Jump to content

muslim grooming gang canada girls 15 and 13 years 10 suspects


justasking
 Share

Recommended Posts

A sul is a sul. It doesn't matter if they are from Mirpur, Lahore, Kabul, Dhaka, Beirut or Damascus.

Here in the UK these grooming gangs have consisted of Pak Mirpuris, Pak Punjabis, Afghans and Bangladeshis.

There have been Lebanese grooming gangs in Australia and look at the number of sexual assaults in Germany carried out by 'refugees' from Syria etc.

Now what links Pakistanis, Afghans, Bangladeshis and Lebanese people ? It certainly isn't language and culture!

Do not become close to them. Be civil when you have to be, such as at work but do not befriend them.

This is what they are capable of:

https://www.sikh24.com/2012/10/10/wanted-for-murder-of-mother-and-three-children/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jai Tegang! said:

So it's not restricted to certain groups within their larger Paki community? What about the other sub-continental muslims in the UK?

No it isn't, and apnay who keep throwing it on mirpuris are usually clueless people. Other groups such as moroccans, algerians, afghans, albanians and many other eastern european people are involved in the flesh trade too.   

They have 'stables' of girls of different types (brown, white blonde, etc.) to cater for a wide range of preferences. I think the sullah grooming gangs turn brown girls and then they exchange girls (or sell them) to other (say) eastern european gangs for their 'stables'. 

Plus, people should know that it isn't just other sullay that use these services, plenty of goray do too, to fulfill some asian girl fetish. That's probably why many whites here don't like us highlighting these things too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Watch out for sullay panjabis pretending to be Sikh (wearing karas, using Sikh nick names). Some daft bird in a club wouldn't be able to tell the difference.  

They may also make friends with Sikh blokes (usually someone socially isolated or vulnerable or gullible) and use them to detract from what they are really like, and to get girls guards down.  

I'm not saying every last one will do this, but just be aware of the tactics. They'll have new ones too now as well.  They will form networks around the country and be able to disappear girls to the other side ofteh country .rapidly

And they're not slow. They'll study the whole environment (including culture) looking for weak points. Where there are girls and alcohol is likely to be targeted. Drinks can get spiked and compromising films/photos taken. Even schools can be targeted. 

They will play on 'similarities' like Panjabi culture, caste, language to infiltrate (Punjabiat). Apnay/apneean who have excessive trusting and friendly natures are also a route in.  

We need you to be at the forefront of raising awareness. 

I've noticed some Pakistani men are sly types, they seem okay on the surface but something seems off about them 

has this happened much in East London ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

A sul is a sul. It doesn't matter if they are from Mirpur, Lahore, Kabul, Dhaka, Beirut or Damascus.

Here in the UK these grooming gangs have consisted of Pak Mirpuris, Pak Punjabis, Afghans and Bangladeshis.

There have been Lebanese grooming gangs in Australia and look at the number of sexual assaults in Germany carried out by 'refugees' from Syria etc.

Now what links Pakistanis, Afghans, Bangladeshis and Lebanese people ? It certainly isn't language and culture!

Do not become close to them. Be civil when you have to be, such as at work but do not befriend them.

This is what they are capable of:

https://www.sikh24.com/2012/10/10/wanted-for-murder-of-mother-and-three-children/

 

1 hour ago, dallysingh101 said:

No it isn't, and apnay who keep throwing it on mirpuris are usually clueless people. Other groups such as moroccans, algerians, afghans, albanians and many other eastern european people are involved in the flesh trade too.   

They have 'stables' of girls of different types (brown, white blonde, etc.) to cater for a wide range of preferences. I think the sullah grooming gangs turn brown girls and then they exchange girls (or sell them) to other (say) eastern european gangs for their 'stables'. 

Plus, people should know that it isn't just other sullay that use these services, plenty of goray do too, to fulfill some asian girl fetish. That's probably why many whites here don't like us highlighting these things too. 

 

I wonder if France has problems with their Moroccans, Algerians, etc

I think Scandinavia and Holland have issues with Turks and Moroccans

 

Don't forget Somalians (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30078503?

Bristol sex gangs jailed for grooming girls

Published
27 November 2014
aptionBristol sex gangs jailed for grooming girls

Thirteen men have been convicted of a string of child sex crimes in Bristol involving the abuse, rape and prostitution of teenage girls.

Bristol Crown Court heard one victim, aged 16, was assaulted by five Somali men after she was moved to the city while in the care of another authority.

Her 14-year-old sister was raped by a member of the gang while visiting her.

The inquiry led to police uncovering another gang of Somali origin who had been abusing four other girls.

The four teenagers were paid £30 or given drugs, alcohol and gifts to perform sex acts on older men from the Somali community.

'Unforgivable acts'

The court heard some were persuaded to have sex with other gang members as they were told by the gang it was Somali "culture and tradition" and "men always have sex with each other's girlfriends".

One 13-year-old victim was raped four times by three different men in a Premier Inn in Bristol city centre.

A statement from the Bristol Somali community said: "The community is deeply shocked and shaken by the outcome of this case. They are unforgivable acts of cruelty against the most vulnerable members of our community."

Clockwise from top left: Mohamed Jumale, Said Zakaria, Sakariah Sheikh, Mohamed Dahir, Omar Jumale, Abdirashid Abdulahi and Jusef Abdirizak
image captionClockwise from top left: Mohamed Jumale, Said Zakaria, Sakariah Sheikh, Mohamed Dahir, Omar Jumale, Abdirashid Abdulahi and Jusef Abdirizak

The 13 men, all from Bristol, were convicted of charges including rape, sexual activity with a child, facilitating child prostitution, trafficking and paying for the sexual services of a child.

Six were jailed following a trial during the summer. The remaining seven were convicted on Wednesday.

Details of the two cases - which found grooming and abuse dating back to 2011 - can only now be revealed after reporting restrictions were lifted.

The first trial centred on a group of drug dealers from the Easton area and their exploitation of primarily one teenage girl.

She had been moved into a flat on her own in the city and left almost unsupervised by social workers from outside the area.

The second trial focused on another group of young men and their grooming and subsequent sexual abuse of girls.

Premier Inn CCTVIMAGE SOURCE,AVON AND SOMERSET POLICE
image captionSome of the abuse took place at a city centre Premier Inn hotel

Tried in July and sentenced for up to 13 years in jail:

  • Mustapha Farah, 21, Liban Abdi, 22, and Arafat Osman, 20, were each jailed for 13 years for paying for the sexual services of a child and supplying Class A drugs
  • Abdulahi Aden, 20, was jailed for 13 years for rape and supplying Class A drugs
  • Mustafa Deria, 22, was found guilty of rape and was jailed for seven-and-a-half years
  • Idleh Osman, 22, was jailed for 10 years for facilitating child prostitution and supplying Class A drugs

Tried in November and due to be sentenced on Friday:

  • Sakariah Sheik, 21, Abdirashid Abdulahi, 21, and Jusuf Abdirizak, 20, were found guilty of rape
  • Mohamed Dahir, 22, was found guilty of causing child prostitution
  • Omar Jumale, 20, was found guilty of having sex with a child
  • Said Zakaria, 22 was found guilty of rape and having sex with a child
  • Mohamed Jumale, 24, was found guilty of rape and sex with a child

Crying under a sink

Speaking in July, Judge Michael Roach said the gang took "considerable advantage" of the 16-year-old girl who had been moved to Bristol by a council, which cannot be named in order to protect her identity.

"I hope there will be an opportunity for the authorities to reconsider their thinking behind such a placement because it has, on any retrospective view, added considerably to the damage of that young person," he said.

The teenager had been ordered by a court to live outside her home area and was placed in "supported living accommodation".

Social workers had "very real concerns" about her and tried to persuade her to leave but "she refused to", the court heard.

The abused girl's five-month ordeal ended when police went to her flat looking for her sister who had been reported missing.

The 14-year-old sibling was found crying in a cupboard under the kitchen sink in just her underwear.

"One of the women police officers went to speak to her and she said that one of the men had forced himself on her, he had raped her," prosecutor Anna Vigars said in court.

An independent serious case review into her care is now being carried out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-news/snivelling-huddersfield-grooming-gang-rapist-21350300

Snivelling Huddersfield grooming gang rapist who treated girl 'like rag doll' moans 'I'm a broken man'

Zahid Hassan, Saqib Raheel and Sholan James were all sentenced for subjecting their teenage victims to "humiliation and degradation" as they were raped and sexually assaulted

 
  • SHARE
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 
By
Guy Bell
  • 13:50, 19 AUG 2021
Three members of a grooming gang who plied their teenage victims with alcohol before humiliating and degrading them with rapes and other sex attacks have been jailed.

Zahid Hassan, Saqib Raheel and Sholan James were convicted after a nine-day trial at Leeds Crown Court in May following more than eight hours of jury deliberations.

Jurors heard an 18-year-old girl was raped by Hassan and his friend 'Fred' in 2006. A few years later, a 15-year-old girl was sexually abused by Raheel, James and a third man before being raped by Raheel.

 

Today (Thursday), a judge at the same court sentenced Hassan to 21 years in prison, Raheel to 10-and-a-half years and James to six years behind bars.

Hassan, also known as Manny, is currently serving a 18-year prison sentence for sex offences including multiple child rapes and abductions and was described by his barrister as a "broken man" during today's sentencing hearing.

 

The trial was the latest in West Yorkshire Police's Operation Tendersea investigation into non-recent child sexual exploitation in Kirklees.

Jurors in that trial heard one of the victim's phone numbers was passed around the men's friends and Fred forced her to perform sex acts on Hassan the following year.

Hassan, 32, formerly of Bland Street, Lockwood, Huddersfield, was convicted of five charges in relation to the two victims - four counts of rape and one count of attempted rape.

Raheel, 34, of Upper High Street, Cradley Heath, West Midlands, was convicted of rape of an underage girl and sexual assault of an underage girl in relation to the second victim.

James, 30, of New House Road, Sheepridge, Huddersfield, was convicted of assault of an underage girl by penetration in relation to the second victim.

Zahid Hassan
Zahid Hassan pictured at his first trial in 2018

Prosecutor Kate Batty told the court one of the victims was taken to a flat and given alcohol until she was “unable to talk, unable to stand” and also unable to fight back against “Fred” and “Manny”.

Ms Batty said the pair were heard laughing as they raped her. She added that the second victim was also vulnerable and isolated in a flat.

Raheel was said to have subjected his victim to “humiliation and degradation” by showing off saying he let “his boys go first” and recorded the abuse.

Ms Batty read victim impact statements from both of the women abused by the trio of men.

The first victim said she suffered with feelings of “fear, stupidity, shame and anger". She added that she felt “confused” as to why a normal teenage attraction led to something so traumatic.

Saqib Raheel, 32, who is charged with two counts of rapes, arrives at Kirklees Magistrates Court
Saqib Raheel (Image: Danny Lawson/PA Wire)

The victim’s statement added that she became unable to trust men. She described the shame of being laughed at after being sexually assaulted as “unbearable”.

She continued by saying she kept wondering if the abuse was her fault and whether or not she had been too friendly.

The statement added that despite moving on and finding love, she worries about bringing children into a world where they could be harmed as she was.

She said she felt like a “burden” to her partner and felt more humiliation in the lead up to the trial due to Hassan being able to gain control of her life once again.

Enter your postcode to see crimes reported in your area

Ms Batty added that the second victim suffers from severe anxiety and has struggled with binge-eating as well as suicidal thoughts.

She said she struggles with being in social situations and finds it difficult to keep hold of a job long-term.

Addressing all three defendants, Judge Simon Phillips QC described the grooming as "insidious and persistent".

He said: "The picture that emerged in this trial, just as it had done in earlier trials, is when the abuse began the complainants were children or young persons and they were vulnerable because of family and other circumstances.”

He added: "Some girls were almost senseless when they returned home. Some girls repeatedly went back knowing and expecting they would be abused with fear of consequences if they did not comply.

"These girls were often targeted because of their extreme vulnerability and perceived naivety.”

Judge Phillips QC added the sentences he imposed were "severe" and intended to be so to deter others from behaving in the same way.

He said: "The courts have to do what they can to protect young girls from abuse.”

Sentencing Hassan to 21 years in prison, to run concurrently with his existing 18-year sentence, Judge Phillips QC said: "You treated your victim with apparent contempt. She was described as being like a rag doll as you took it in turns to use and abuse her in the most vile way possible.”

Raheel was jailed for 10-and-a-half years and James was sentenced to six years in prison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Referencing the point about 'high ups' not helping, well, don't trust Keir Starmer given his track record

https://medium.com/@lucynevitt/starmers-shambolic-cps-affabd38bb6d

Starmer’s Shambolic CPS

Starmer’s Shambolic CPS, previously dubbed ‘an enemy to women’, proves he is unfit to serve as a member of parliament, let alone leader of the opposition.

1*2P0W0-wAq8cHJSEHiIbzUw.jpeg
Sir Keir Starmer QC, during his time as Director of Public Prosecutions.

In her role as Home Secretary, Priti Patel has already crafted the attack lines the Labour Party will face if Sir Keir Starmer becomes its next leader. After having been appointed head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in November 2008, Sir Keir’s half decade in the position oversaw cases as large and polarising as the Rochdale grooming gang scandal, mass sexual abuse scandals involving entertainment figures such as Jimmy Savile, and the John Worboys case. Patel noted Sir Keir has a complete ‘lack of interest in prosecuting horrendous crimes against women’, a statement hard to argue with when presented with his record.

Arguably the biggest scandal during his time as DPP came right at the beginning of his tenure. A victim of the Rochdale Grooming gang had reported to Greater Manchester Police the sexual exploitation she’d been experiencing since the age of 15, including becoming pregnant by one of the men abusing her. When referred to the CPS, they decided that the victim was ‘not credible’ and that due to ‘insufficient evidence’ there was an ‘unrealistic prospect of conviction’. Victims continued to be plied with alcohol, drugs and gifts and were prostituted out to multiple men a night, multiple times a week for a further five years.

In 2011, Nazir Afzal, who was then the chief prosecutor in the North West, reopened the case. The evidence previously deemed ‘insufficient’ by Starmer’s CPS — evidence which included DNA and eventually led to 47 other victims allegations — proved vital to securing the convictions of ten men. One of the victims was still not seen as ‘credible’ enough by the CPS because, despite being abused herself, she had later assisted in recruiting other girls to be groomed. The CPS did not want to call her as a witness and had ruled it was not in the public interest to prosecute the men who had abused her, but they needed to use the victim’s evidence. The CPS chose to name this victim as a co-conspirator without informing her that she had been named on the indictment along with the men who had trafficked and raped her. This resulted in social services attempting to remove her child from her custody, and the resignation of the Detective Constable overseeing the case resigning from the force — so that he could publicly criticise the CPS’s treatment of victims.

Local authorities had previously blamed their reluctance to prosecute on the fear of being perceived as racist due to the fact the perpetrators were of South Asian origin and the victims were mostly white British girls. This reluctance and inaction saw a rise in far-right agitation across northern England; a father of one of the victims even joined the BNP for a short period over frustration at the lack of action by authorities. After significant public backlash, Sir Keir was forced to apologise for the mishandling of the case, saying that prosecutors shouldn’t “shy away” from the “issue of ethnicity” which had to be “understood and addressed”, and that ‘a number of assumptions, myths and stereotypes’ about sexual violence had resulted in the previous decision to ‘no further action’ the case.

This response feebly indicated that the CPS needed to review how staff viewed sexual violence and the treatment of victims. Unfortunately, as later demonstrated by repeated failings on such issues, any internal review that may have gone on seems to have further embedded assumptions, myths and stereotypes within the institution. Retrospectively looking at Sir Keir’s language, it is quite clear now that his wording, though seemingly confident on this issue, lacked any substance.

In 2009, whilst Jimmy Savile was still alive, police in Surrey and Sussex referred 4 cases to the CPS alleging that Jimmy Savile had abused 3 girls under the age of 16. Savile was interviewed under caution at Stoke Mandeville Hospital, where one of the incidents allegedly took place in the seventies. Within the same month, the CPS had received the files from police, but dropped the case due to ‘insufficient evidence’’. It would later emerge after Savile’s death that he had abused up to 500 victims over a four-decade period. In 2012 Emily Thornberry, Sir Keir’s former opponent in the current Labour leadership contest, stated that she found it “deeply disappointing” that the CPS was “presented with evidence of a clear pattern of sexual assaults by Savile and decided not to act.”

However, one of the most crucial cases is related to John Worboys, the black cab driver who spiked the drinks of scores of unsuspecting women before sexually assaulting them while they were unconscious in the back of his taxi. Worboys was convicted in 2009 of 19 charges against 12 women. It was suspected that there were over 100 more victims. But Sir Keir ruled not to pursue further charges. What is most interesting about the case is that Carrie Symonds, the current partner of Boris Johnson, was a victim of Worboys. If Sir Keir is elected Labour’s next leader elected, the party would face a situation where they would have not only failed to elect a woman leader, but they would also elected a man who oversaw the mishandling of a high-profile rape case involving the prime minister’s partner.

Sir Keir also oversaw the dramatic decline in the prosecution rate of rape cases as a result of the introduction of new guidance which led to police referring fewer cases to the CPS for charging decisions. The guidance saw an increase in the burden of proof from 50% to 60% which resulted in more complex cases that were more difficult to prosecute being dropped, with thousands of victims seeing their cases ‘no further actioned’ due to ‘insufficient evidence’ and an ‘unrealistic prospect of conviction’. These are the same things the victims of both Savile and the Rochdale grooming gang were originally told, which points to systemic failures resulting in untold numbers of abusers walking free without ever facing trial.

A senior Met officer told the Bureau of Investigative Journalism that ‘referrals (to the CPS) had dropped as a result of policy change put in place in response to the CPS director’s 2011 guidance on charging’. This has contributed to the current crisis in the criminal justice system where campaigners have described rape as being ‘effectively decriminalised’. As a result, the End Violence Against Women and Girls Coalition and Centre for Women’s Justice have brought a judicial review against the CPS for their failure to prosecute rape cases.

Sir Keir also failed to end the process of survivors who are disbelieved by authorities, or who withdraw their allegations from being charged for ‘false reporting’. The fear of false accusations is hugely disproportionate to the frequency of this occurrence. False allegations are extremely rare, ones that are labelled as ‘false’ often result in being true years later or are legitimate allegations that were withdrawn under pressure from the attacker, family and friends or the police.

After Sir Keir’s resignation from the role, he called on the CPS to implement changes to how rape cases were investigated and even helped the Labour Party draw up a victim’s law outlining how it could be done. This was after he had the power to push for these changes himself within the institution. Instead he left deeply held biases and myths go mostly unchallenged, allowing for a culture of disbelief to continue, paving the way for the further decline of conviction rates. Survivors deserve support and justice, but Sir Keir reserved that for a small few choosing suspicion first and foremost, even in cases with multiple victims like the Rochdale grooming gang and Jimmy Savile scandals.

As shown when it comes to sexual violence, Sir Keir is not a man of principle, he won’t champion justice or stand up for human rights, he will actively deny you them. Sir Keir doesn’t believe sex crimes to be in the public interest to prosecute. Evidence of this is on public record for all to see. If Labour Party members ignore Sir Keir’s history at the CPS we risk sending a damning message that his previous judgements as DPP do not matter and by extension those victims who were let down don’t either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use