Jump to content

Equality during Anand Karaj


Guest manjeetayjagjeet
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Mr Lynx

Lol what an insane topic!!!

Tbh I think if it was a choice she'd be walking in front and her husband behind her wearing the churiyah cause we can all see what's going to happen to the poor guy during this union.

I'm in disbelief at the stupidity of some of our younger generation!

Shes been given some great advice here let's hope she takes it onboard and leaves her ego behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Jai Tegang! said:

I still like koi's argument about orbital distance. Infact, the outer partner will have to increase speed while covering a larger distance to maintain equal timing upon arrival at the starting point. 

True that person on the outside will have to walk faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2021 at 2:07 PM, Guest guest said:

i'm a firm traditionalist and a male.  however even i would find this explanation demeaning if i wear a woman.  

Would be interesting to see what are your "Firm Traditionalist" views. Now don't do ghosting traditionalist male ji. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Purataan Sikh

Now, I have heard a lot of people object to your stance by telling you that it is just "tradition" but not many have explained why and that is the problem in the Panth, we have gone away from the tradition so much we forgot the orginal practices of Sikhi. Gurbani, Rehitnamay and history all clearly agree that the Man is the head of the family and should be considered as "Pati-Parmeshar (Husband as God). Since the Man is the head, then there is no way that he should be lead by the wife, especially during the Laavan. This would indicate that the women is the leader of the relationship. This is weather you want to believe in it or not, the reality, If women started serving their husbands as such then we would have many more Chardi Kala Singhniaan in the Panth. This doesn't mean that the Women is lower, or cant achieve the same spiritual level as a Man, but their Dharam in the household is different than that of the man. Men too have to start acting as such as they too have been feminized to think they need to bow down to their wives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use