Jump to content

True Crime Shaun Attwood feat Wlliam Wong


Recommended Posts

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/royal-barge-sex-offender-prince-867317

FOR more than 10 years he rubbed shoulders with royalty as a trusted VIP guest of Prince Charles.

But yesterday Harbinder Singh Rana had the red carpet pulled from under his feet – after the Mirror exposed him as a convicted serial sex attacker.

We told how the 52-year-old Sikh community leader was sentenced to four years in jail after posing as a doctor to assault a string of vulnerable women.

And last night he was banished from all future royal events – as Charles hit out furiously after being kept in the dark over Rana’s shameful secret.

The prince is livid that his security staff failed on five occasions to alert him about the charity worker’s criminal convictions – including five counts of indecent assault, 11 counts of assault and one of attempted assault.

HRH Prince of Wales during a visit to Thetford,Norfolk, where he unveiled a statue of the first Sikh settler Maharajah Duleep Singh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/janner-child-abuse-claims-leicestershire-110011353.html

 

The Guardian

Janner child abuse claims: police guilty of failing to investigate, report finds

d06469173fefd0c883766555328da78f
  •  
     
  •  
Haroon Siddique Legal affairs correspondent
Tue, 19 October 2021, 5:06 pm
 
 
In this article:
  •  
     
  • Greville Janner
    British politician, barrister and writer (1928-2015)
 
 

Read more on this topic

 
 

Leicestershire police were guilty of multiple serious and inexcusable failures to properly investigate allegations of child sexual abuse against the late Labour peer Greville Janner, according to a damning report.

The investigation by the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse (IICSA) into the handling of allegations against Lord Janner found that a failure by police to submit statements by two witnesses in 2001 to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) may have been the result of “complacency, incompetence or undue deference to a prominent public figure”. It criticises a “culture of disbelief” at Leicestershire police at the time whereby the credibility of complainants was dismissed.

The IICSA chair, Prof Alexis Jay, who led the inquiry panel, said: “Despite numerous serious allegations against the late Lord Janner, police and prosecutors appeared reluctant to fully investigate the claims against him. On multiple occasions police put too little emphasis on looking for supporting evidence and shut down investigations without pursuing all outstanding inquiries.”

 

Related: Lord Janner child sexual abuse inquiry begins

One officer during Operation Magnolia, which concluded in 2002, told the inquiry there “may have been” a positive instruction not to discuss the Janner allegations at a meeting with the CPS.

The initial failures were compounded by another police investigation, Operation Dauntless, launched in 2006 on the back of another accusation against Janner, which failed to carry out further inquiries into the allegations from Operation Magnolia despite having established that they had never previously been properly investigated and that more junior officers were pressing for this to be done, the panel found. The inquiry heard from some investigating officers who said that Janner was treated differently from “the man on the street” because of who he was, although the panel said it could not determine whether this was the case.

The report, published on Tuesday, is also critical of the CPS advice in 2007, almost eight months after receiving the file, not to arrest, interview or charge Janner, saying it should have recommended further investigations be carried out. “The advice was perfunctory and gave the impression of a complacent attitude and a lack of commitment,” it said. The panel described the decisions of the CPS lawyer and DS Christopher Thomas, who led Dauntless, as “unsound and strategically flawed”, with Thomas described as “uninterested” in the allegations.

Leicestershire county council also attracted reproof for showing “undue deference” to Janner, allowing him “unrestricted access” because of his position as a local MP. While there was no evidence the council was aware of allegations of child sex abuse, the panel said staff “were aware of, and had concerns about, Lord Janner’s association with a child in its care, such that further inquiries about the nature of the association were necessary. This association was facilitated by the informal visiting arrangements that were in existence at the time.”

After another police investigation was launched, Janner was eventually charged in June 2015 with 22 offences of indecent assault and buggery relating to nine separate complainants. This was only after a controversial decision by the CPS earlier that year that it was not in the public interest to prosecute, due to Janner’s dementia, was overturned. The acts were said to have taken place between the mid-1960s and the late 1980s, when the complainants were all aged between eight and 16 years old.

The panel did not seek to examine the truth of the allegations against Janner, who denied them. He died in 2015 – bringing the criminal proceedings to an end.

Leicestershire police, the county council and the CPS all apologised for their past failings and said wholesale changes had been made to the way they handled allegations of child sex abuse, advances which were acknowledged by the report’s authors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use