Jump to content

5 types of Sikhi in Sau Sakhi


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Lots of people from both AKJ and Damdami Taksal seem to give full Khand-Di-Pahul to babies.

In catholicism they have baptism and confirmation. Baptism is often done to children well before they are old enough to realize. It's usually redone when old enough to understand, and all sins are forgiven then. And then once older they get confirmed. 

However if we look at the original baptists and then Jesus, they were baptising adults who were fully capable of making a new commitment, living up to it, and actually had sins to be forgiven. 

But still catholics and christians baptise babies because they want them protected and claimed for christendom. 

Really they should have other prayers of protection they offer and allow only young adults or better to be baptised. 

I doubt Amrit was offered this young in Purtan Gursikhi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GurjantGnostic said:

I doubt Amrit was offered this young in Purtan Gursikhi. 

The difference between Christian baptism and Amrit Sanchar is that they only believe in this life, so at least on some stance it kinda makes sense why they’d baptism kids. But in Gurmat we have reincarnation, and by Karams we are given certain lives, but ultimately have to decide for ourselves. 
 

A lot of high quality Gursikhs did take Khand-Di-Pahul as infants though, like Surrinder Singh Sodhi, but it shouldn’t be mainstream. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

The difference between Christian baptism and Amrit Sanchar is that they only believe in this life, so at least on some stance it kinda makes sense why they’d baptism kids. But in Gurmat we have reincarnation, and by Karams we are given certain lives, but ultimately have to decide for ourselves. 
 

A lot of high quality Gursikhs did take Khand-Di-Pahul as infants though, like Surrinder Singh Sodhi, but it shouldn’t be mainstream. 

Good point. 

And. 

I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 11/14/2021 at 1:21 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

The difference between Christian baptism and Amrit Sanchar is that they only believe in this life, so at least on some stance it kinda makes sense why they’d baptism kids. But in Gurmat we have reincarnation, and by Karams we are given certain lives, but ultimately have to decide for ourselves. 
 

A lot of high quality Gursikhs did take Khand-Di-Pahul as infants though, like Surrinder Singh Sodhi, but it shouldn’t be mainstream. 

 

On 11/14/2021 at 1:27 AM, GurjantGnostic said:

Good point. 

And. 

I agree. 

I disagree. 
most who take Amrit is usually in adolescence onwards. 
 

I doubt most Baptised Christians follow ‘the life’. 
 

Amrit is also a much bigger commitment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Premi5 said:

 

I disagree. 
most who take Amrit is usually in adolescence onwards. 
 

I doubt most Baptised Christians follow ‘the life’. 
 

Amrit is also a much bigger commitment 

Just to clarify, the part I agree with is that it's usually best to wait until old enough to understand what you're commiting to.

That's the part you disagree with?

Almost zero christians follow the life as you put it. 

Amrit is a way bigger commitment. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use