Jump to content

Muslim Lesbian writes about Sikh Film


Recommended Posts

Guest DesiFlix

A feminist film company called Dispatch FMI put on a screening of Bend It Like Beckham in London this week. They comissioned an essay to go with the screening and put a call out for proposals a few weeks ago on their twitter page. I was excited to see some positive representation in the media.

But they chose Deena al-Aqsa, a Muslim Lesbian, to write the essay. That's how she describes herself in her Twitter bio - that's not me making an assumption and stereotyping her because of her name.

Sikhs get so little coverage compared to muslims and we spend so much of our time explaining that we aren't muslims. There is virtually no Sikh representation in the medea It seems like the company is just reinforcing that. It's like all brown people are the same. I don't know if they got any proposals from Sikhs, but they should have made the effort to hire someone with the same ethnicity as the protagonist of the film.

You might say Bend it Like Beckham isn't a Sikh film, and you would be right. But it presented Sikhi in a positive light to billions of film watchers around the world. It was a mainstream phenomenon. No film in the English Language has managed that since.

I'm going to complain to Dispatch FMI and I would urge you to do the same.

Here's the essay. The company's contact details are at the bottom of the page with links to their twitter pages if you want to complain. https://www.dispatchfmi.com/single-post/bend-it-like-beckham-could-have-been-queerer-but-it-still-aged-well

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest guest

sorry but i hated this cr*p and that coconut suckup Gurinder Chadha.  its typical cr*p about 'oppression' and how life would be so great if we only acted like goreh.  this <banned word filter activated> didn't do sikhs any favours.  i think only sikhs with low self-esteem were impressed/felt good about this.

i would not recommend any ethic group to allow mass media spotlight on them.  i believe it won't do them any favours, on the contrary it may harm their culture.  better to spend your time/effort being a good/strong/honest person then worry about misrepresentation.  

as for the screening- its a feminist group.  they don't care about religion etc they care that its about a female lead.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/25/2021 at 11:52 PM, Guest guest said:

 

i would not recommend any ethic group to allow mass media spotlight on them.  i believe it won't do them any favours, on the contrary it may harm their culture.  better to spend your time/effort being a good/strong/honest person then worry about misrepresentation.  

as for the screening- its a feminist group.  they don't care about religion etc they care that its about a female lead.

They do care about both religion and gender. Hence why they are trying to destroy both. Most female leads in the media are actually Transgender. This has been going on at least since WWII if not longer. Most of my favourite actors/actresses are Trans.

So best to stay clear of all of them. They are used by their handlers in very evil crimes such as drug and human trafficking. Hence the reason that H/Bollywood is being destroyed. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GuessGuest
On 6/27/2021 at 1:44 AM, Suchi said:

They do care about both religion and gender. Hence why they are trying to destroy both. Most female leads in the media are actually Transgender. This has been going on at least since WWII if not longer. Most of my favourite actors/actresses are Trans.

So best to stay clear of all of them. They are used by their handlers in very evil crimes such as drug and human trafficking. Hence the reason that H/Bollywood is being destroyed. 

Who are your favourite stars and where are the sources that show they are trans? Do you have any sources which say they are involved in drug and human trafficing?

Seriously, I wonder what sum people in this forum smoke this days. It aint thoof that's for sure.

On 6/25/2021 at 11:52 PM, Guest guest said:

sorry but i hated this cr*p and that coconut suckup Gurinder Chadha.  its typical cr*p about 'oppression' and how life would be so great if we only acted like goreh.  this <banned word filter activated> didn't do sikhs any favours.  i think only sikhs with low self-esteem were impressed/felt good about this.

i would not recommend any ethic group to allow mass media spotlight on them.  i believe it won't do them any favours, on the contrary it may harm their culture.  better to spend your time/effort being a good/strong/honest person then worry about misrepresentation.  

as for the screening- its a feminist group.  they don't care about religion etc they care that its about a female lead.

Its not about oppression or acticing white. It's about getting any representation that is remotely positive. There are somany people who either don't know about Sikhs or think we are fanatical sword weilding terrroists. Its also about giving opportunities which are about Sikh things to Sikh people. Just imagine the uproar if it was the other way around - if a Sikh person wrote about a Muslim film in a positive light.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/29/2021 at 7:45 PM, Guest GuessGuest said:

Who are your favourite stars and where are the sources that show they are trans? Do you have any sources which say they are involved in drug and human trafficing?

You need to wake up fast. 

Most Bollywood actors are involved in both human and drug trafficking and affiliated to ISI/Pakistan and China. Hence reason why those promoting Chinese products were boycotted. This was revealed following Sushant Singh Rajput's murder which exposed this nexus. Bollywood was created by Hollywood- if you watch the old films they are highly influenced by Western culture. Khans are promoted as part of the Islamisation agenda. 

As far as Trans are concerned there are some bloggers that have been exposing this for a while. It's linked into Christianity and the church thats controlled by the Vatican. One reason being their wish to preserve the male soprano voices by castrating them. 

Here are a few links to start you off:

 

http://www.frot.co.nz/design/funny/the-full-tranny-suspect-list/

https://www.albawaba.com/node/child-sex-trafficking-hollywood-actor-goes-online-revealing-shocking-allegations-1374161

https://therealtruthnetworkcom.wordpress.com/2020/06/26/human-trafficking/

https://www.khaleejtimes.com/citytimes/bollywood/exclusive-india-cracks-down-on-drugs-after-bollywood-scandal

https://www.opindia.com/2020/09/bollywood-drug-probe-terrorism-trafficking-funding/

https://www.ernestdempsey.com/bollywood-actors-murder-drug-and-child-sex-trafficking-in-bollywood/

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/29/2021 at 7:45 PM, Guest GuessGuest said:

Who are your favourite stars and where are the sources that show they are trans? Do you have any sources which say they are involved in drug and human trafficing?

Seriously, I wonder what sum people in this forum smoke this days. It aint thoof that's for sure.

Its not about oppression or acticing white. It's about getting any representation that is remotely positive. There are somany people who either don't know about Sikhs or think we are fanatical sword weilding terrroists. Its also about giving opportunities which are about Sikh things to Sikh people. Just imagine the uproar if it was the other way around - if a Sikh person wrote about a Muslim film in a positive light.

Heres a link to rituals involving those at the top. 

Linking Bollywood to the CIA MKUktra program.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest
On 6/29/2021 at 7:45 PM, Guest GuessGuest said:

 

Seriously, I wonder what sum people in this forum smoke this days. It aint thoof that's for sure.

Just imagine the uproar if it was the other way around - if a Sikh person wrote about a Muslim film in a positive light.

lol me too, some of the replies here are so weird.  which actors are trans?  lol.

there wouldn't be any uproar about the latter point.  it probably happens all the time.  older gen. love to go 'wah wah' over urdu stuff and younger gen- half of them secretly want to be muslim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Display name
On 7/2/2021 at 3:39 PM, Guest guest said:

 

there wouldn't be any uproar about the latter point.  it probably happens all the time.  older gen. love to go 'wah wah' over urdu stuff and younger gen- half of them secretly want to be muslim.

There would probably be uproar from the muslims. They wouldnt be able to cope with a Sikh writing about mulim issues. If the younger generation want to be muslim, its only cos of the opportunities they get for being muslim lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9831797/Bradford-child-abuse-report-reveals-victim-raped-forced-Islamic-marriage.html?ito=amp_twitter_share-top Social worker 'attended wedding of terrified girl, 15, to her abuser': Carers turned a blind eye when teenage grooming victim was forced into Islamic marriage, damning report reveals Independent review on child sexual exploitation was published on Tuesday The review was commissioned in the wake of the sentencing of nine men in 2019 It found social workers in Bradford had turned a blind eye to grooming victim  By JAMES TOZER FOR DAILY MAIL PUBLISHED: 19:47, 27 July 2021 | UPDATED: 01:39, 28 July 2021                       e-mail     8kshares 1.2k View comments   Social workers in Bradford turned a blind eye when a 15-year-old grooming victim took part in an Islamic marriage to one of her abusers, a damning report revealed yesterday. Despite the teenager not coming from a Muslim background, professionals meant to protect her then allowed the parents of her 'husband' to foster her after she became pregnant, it revealed. One of her social workers allegedly even attended the wedding ceremony. The terrified girl – referred to as 'Anna' – was left in a state of 'domestic slavery', too scared to leave the controlling relationship for fear she would be the victim of an honour killing, she told the report's authors. Details emerged yesterday in an independent report into the treatment of five abuse victims in the West Yorkshire city over the past two decades, which found that 'children suffered abuse no child should have to experience'.  Alarmingly, it concluded that some youngsters in Bradford 'remain unprotected' from sex exploitation.   +2   Social workers in Bradford turned a blind eye when a 15-year-old grooming victim took part in an Islamic marriage to one of her abusers, the damning report revealed yesterday (stock image) The report – described by the body which commissioned it as making 'difficult and, at times, distressing reading' – began two years ago after nine men of Pakistani heritage were jailed for more than 57 years over the sexual exploitation of girls who had been in Bradford Council's care. Anna was placed in residential care as a teenager in 2002 but went missing more than 70 times, according to the report. She disclosed details of sexual abuse – including rapes – to a confidential support service for girls involved in prostitution, but nothing was passed on to police or social workers. RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next Lumberjack, 24, doing his 'dream job' was crushed to death...Britain's biggest travel insurance provider stops offering... SHARE THIS ARTICLE Share The following year, aged 15, she told the project worker she had converted to Islam and married her older Asian 'boyfriend' in a Sharia law ceremony. The report said it appeared there had been 'collusion' with this by her social worker 'who allegedly attended the ceremony and assessed that her marriage was likely to reduce the risks incurred when Anna was missing'. Staggeringly, despite becoming pregnant, after a review Anna was formally placed with her abuser's parents as a foster child, with the family even paid a fostering allowance.   +2   The report began two years ago after nine men were jailed for more than 57 years over the sexual exploitation of girls who had been in Bradford Council's care. Pictured: Basharat Khaliq, Saeed Akhtar, Naveed Akhtar, Parvaze Ahmed, Zeeshan Ali, Fahim Iqbal, Izar Hussain, Mohammed Usman and Kieran Harris who were all jailed at Bradford Crown Court in 2019 Anna told the report's author: 'At 14 years old I was engaged to be married, taking on the role of an Islamic wife fulfilling the needs of my husband and the extended family somewhat like a maid. 'We had no similarities in race, religion or culture and I continued to be subject to domestic violence and was subject to a coercive, controlling sexual relationship with a known perpetrator. I was frightened to leave, in fear of an honour-based killing.' The report concluded: 'It is hard to understand how this decision can have been made and it resulted in Anna being entirely reliant on her abuser and his family.' Instead of protecting her from harm, the placement left her 'at greater risk and made her entirely dependent on them', it added. While there, she was subjected to 'domestic slavery' and 'sexually abused and exploited by dozens of adult males', it went on. The Bradford Partnership – which includes Bradford Council children's services and Bradford Police – has since apologised to young abuse victims who had been failed. It said a large number of defendants have been found guilty and given substantial prison sentences. The joint statement said: 'We believe that practice across all agencies is improving... but there is much more to do.'  
    • I don't think narcissism is on their increase per se  I think that narcissism was always there in people and all that has happened is the narcissism is now out in the open. It has been amplified.  Similar to how people who become rich become arrogant and obnoxious. Money did not change them, it just exposed them to show they really are.  We had social controls in society that shunned narcissist aspects so that it got buried. With social controls now being untangled it is no longer taboo and with social media (instagram and tiktok ) it has upscaled attention seeking and the narcissism. But with a overload of narcissism and attention seeking in society, I think what could happen is: 1. We could see narcissist insensitivity in that we will see people less bothered with the attention seeking 2. A backlash and swing in the pendulum 
    • there has been vaaran /caste since early days of manusmitri and every Brahmin has used it to make themselves useful to invaders as they sold their skills as master manipulators of society else how could handfuls of people control multi millions ?They did it during the islamic invaders reign and then switched when the angrez/portuguese arrived . Guru Sahiban removed the leprosy of vaaran from our consciouness but with the interference of Angrez and their flying monkeys the brahmins they inserted dubious texts into our literature which allowed the poisonous mentality back
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use