like the mor0ns back home preaching Sikhi, but then turning a blind eye to rampant apartied style casteism that takes place under their very nose. 

No integrity at all. 

This is hypocrisy to the highest level. 

Back to the topic: Then after we've acknowledged what happened to the natives over there (like this wasn't indicative), factor in the way they then subsequently dragged MILLIONS of women and men and children from Africa, placed them under the most vile and evil of situations. There is an evil persistence going on here. And just because some selfish evil African 'overlords' would sell their own out, doesn't justify the 'american's' actions. 

But I know that you might well have some genetic disposition to position yourself as some parasite with such people, hence your lack of integrity on these matters. I guess if I felt (even on some subconscious level) that I belonged to a tribe/race/caste that is really incapable of grand developments and developing an advance society (outside of some feudal backwardness), then I'd too probably REALLY look up to such people as role models?

And I've never ground to halt in my life yet, I've always been active - just so you know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

That sounds schizo to me. But I expect no less from you. It's like the mor0ns back home preaching Sikhi, but then turning a blind eye to rampant apartied style casteism that takes place under their very nose. 

No integrity at all. 

This is hypocrisy to the highest level. 

Unlike you I have no intention of spending my entire life flogging a dead horse. Ideas need to be taken out into the real world where history isn't a one dimensional narrative of good vs evil. Unfortunately, your approach to understanding things would lead to much derision and merriment at the stupidity and simple-minded nature of Sikhs. Never mind, you can always claim to be a "jutt." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Unlike you I have no intention of spending my entire life flogging a dead horse. Ideas need to be taken out into the real world where history isn't a one dimensional narrative of good vs evil. Unfortunately, your approach to understanding things would lead to much derision and merriment at the stupidity and simple-minded nature of Sikhs. Never mind, you can always claim to be a "jutt." 

This ain't about simplistic binary conceptualisations, but for a people constantly complaining about oppression, you seem pretty oblivious to brutality pointed at others over a long period. But that's cool. If karma exists as according to Sikhi, a people's own indifference to the sustained oppression of others and identification  with the oppressors, will come back and haunt their own community when it all comes around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Christ, the cognitive dissonance is off the charts. Acknowledging one true statement is the automatic denial of another simultaneously true statement? Go back and tell me where I failed to acknowledge and refused to pass judgement on the Native American genocide. Go on.

What you wanted to hear from me was, "Grrr, whitey bad, grrr, whitey burn in hell. Red Indians honourable, red Indians good" and when that wasn't forthcoming, you resorted to your emotional Marxist relativism. 

There's a saying that whomever wants to stop you from thinking is not a friend; in fact that person is an enemy. Why can't I acknowledge the great achievement of the Puritan settlers in establishing themselves in a foreign land while still being disgusted at their treatment of the natives? Why do you wish to funnel and limit my thoughts?

Plus, it's quite telling how you seem to disassociate yourself from the struggles of your co-religionists by terming them as "a people" indicating they exclusively belong to someone of my background. For someone who's chiefly identified as being ardently "caste blind", you sure as hell seem to relish the misfortunes of a certain group that isn't "yours". I guess if they were Kenyan carpenters you'd have been on the first plane out there to stand in solidarity with your brothers and sisters.

The rest of your nonsense is lifted from points I myself have made in previous days about the selective application of karmic rules by a few people on this forum, so why are you presenting this reasoning as if it's alien to me? 

You use to be able to (barely) conceal your glee at the misfortunes of "jutts" (in your mind I guess you see them being representative of Sikhs in general). Now you seem to openly revel in their struggles and humiliation. Again, I guess not having any skin in the game renders them "not yours."  At least try to pretend you aren't entirely delighted at their impending destruction. You're getting sloppy.

Great post brother.Are you sure you're really not a psychologist?Part time maybe??I second your view that people should not shout down your throat to further their agenda.Everyone has their own valid view that should be equally respected as long as they are reasonable.This is a discussion forum,lets discuss and not belittle or mock others for not having the same view as us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use