Jump to content

Pics of jaats getting into sikhi!


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'll leave this image here. Punjab has the highest percentage of Dalits at 32% than any other state and yet percentage wise has the least number of crimes than other states. So who is right, me or you? 

While I present the facts you present your BS picked up from SM to buttress your inherent hatred of Jats. 

 

File:2012 Crime rate against Scheduled Castes per 100000 in India by States  and Union Territories.svg - Wikimedia Commons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More up to date data from 2019. Look at Haryana, a lower overall population, less Dalits than Punjab and nearly 6 times as many crimes against Dalits. Either the Jats in Punjab are unique in suppressing all their crimes against Dalits or Punjab for Dalits is not the hell hole you claim it is.

 

Nine states have 54% of Dalits, see 84% of crime against SCs | India News -  Times of India

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, proactive said:

I'll leave this image here. Punjab has the highest percentage of Dalits at 32% than any other state and yet percentage wise has the least number of crimes than other states. So who is right, me or you? 

While I present the facts you present your BS picked up from SM to buttress your inherent hatred of Jats. 

 

File:2012 Crime rate against Scheduled Castes per 100000 in India by States  and Union Territories.svg - Wikimedia Commons

That's because juts are leaving the cesspit they've created in Panjab in droves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2021 at 12:32 AM, proactive said:

Sorry I rattled your cage. Your knowledge of Punjab comes from those freshies you worked on the building sites with as well as social media. Prove me wrong, tell me you have actually been to Punjab. 

As for being the second biggest group in the Panth, you are sadly mistaken. Below from 1931 census. 

a1z0ow44nai61.png

 

Not possible. Punjab has 57% Sikh based on 2011 census. 62.5% means  35% Jatt Sikh population in Punjab but most estimate it is around 21-25% on the other hand out of 32% Dalits 60% are Sikhs that means 19.2% Sikhs are Dalits. This putt dalit and Jatt Sikh ratio very close

https://scroll.in/article/959164/in-this-punjab-village-sikhs-are-shedding-their-caste-biases-during-the-covid-19-crisis

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kds1980 said:

Not possible. Punjab has 57% Sikh based on 2011 census. 62.5% means  35% Jatt Sikh population in Punjab but most estimate it is around 21-25% on the other hand out of 32% Dalits 60% are Sikhs that means 19.2% Sikhs are Dalits. This putt dalit and Jatt Sikh ratio very close

https://scroll.in/article/959164/in-this-punjab-village-sikhs-are-shedding-their-caste-biases-during-the-covid-19-crisis

 

The figures are for the 1931 census when the mass of Sikhs lived in Punjab. There have been changes since 1931 but I would estimate Jats are still over 50% of all Sikhs. Your calculations are incorrect.

Sikhs were 57% of Punjab population so 16 million out of 27.7 million. Dalits were 32% of the total population of Punjab of which Sikhs Dalits were 5.3 million out of 8.86 million total Dalits. This makes Sikh Dalits 33.7% of all Sikhs in Punjab. This then leaves 66% of non-Dalit Sikhs.  The settlement of Sikhs in 1947 was very disjointed, with the vast majority of Jats being resettled in Punjab and Haryana, while some castes like Khatri and Arora settled in the large cities such as Delhi, Kanpur etc. A large majority of Khatris and Aroras settled outside of Punjab. 

Of the non-Dalit Sikhs at least 75% must be Jats. Rajput, Saini, Kamboh, Lobana, Tarkhan and Brahmin Sikhs were always low. These castes along with Chimbhas, Julahas, etc were 445,000 in number in 1931. If we just take increase in the number of Sikhs from 1931 to 2011 in India, then Sikhs increased from 4.3 million to 20.8 million which is an increase of 4.8 times. If the non-Dalit, non-Jats Sikhs also increased by that number then they would be that would make them 2.1 million in 2011. As I wrote before the mass of Khatris and Aroras do not live in Punjab. So if we take half their number out from the 1931 numbers 80,000 out o 163,000, then the non-Jat, non Dalit Sikhs in 1931 were 365,000 times that by 4.8 times increase between 1931 and 2011 then the non-Dalit, non-Jat Sikhs in Punjab in 2011 would be 1.75 million. Take that away from the 10.6 million non-Dalit Sikhs and that leave 8.8 million Jat Sikhs in Punjab in 2011. This makes them about 32% of the total population of Punjab and 55% of the Sikh population. 

So your figures for 21-25% are incorrect and these figures have been used by BJP and other anti-Sikh forces to imply that Jat Sikh domination of Punjab politics is illegitimate. The fact that politics in India is dominated by Brahmins who are less than 5% of the population is totally lost on them. Unfortunately we also have our own useful i.diots like DailySingh who wants to take out his own insecurities against the Jats and plays the same game as the BJP. 

The politics of Punjab is not just dominated by Jats but by agricultural castes which makes sense as Punjab is an agricultural state. The non-Jat agricultural cases such as Rajput, Saini, Kamboh, Lobana and Gujjar though small in number have their political interests aligned with the Jats as well. These four castes add another 3 to 4% to the Jat Sikh numbers so Punjab politics is dominated by 35-36% of the population. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2021 at 10:06 PM, dallysingh101 said:
Caste Population data of Punjab
Constitutional categories Population (%) Castes
Other Backward Classes (OBC) 31.3%[5] includes Sainis [6] and Sikh Rajput,[7] (Sainis and sikh rajputs added to OBC list in 2016[8]), Sunar, Kamboj, Labana, Tarkhan/Ramgarhia, Kumhar/Prajapati, Arain, Gurjar, Teli, Banjara, Lohar, Bhat,[9] Others
Scheduled Castes (Dalits) 31.9%[10] includes Mazhabi Sikh - 10%, Ramdasia Sikh/Ravidassia (Chamar)/Ad-Dharmi - 13.1%, Balmiki/Bhanghi - 3.5%, Bazigar - 1.05%, Others - 4%[11]
Others 33% includes Jat Sikh - 19%,[12] Dvija castes (Brahmin, hindu Rajput, Bania, Khatri-Arora-Sood[13]) - 14%
religious minorities 3.8%[14] includes Muslims, Christians, Buddhists, Jains

 

This might be more accurate.

@proactive

This breakdown shows Jats at 19%, not 33% as you claim. The rest are broken down as 

Schedule castes at 31.9% including Hindus

OBC castes at 31.3% including Hindus 

High caste Hindus at 14%

Remaining at 3.8%

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Proactive 

What it seems to suggest is that if Jats in Punjab lead the way then the rest will follow. 

If the Jaats in Western UP, Haryana and Rajastan become Sikh en masses and those follow the same patterns as Punjab then the non-Jaats of those states would follow. 

Wonder what the no.s of Jaats are in those states because the numbers are far greater than the ones in Punjab.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use