Jump to content

True Crime Shaun Attwood feat Wlliam Wong


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

You should read up on the rumours about his uncle, Lord Mountbatten. It's a sordid nest of filth. 

I've read a little about him, wasn't it the fbi that exposed him? apparently he liked teenage boys in uniforms. He was Charles' "mentor" so it's no surprise Charles finds himself surrounded by sex offenders and paedos   lol        

His poor wife ended up having affairs with every man in sight, including Nehru!  her own daughter called her a "man-eater" !! 

 

It just shows you how brainwashed some of the British public are, waving stupid at Royal weddings and all the rest. How many sex offenders and paedos have these people been linked to. 

How did the Queens husband, a man in his late 90s survive after his car crashed and flipped? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

@GurjantGnostic That's the one. I wonder how much of the actual truth about the Irish troubles are withheld from the public, especially when it comes to the IRA discovering the English establishment's dirty secrets?

We had a long time to witness who knows what before the IRA even came to be. We're convinced of one thing. Those are the devils people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, puzzled said:

It just shows you how brainwashed some of the British public are, waving stupid at Royal weddings and all the rest. How many sex offenders and paedos have these people been linked to. 

Even this week the bulldog, right-wing pr1cks immediately jumped to the defence of the paedo royal family against Harry and his missus. If they were smart they would realise the royals are their enemies and traitors, and even if Markle and her husband are clowns, a tactical show of support to damage a truly nonsense outfit would make sense. Instead, they dance to the beat of the scummy media and tabloids and fake patriotism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, MisterrSingh said:

Even this week the bulldog, right-wing pr1cks immediately jumped to the defence of the paedo royal family against Harry and his missus. If they were smart they would realise the royals are their enemies and traitors, and even if Markle and her husband are clowns, a tactical show of support to damage a truly nonsense outfit would make sense. Instead, they dance to the beat of the scummy media and tabloids and fake patriotism.

Yeah its interesting how the country is divided with their opinions on Harry/Meghan depending on their political views.

40,000 people complained to Ofcom about Piers Morgans behaviour, and then I think around 100,000 complained that they want him back! 

If she was a blonde White woman the right wing lot wouldn't be saying the things they are saying. 

In the last few years I've noticed a rise of interest in the Royals again! It's as if people actually want them!  Why on earth would you want these people. 

But maybe when Charles and that old slapper become King/Queen people might be put off again. They know their not popular and need to tread carefully. Camilla was quite smart in not taking the "Princess of Wales" title. 

But I dont think they'll ever go, they obviously serve a purpose, if they didn't they would have been ditched a long time back like a lot of their European cousins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Yeah its interesting how the country is divided with their opinions on Harry/Meghan depending on their political views.

40,000 people complained to Ofcom about Piers Morgans behaviour, and then I think around 100,000 complained that they want him back! 

If she was a blonde White woman the right wing lot wouldn't be saying the things they are saying. 

In the last few years I've noticed a rise of interest in the Royals again! It's as if people actually want them!  Why on earth would you want these people. 

But maybe when Charles and that old slapper become King/Queen people might be put off again. They know their not popular and need to tread carefully. Camilla was quite smart in not taking the "Princess of Wales" title. 

But I dont think they'll ever go, they obviously serve a purpose, if they didn't they would have been ditched a long time back like a lot of their European cousins. 

If you get rid of the Royal family, what do you replace it with.

You could turn the country into a Republic with a presidency.

But it is said that it is more costly than the current set up.

England in the 1600's got rid of the monarchy when they had the "Lord Protector " Oliver Cromwell. 

But they went back to Monarchy after 11 years.

The monarchy is more of a figurehead,  they have no political power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

If you get rid of the Royal family, what do you replace it with.

You could turn the country into a Republic with a presidency.

But it is said that it is more costly than the current set up.

England in the 1600's got rid of the monarchy when they had the "Lord Protector " Oliver Cromwell. 

But they went back to Monarchy after 11 years.

The monarchy is more of a figurehead,  they have no political power.

Yeah but she was the head of many counties, and they all dumped her ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Yeah but she was the head of many counties, and they all dumped her ? 

She never really had any power. If you are a colonised nation and you liberate yourself, you will have your own heritage, your own history and traditions. You move forward by creating your own identity or reclaiming your identity pre-colonisation. 

If getting rid of the Queen is what needs to be done, then you proceed to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know how much protection the likes of ol' big ears have around them? To be chums with them it's like getting into fort Knox. Same goes for top politicians ...to be in any of their circles you are carefully vetted by various agencies, and those dossiers are given to the said VIPs. All the rumours etc are available to them. When the said VIPs claim they didn't know anything about their dodgy habits that's  utter bs. Everytime a prime minster selects a minister or someone for a job the Intel services give him/her a breakdown on all the secret stuff  know about them . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use