Jump to content

British Police Misdemeanours (Sarah Everard case onwards)


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

They're defo complicit in her death ..not sure about abuse though?

 

 

They're pedos, even when talking about her they can't hide it. In their book they write how when she went missing they thought about  "her perfect little genitals torn apart"   those are the actual words they used to describe their daughter! 

Which parents talks about their child like that? 

Also the town they went on holiday isn't even an tourist attraction, in fact the town is home to Sigmund Freuds son or grandson, who is a pedophile. They even went around his house while on holiday and they were drinking and making jokes about Madelines mother being a s3x addict. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

My concern is on the wider discussion.

I know that majority of the perpertrators of violence on women are men but now there is requests for curfews on men and even requested for undercover police officers in nightclubs. 

To make this happen women have to put their trust in men, but we are led to believe that is that men are trustworthy. 

I sometimes when walking notice if there is a woman about 10 to 15 yards in front of me they look behind and are quite nervous. So I keep my distance or walk across the street. 

I think sometimes as men we never realise how we can be physically intimidating for a woman.

It is like having a 8 foot grizzly bear walking behind us. We would also feel intimidated. 

But if they implement some of these laws, all that would happen is segregation between the sexes. 

For all the women that have genuine concerns, there will be other women who will exploit these laws. 

What could happen is that a man will have to be accompanied by his sister, daughter, wife or some female relative so that if another female accuses you of something, it will be your female relative that will back you up after all we must believe women. 

It's going to come to women to call out other women's bullsh1t.

I made another thread 'Night culture' which was partially prompted by this news. 

Maybe the important point/issue here, is 'why are people out at night' (socialising) ?

It should not be a norm in society, but it is. 

 

I agree with you that as males, we are already 'demonised' and cannot expect people to believe us before a woman if there's a story with two sides.

Do men now need to wear bodycams when they go out ?

Why not just have female police officers to patrol these areas/events if these women are so worried ?

 

Is there any chance the charged man is innocent and has been framed ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, puzzled said:

They're pedos, even when talking about her they can't hide it. In their book they write how when she went missing they thought about  "her perfect little genitals torn apart"   those are the actual words they used to describe their daughter! 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh ya i do remember watching yt video of them exposing their creepiness..amazing how much green card these gora get way with and gov supports

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Maybe the important point/issue here, is 'why are people out at night' (socialising) ?

It should not be a norm in society, but it is. 

Depends on the context.

If you have been on the continent such as the South European countries, it is common to socialise at night as everyone is out including whole families. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

Oh ya i do remember watching yt video of them exposing their creepiness..amazing how much green card these gora get way with and gov supports

 

Well they set up the find Madeline fund in their daughters name and they used the money to pay their mortgage off ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to British Police Misdemeanours (Sarah Everard case onwards)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use