Jump to content

LGBTQ 'Anand Karaj'


Kau89r8
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have no problem with homosexual peeps EXCEPT them insisting that it is their Godgiven right as a human to produce biological children . No one has a right to procreate even heteros fail to do so . These folks are actually meant to be end of their line just as senor Darwin indicates in his survival of the fittest doctrine  (not continuing a manmade frankenstein child ) even hetero people will be told if they should give up if the donor route is not possible, besides there are many babies born in the world without a family , they would be a better sewa to uptake .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/23/2021 at 3:29 AM, Redoptics said:

Problem is they have sex for lust for the feelings associated with sex because there is nothing produced when homosexuals have sex, cant see them being celibate.

Yeah bro..but..like... don't we too?

Most children are oopsies. And even if a child is wanted it's not like we're like...mann...no way...okay...just for procreations sake...not going to enjoy this at all... it's my duty!

Kaam is Kaam. If it's not Anand Karaj it's all the same. 

Trying to make it Anand Karaj is the problem. 

Marriage and dating and swinging and all that are wide open to all Manmukhs. 

Anand Karaj is for Singh and Singhni. 

Not to redoptics but everybody:

All you single Singhs need to Anand Karaj already. 

Anand Karaj immediately.

Or. Voluntarily and happily wait while forging yourself as a Gursikh and conquering Kaam. Be just as happy single as Joined. 

The anger regarding sex...

Handle it the right way. Which is Naam and Anand Karaj or Naam and Naam. 

We aren't incels. Don't be frustrated. If its that bad... you're better off...

So let's stop the nonsense and get to Joining.

Incel rage and sexual repression is unhealthy. 

Volcel bliss and sexual success is healthy Gursikh chastity. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Yeah bro..but..like... don't we too?

Most children are oopsies. And even if a child is wanted it's not like we're like...mann...no way...okay...just for procreations sake...not going to enjoy this at all... it's my duty!

Kaam is Kaam. If it's not Anand Karaj it's all the same. 

Trying to make it Anand Karaj is the problem. 

Marriage and dating and swinging and all that are wide open to all Manmukhs. 

Anand Karaj is for Singh and Singhni. 

All you single Singhs need to Anand Karaj already. 

Brov real adults plan for a baby, they are not oopsies, well tell me why Anaand Karaj is not allowed huh, with your way of thinking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Redoptics said:

Brov real adults plan for a baby, they are not oopsies, well tell me why Anaand Karaj is not allowed huh, with your way of thinking?

Rare adults plan for a baby... Seen idiocracy?

I think we use breeding as a justification for hetero kaam over homo kaam, is half of what I'm saying, when really we're just kaami and not as interested in Anand Karaj as guiltless Kaam.

Meaning a lot of heteros are hypocrites which is fine. 

Why is Anand Karaj between men and women only?

1. Guru Ji's Hukam. 

2. In Satyug..or in Truth... we're all akaam surrounded by brothers and sisters. Before anyone was even sexually attractive Anand Karaj had to be done to turn you on for the first time? Only in a world driven mad with lust does this not make sense to us. 

3. It's a union between The Man and both female types spiritually?

Homosexual marriage and interfaith marriage are the same bro. Anand Karaj is Anand Karaj. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Rare adults plan for a baby... Seen idiocracy?

I think we use breeding as a justification for hetero kaam over homo kaam, is half of what I'm saying, when really we're just kaami and not as interested in Anand Karaj as guiltless Kaam.

Meaning a lot of heteros are hypocrites which is fine. 

Why is Anand Karaj between men and women only?

1. Guru Ji's Hukam. 

2. In Satyug..or in Truth... we're all akaam surrounded by brothers and sisters. Before anyone was even sexually attractive Anand Karaj had to be done to turn you on for the first time? Only in a world driven mad with lust does this not make sense to us. 

3. It's a union between The Man and both female types spiritually?

Homosexual marriage and interfaith marriage are the same bro. Anand Karaj is Anand Karaj. 

 

 

But we are all females and Waheguru is the male, see how you can twist things? 

Look homosexual marriage or relationships , I don't agree with, so I'll leave it as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use