Jump to content

Baba Sri Chand ji wearing a chola!


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

They are leaving the parkash of Guru Granth Sahib slowly in their deras too.

 

Even since my younger years, I didnt think of udasis much 

I just knew they were excommunicated and that baba Sri chand was egotistic and anti sikh at first back when I was little but looks like they weren't like that 

They are right now the most diluted sampardayi right now, I don't even have hope for them unlike the nirmalas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/6/2021 at 12:32 PM, puzzled said:

 Yeah that's the one. I've seen it in peoples houses in india, I used to think it was Baba Balak Nath, but then I found out its to do with Guru Nanak Dev jis sons.

Do Sikhs believe in that sakhi ?  or is it sects that follow Baba Shri Chand ji ?

I wonder if the animals in the painting are of importance? reminds of of Pir Bhudan shah 

 

Thanks. 

My nanimaa told me about this saki when I was young

So I guess mainstream sikhs believe in it (although mainstream sikhs belie bc e in a lot of stuff lol) 

Personally, I am a bit apprehensive of the sikhi, even if it were true it doesnt pose much importance to gurmat or sikhi in general in my neech opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

ust knew they were excommunicated and that baba Sri chand was egotistic and anti sikh at first back when I was little but looks like they weren't like that 

Baba Sri Chand ji just made 1 mistake in his life. We Sikhs make hundreds of mistakes.

He became a brahmgyani gursikh.He did parchar of gurmat only and his 4 compositions prove he was a true sikh.

Udasis were a good samparda and their deterioration or hinduization started from around 1820's.

There is no hukamname of Guru Sahib or no rehitnama of 18th century which forbids sikhs to associate with udasis.

We hv hukamname and rehitmamas which forbid us to associate with meenaas, ram raiye, dhir malliye and masands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Baba Sri Chand ji just made 1 mistake in his life. We Sikhs make hundreds of mistakes.

He became a brahmgyani gursikh.He did parchar of gurmat only and his 4 compositions prove he was a true sikh.

Udasis were a good samparda and their deterioration or hinduization started from around 1820's.

There is no hukamname of Guru Sahib or no rehitnama of 18th century which forbids sikhs to associate with udasis.

We hv hukamname and rehitmamas which forbid us to associate with meenaas, ram raiye, dhir malliye and masands.

Yeah I'm saying that was when I was young

I think baba ji reconciled with rest of panth during gurgaddi of guru raam das ji maharaj when he realized why 

These four were inheritors of gurgaddi as he witnessed guru raam das jis humility 

He was given 700 rupees as bhentaa by guru sahib when he got to amritsar (I think it was amritsar guru ki nagari) and they had a discourse 

Baba ji knew guru raam das ji possessed immense brahm gian but wanted to test them, so he asked why he kept such a long beard to which guru sahib replied to dust off babaji feet and as he was about to receive his feet, babaji picked him up and embraced guru sahib (maybe in tears if I remember correctly) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

Yeah I'm saying that was when I was young

I think baba ji reconciled with rest of panth during gurgaddi of guru raam das ji maharaj when he realized why 

These four were inheritors of gurgaddi as he witnessed guru raam das jis humility 

He was given 700 rupees as bhentaa by guru sahib when he got to amritsar (I think it was amritsar guru ki nagari) and they had a discourse 

Baba ji knew guru raam das ji possessed immense brahm gian but wanted to test them, so he asked why he kept such a long beard to which guru sahib replied to dust off babaji feet and as he was about to receive his feet, babaji picked him up and embraced guru sahib (maybe in tears if I remember correctly) 

Guru Amar daas ji gave His son Mohan to baba Sri chand ji too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Guru Amar daas ji gave His son Mohan to baba Sri chand ji too.

It was guru hargobind sahib ji who gave bhai gurditta ji I think

I'm pretty sure baba Sri chand did not continue relations with 2nd or 3rd paatshahis unless I'm mistaken 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, intrigued said:

Yea that's what I've learned as well

yeeah and baba mohan is more infamous for the "baba mohan valian pothian" (sometimes called goindvaal wali pothi") sakhi where he refused to give up the historic pothi during sewa of adi granth prakash was going on under agvaahi of guru arjan dev sahib paatshah 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use