Jump to content

Mundill Mahil


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

 

Gagandip Singh wasn't in a relationship. There was no "breakup."

He was a desperate, thirsty guy hopelessly infatuated with a girl who had friendzoned him.

 

Yes, she was indeed average looking. The fact that THREE singhs (not one, not two, but THREE) ruined their lives over her shows how desperate singhs are in general.

I disagree with that. I've come across a lot more thirsty monay than Singhs, in fact monay are quite open about the thirst, which isn't surprising considering dating and other things are a part of mona culture. 

Singhs in general are more grounded. The "thirsty" ones are the ones that come from very religious families where interaction with the opposite gender is frowned upon. The minute a girl smiles at them and says hi, they think she likes them.

Girls from really religious families can be a bit creepy as well, Mahil gives me those creepy vibes. She's a freak behind closed doors. 

Insecurity also plays a part in it aswell. Men who are confident in themselves, they don't behave like that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Girls from really religious families can be a bit creepy as well, Mahil gives me those creepy vibes. She's a freak behind closed doors.

It's a shame because from a purely visual perspective she was perfect wife and mother-of-your-kids material.

Attractive enough to appeal to the male gaze, but not TOO attractive that she's had every guy in a 10 mile radius drooling after her since she turned 16 (thus increasing the probability that she'd be seduced in her teens). Even then, her being just a little above average, she's had Singhs killing each other to get with her, which is mental. What do the Punjabi kudiyan who look like a Kardashian get-up to?!? It doesn't bear thinking.

Is it nature or nurture, though? I hope it's nurture, because if slutty behaviour is inherent, then God has deserted us. ??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Even then, her being just a little above average, she's had Singhs killing each other to get with her, which is mental. What do the Punjabi kudiyan who look like a Kardashian get-up to?!? It doesn't bear thinking.

Is it nature or nurture, though? I hope it's nurture, because if slutty behaviour is inherent, then God has deserted us. ??

This is what I have tried to explain to the other posters here.

She is like a '5' or a '6'.

She is the "girl next door" that is seen as "attainable "

The Punjabi kudiyan who are like an '8' would not give the brown guy the time of the day, let alone a Singh. 

They go straight for the well off white guy.

I have female cousins like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, puzzled said:

Its interesting though, Pubjabis especially the older generation believe that its nature, lol.

Like when aunties are talking about some female who turned out to be a s1ut, you always hear one of them mentioning something like how the dadhi also ran a way with a truck driver back in the old days, lol

It's the same with men. When some guy has a reputation for sleeping around etc he always gets compared to his dad if the dad was upto the same back in the days.

My interpretation of this is that Punjabis, especially the middle aged lot believe that s1utty behaviour is inherited lol 

And! they're not that wrong a lot of the time ?

 

My dad used to say that.

If you want to know what the girl is like, look at the mother. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

My dad used to say that.

If you want to know what the girl is like, look at the mother. 

It's true though, the aunties aren't far off when they compare men/women with loose morals to their parents. A lot of the time it is true. 

But obviously in today's day and age it would be considered unfair, and I can see why it is unfair, but you can't deny the comparisons. 

The people I went to school with, the ones that ended up sleeping around etc their parents were basically doing the same when they were younger. 

That's why the previous generation used to say its important to look at the the ways and behaviours of the family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

It's a shame because from a purely visual perspective she was perfect wife and mother-of-your-kids material.

Attractive enough to appeal to the male gaze, but not TOO attractive that she's had every guy in a 10 mile radius drooling after her since she turned 16 (thus increasing the probability that she'd be seduced in her teens). Even then, her being just a little above average, she's had Singhs killing each other to get with her, which is mental. What do the Punjabi kudiyan who look like a Kardashian get-up to?!? It doesn't bear thinking.

Is it nature or nurture, though? I hope it's nurture, because if slutty behaviour is inherent, then God has deserted us. ??

Im surprised you think she is attractive. 
by Punjabi standards nothing above average at all IMO

2 hours ago, puzzled said:

 

Girls from really religious families can be a bit creepy as well, Mahil gives me those creepy vibes. She's a freak behind closed doors. 

 

I don’t think her family was particularly religious, conservative maybe

I agree though that there is something ‘off’ about her which means I would not trust her or believe her side of the story fully

i wonder what this Shoker’s background was ? He was up to no good, and his mate a criminal . I would guess his parents were recentish immigrants and lived in a council estate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Im surprised you think she is attractive. 
by Punjabi standards nothing above average at all IMO

You didn't understand what I wrote.

I said she was wife and mother material. A woman doesn't have to be a stunner to be a wife or a mother. 

I stated she was attractive ENOUGH to stir a man's passions, but not attractive to the point of distraction.

Later on, I literally stated she was slightly above average.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Premi5 said:

Im surprised you think she is attractive. 
by Punjabi standards nothing above average at all IMO

I don’t think her family was particularly religious, conservative maybe

I agree though that there is something ‘off’ about her which means I would not trust her or believe her side of the story fully

i wonder what this Shoker’s background was ? He was up to no good, and his mate a criminal . I would guess his parents were recentish immigrants and lived in a council estate 

A lot of the pictures are of her as someone who is nearly 30.

The crime happened when she was 20.

Plus the fact she was in prison, so it will take it's toll on her. 

A lot of women are at their peak attractive ness in the early 20's. Which is the reason why girls get pushed to get married.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Premi5 said:

don’t think her family was particularly religious, conservative maybe

I agree though that there is something ‘off’ about her which means I would not trust her or believe her side of the story fully

i wonder what this Shoker’s background was ? He was up to no good, and his mate a criminal . I would guess his parents were recentish immigrants and lived in a council estate 

Yeah I'd imagine she had a conservative upbringing, and then started getting attention from these men. 

There's a big difference between conservative and traditional. Just because you're traditional don't mean you are conservative. Like I'd describe my family as "traditional" but far from conservative. 

Its these boys and girls from conservative families that become weird and freaky. 

Like those kids from proper conservative Christian families, the girls end up becoming s1uts after the first bit of male attention.

I think traditional, yet not strict, is the right way, if you do it properly. Especially for Sikhi. But tradition can go wrong too! if you do it the wrong way! 

Going the complete opposite of traditional just makes you into your average White family, coconuts. 

Yeah the Shokar guy probably saw himself as a hero saving Mandil. Probably thought he would get her, or a bit of her in return.  Silly man. 

Yeah he possibly moved to the UK as a kid with recent immigrant parents. Those kids end up going crazy as well, lol, I've seen it. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use