Sikh views parallel to envisioned pantheistic God of Baruch Spinoza??

[GurjantGnostic]

@M4A6 Go ahead and start here friend. Just read the Guru Granth Sahib Ji first then Bhai Gurdas Vaaran and I'll totally take your questions from there. 

https://www.searchgurbani.com/

 

[GurjantGnostic]

4 hours ago, M4A6 said:

Its an entire philosipher with thousands of pages of writing you want me to copy paste a wikapedia article here? Im not asking a quick question and if you dont know about him and are not willing to learn you should not answer based of a quick few sentences i would have wrote.

 

Plural gods as in several different concepts of 1 Onkar.

Third, no The gurus mind is not 'great' they does not possess things such as a humand mind. No comparison can be made dont be silly.

Fourth this point has no correlation to anything. Ok i understand, but it answers no question and envokes no discussion.

Fith - This is a difficult point to discuss but i guess so - einstein did not believe in theories such as many worlds interpretation or parralel universes, except mirror universes. But Many Worlds Theory was largely compiled after his death so his opinions on this would be difficult to guess. He did call the universe an expression of God though.

Why must he be silly? I didnt see you writing papers from general relativity to special relativity (which he didnt actually get nobel prizes in, he was awarded a nobel prize for photoelectric effect however because relativity was so contriversial) the man was a special mind. You can not deny it.

 

I am extremely dissapointed with the overall comments from this forum i must say i expected much much more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism

Start over Jio. 

 

[Premi5]

12 hours ago, M4A6 said:

Its an entire philosipher with thousands of pages of writing you want me to copy paste a wikapedia article here? Im not asking a quick question and if you dont know about him and are not willing to learn you should not answer based of a quick few sentences i would have wrote.

That's why a few lines or paragraph summary would have helped. Yes, even partly copying and referencing wiki page would have been useful 

Not a matter of being willing to learn, but if you don't provide any basic info then what are you expecting ?

[M4A6]

On 3/25/2021 at 9:42 AM, Premi5 said:

That's why a few lines or paragraph summary would have helped. Yes, even partly copying and referencing wiki page would have been useful 

Not a matter of being willing to learn, but if you don't provide any basic info then what are you expecting ?

its not a basic matter. Im expecting people who dont understand the subject matter to stay out of this discussion. GIving a small paragraph summary would only increase the likelyhood of low quality conversation from people commenting who know nothing more than that paragraph.

 

On 3/25/2021 at 12:33 AM, GurjantGnostic said:

Bro. 

You need to google words like Granth and start over. 

We like our guests saltier and less informed. Sorry. 

Good luck. Lol. 

Dont understand what you just said sorry. Please elaborate.

[GurjantGnostic]

4 hours ago, M4A6 said:

Im expecting people who dont understand the subject matter to stay out of this discussion

I'm expecting you to kick rocks. 

[S1ngh]

.

[HirdeyRahi]

Spnoza approached mysticism through the clear path of logic. If you read the Mool Mantar (basic premise) in Sri Guru Granth Sahib, it co-relates closely with the concept of God Nature put forth by Spinoza. One, True, Prime Cause, Non-interfering, Non-moved, Eternal, viewing himself through himself, self-born, having infinite attributes of which we can comprehend a few (two). Further, even the concept of transmigration of the understanding arrived by mind, oneness of all creatures, --- so many similarities, had his writings been known they would have been incorporated in the SGGS (imho only) or maybe his writings should be read as prelude to SGGS.