Jump to content

Mundill Mahil


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

These Singhs are not used to getting female attention.

If they got attention from 5'9" leggy model type Russian blondes, then they probably would have enough self confidence not to be swayed by her.

However, the average looking girl has one thing that the 5'9" leggy blonde does not have and that is they are seen as attainable. 

It's the girl next door vibe. 

 

Why do you go to a tall leggy blonde as an example? No punjabi girl fits that description, so is every punjabi girl seen as "average" and "attainable"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:

 

Why do you go to a tall leggy blonde as an example? No punjabi girl fits that description, so is every punjabi girl seen as "average" and "attainable"?

You really miss the point. 

Look into your biology and not the way you were conditioned to think and it will be very clear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, californiasardar1 said:

I understand the point you are trying to make.

I am taking exception to the example that you used for a desirable woman.

You live in California for goodness sake!

Let me speak in a language you might understand. 

This is just an example:

If I live in L.A where drop dead gorgeous blondes seem to grow on trees where they are like 9's and 10's and I was able to garner attraction from them.

In the attractive ness stakes that would bolster my confidence so when I go to Fresno or Yuba City, the pretty girls there who would be like a 4 or a 5 at best in L.A.

Hope you got the point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Suchi said:

If you notice those in the higher echelons of society value everything over looks, hence why you see many ordinary looking women married to men who would get the pick of the best. I came to the conclusion that they perhaps valued family background, money, education and personality over just looks. In reality people choose people based on how they click and compatibility. 

But that's also the reason for alot of them having extra marital affairs etc. 

Can you give some examples?

it definitely works that way for women choosing men in all sectors of society, but men who are at least average looking rarely seem to have anything less than average attractive partner

It’s not the reason that I can see for most affairs

if the man is a lot older than the woman might not be very attractive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Can you give some examples?

I won't speak for the guy, but from my perspective we only have to look at the example of marriages between royal houses throughout history. Did they get married solely for love? Of course not. Those unions were designed to forge and strengthen alliances for material purposes. There was hardly any consideration of physical appeal ASIDE from a breeding perspective where an attractive bride for a plain groom was considered to be essential in order to at lease increase the chance of an aesthetically pleasing heir, i.e. Diana and Charles. The key issue was producing heirs and ensuring the wealth remained (and increased) within that relatively small clique of families.

This cultural obsession with "love" really only became culturally fashionable arguably in the Edwardian and Victorian era, and even then it was "pushed" as an ideal on the lowly masses. The elites were certainly never expected to follow suit, and, by and large, they haven't with a few obvious exceptions. Even their so-called love unions are far from the lucky meetings of fate they like to promote to the people. Diana was distant relation to the Windsors. I even remember reading that Kate Middleton and even Markle are somehow related to the Royal Family through their respective ancestries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

I've never heard of the forename and the surname of the girl. Has it been wrongly spelled by the media, or is it not that common?

I've got extended family with the surname "Mahal" so Mahil might be the same but with different spellings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use