Jump to content

Pics of jaats getting into sikhi!


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Proactive 

What it seems to suggest is that if Jats in Punjab lead the way then the rest will follow. 

If the Jaats in Western UP, Haryana and Rajastan become Sikh en masses and those follow the same patterns as Punjab then the non-Jaats of those states would follow. 

Wonder what the no.s of Jaats are in those states because the numbers are far greater than the ones in Punjab.

 

At least it might keep the conversions to christianity in check? 

But I think it might lead to factionalism too, it's not going to be long before Panjabi juts are going to start eying up any funds coming through new Gurdwara networks in the new areas and conflict arising over this. 

And it's fiction put out by McLeod, that other Panjabis went into Sikhi because of juts. Many had long standing relationships with Sikhi all the way from the Guru period.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

At least it might keep the conversions to christianity in check? 

But I think it might lead to factionalism too, it's not going to be long before Panjabi juts are going to start eying up any funds coming through new Gurdwara networks in the new areas and conflict arising over this. 

And it's fiction put out by McLeod, that other Panjabis went into Sikhi because of juts. Many had long standing relationships with Sikhi all the way from the Guru period.  

Not really.

I don't see Punjabi Jats eyeing funds in Delhi or in Haryana/Himachal so it doesn't make sense for them to do this in other areas either. 

Nobody knows  who McLeod is let alone follow anything he says.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Proactive 

What it seems to suggest is that if Jats in Punjab lead the way then the rest will follow. 

If the Jaats in Western UP, Haryana and Rajastan become Sikh en masses and those follow the same patterns as Punjab then the non-Jaats of those states would follow. 

Wonder what the no.s of Jaats are in those states because the numbers are far greater than the ones in Punjab.

 

The situation in Haryana and Western UP is slightly different to Punjab, in Punjab the Jats were the main landholding caste in central and east Punjab. In south-east Punjab (ie Haryana) This status is shared by Gujjars, Ahirs and Rajputs. In the Jat belt of Haryana -Rohtak-Hissar-Sonepat, it is similar to Punjab but in other areas of Haryana these other landholding castes also have large populations. In Haryana, the Jats are estimated to be about 25% of the population and their solidarity has meant that they have pretty much ruled Haryana because the other landholding caste do not have the same solidarity and numbers combined as the Jats do. But Sikhi will become the majority religion of the rural areas of the Jat belt if we take advantage of the present circumstances. In the Jat villages especially the laagis will definitely follow them into Sikhi and Sikhs could become 30-40% of the population of Haryana. In Western UP the Jats are  less than the Jats in Haryana but in western UP the population is much larger and there are also Gujjars, Rajput, Yadavs and Ahirs who are landholders. Also the Muslim population is much larger than in Haryana.

Numbers wise if we take the Jat numbers from 1931 - in UP there were 848,000 Jats including about 50,000 Pachhada Sikh Jats who trace their origin to the times of Banda Singh Bahadur and who speak a mixture of Punjabi and HIndi. In Rajasthan in 1931 there were 1 million Jats. So if they increased by the same rate as the rest of the population then there are 7 million in Rajasthan and 5 million in western UP and about 6.5 million in Haryana. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Not really.

I don't see Punjabi Jats eyeing funds in Delhi or in Haryana/Himachal so it doesn't make sense for them to do this in other areas either. 

Nobody knows  who McLeod is let alone follow anything he says.

 

 

Jats are pure evil according to him and are at the bottom of everything wrong in Punjab. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, proactive said:

The situation in Haryana and Western UP is slightly different to Punjab, in Punjab the Jats were the main landholding caste in central and east Punjab. In south-east Punjab (ie Haryana) This status is shared by Gujjars, Ahirs and Rajputs. In the Jat belt of Haryana -Rohtak-Hissar-Sonepat, it is similar to Punjab but in other areas of Haryana these other landholding castes also have large populations. In Haryana, the Jats are estimated to be about 25% of the population and their solidarity has meant that they have pretty much ruled Haryana because the other landholding caste do not have the same solidarity and numbers combined as the Jats do. But Sikhi will become the majority religion of the rural areas of the Jat belt if we take advantage of the present circumstances. In the Jat villages especially the laagis will definitely follow them into Sikhi and Sikhs could become 30-40% of the population of Haryana. In Western UP the Jats are  less than the Jats in Haryana but in western UP the population is much larger and there are also Gujjars, Rajput, Yadavs and Ahirs who are landholders. Also the Muslim population is much larger than in Haryana.

Numbers wise if we take the Jat numbers from 1931 - in UP there were 848,000 Jats including about 50,000 Pachhada Sikh Jats who trace their origin to the times of Banda Singh Bahadur and who speak a mixture of Punjabi and HIndi. In Rajasthan in 1931 there were 1 million Jats. So if they increased by the same rate as the rest of the population then there are 7 million in Rajasthan and 5 million in western UP and about 6.5 million in Haryana. 

 

There is a symbiotic relationship between the different groups. If one group goes the others follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

Not really.

I don't see Punjabi Jats eyeing funds in Delhi or in Haryana/Himachal so it doesn't make sense for them to do this in other areas either. 

Nobody knows  who McLeod is let alone follow anything he says.

 

 

I hope so. I really hope apnay get our act together now and start overcoming a lot of the petty crap that now defines us. 

I've always thought India itself should be a Sikh country. I think we've got conflicts coming our way one way or another. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, proactive said:

Jats are pure evil according to him and are at the bottom of everything wrong in Punjab. 

They are responsible for the current state of Panjab.  End of.

 

If you want to sit on the throne, you have to take responsibility for the state of the kingdom. 

What we are seeing are the results of this 'dominant' group's (as Ranjeet put it) decision making on Panjab. I meet and mix with these people all the time, they don't seem to have that higher thinking capacity to develop economies or culture, they just jump on whatever prototype someone else makes in droves, to supplement a constantly diminishing landholding in their family. Whether this was/is joining some army, immigrating abroad for low level work, crime. 

Same old story been going on for decades, if not a century now. They don't seem to have any grand vision. It says a lot that they haven't even set up trade schools out there despite this being the main source of desi jut employment in the UK at least.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use