Jump to content

Namaaz not allowed in Gurdwara


Premi5
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I don't see the point of usIng the gurdwara for prayers 

Muslims can lay down their mats and pray anywhere: on the street, in the park, in a lounge.

But to do this, is like capitulating  

Muslims are probably thinking , " What a bunch of mugs, we do not need to conquer them, they are letting us do this! Alhamidullah! "

They are blocking public parks and roads during Friday prayers hence why they are requesting the use of private places. 

I don't believe there is any necessity to pray in large groups. Hence they can pray at home and should do. Moreover these gatherings are generally politically where they are told what to do to further their jihad. Hence against the public interest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I just wonder if Ravi's subversion is intentional or does he just sleepwalk.

Has he got complete cognitive dissonance?

 He is very supportive of the Yazidi but yet at the same time he inadvertently supports an ideology that trying to support them. Can he really be that blind?

It is like talking about the dangers of type 2 diabetes whilst at the same stuffing your face with a box of Ladoos. 

You see the same mentality with people who are pro-LGBT and who support Sharia Law for muslims, not realising the latter will annilihate the former. 

 

*destroy them not support them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

I just wonder if Ravi's subversion is intentional or does he just sleepwalk.

Has he got complete cognitive dissonance?

 He is very supportive of the Yazidi but yet at the same time he inadvertently supports an ideology that trying to support them. Can he really be that blind?

It is like talking about the dangers of type 2 diabetes whilst at the same stuffing your face with a box of Ladoos. 

You see the same mentality with people who are pro-LGBT and who support Sharia Law for muslims, not realising the latter will annilihate the former. 

 

The Yizidis were enslaved by the Jihadis from India during their various sieges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is sad that it had to be RW Hindus taking the lead to awaken Sikhs to come out and challenge these worthless committees which have no regard for the Rehat Maryada. 

This just shows how deep we have fallen into the pit of liberalism. Just a decade ago it would be Sikhs who would be at the forefront of stopping the dominance of Islam and the Hindus were the liberals who would bend over backwards to appease the Muslims. Now it is the reverse. It is now likely to a Hindu would oppose the idiocy of Namaz in a Gurdwara and Sikhs would be all for it. 

I remember reading a book many years ago and there was a story there that during the Quetta earthquake in 1935 a Hindu widow and her children were forcibly converted to Islam. The Hindu societies in the area knew that the family could not return to Hinduism and live in Quetta. So they looked for a place where they knew that the Muslims of that place would never seek to bring the family back to Islam or attack them. They chose AMRITSAR, not because the Hindus were dominant there, they chose AMRITSAR because although the Sikhs in the city at the time were on 15% of the population, they knew that the Sikhs would never allow the Muslims to have their way with the family. This was the image of the Sikh was to these Hindus then. Would this be the case today? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use