Jump to content

A “Kaur” complaining that “brown” women are not sexualized


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Doesn't erase the day-to-day reality of what actually happens. When you repeatedly say stuff like the above, it seems like you're afraid of encroaching reality, effectively putting your fingers in your ears, and drowning out the surrounding noise.

Not many people outside of places like this forum adhere to the archaic modes of conduct you're describing above. Hell, I'd hazard a guess even most of the people on here behave a lot differently away from this forum to what they actually claim to be doing. But that's just the way of things.

Our people are too soft of CharitroPakyan, claiming Guru Sahib didn’t warn us, yet still got no problem with doing everything it warns us against. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Yep these ones weren’t 

the subject of this thread is Canadian, that sort of stuff (grooming or ‘sexualisation’) seems to be much less prevalent overall 

 

 

 

Nice. And to show you all how it's done:

*deleted*

Look guys! I didn't explode into a thousand pieces!! My identity and self-esteem are still strong!! Yeahh!! lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Women wouldn’t be like this if there weren’t these mass armies of beta simps online who worship them. It’s not religious Kaur who has 100,000+ followers it’s nangi Kaur who does. If a woman got more attention and admiration for being religious then she would follow that path. Just look at Instagram it’s full of Punjabi (mostly Sikh) instathots and 90% of the followers are men. Honestly men are even more pathetic than women at times. Men will do anything for a beautiful woman, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Women wouldn’t be like this if there weren’t these mass armies of beta simps online who worship them. It’s not religious Kaur who has 100,000+ followers it’s nangi Kaur who does. If a woman got more attention and admiration for being religious then she would follow that path. Just look at Instagram it’s full of Punjabi (mostly Sikh) instathots and 90% of the followers are men. Honestly men are even more pathetic than women at times. Men will do anything for a beautiful woman, lol.

Yeah, being more religious after a certain point is a turnoff. ? The nangi Kaur knows what to do to be popular with men who’ll throw money at her. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Jassu said:

Women wouldn’t be like this if there weren’t these mass armies of beta simps online who worship them. It’s not religious Kaur who has 100,000+ followers it’s nangi Kaur who does. If a woman got more attention and admiration for being religious then she would follow that path. Just look at Instagram it’s full of Punjabi (mostly Sikh) instathots and 90% of the followers are men. Honestly men are even more pathetic than women at times. Men will do anything for a beautiful woman, lol.

Some blokes know how to make money off these attention seeking types too. lol 

Not all blokes are simps like you are suggesting. And even the rise of this type can be directly traced to modern western culture, especially the fashion industry, where gay men in power have been promoting these effeminate, 'metrosexual' types - which were really just a gay man's wet dream.

We've been warned by our dharam about women who exploit simps in Charitrio Pakyaan (plus some of us are intelligent enough to see it going on and recognise it for what it is), so those of us who are clued up, know the score. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, californiasardar1 said:

Why does this “actress” use “Kaur” in her name? She should at least have the decency of using her caste surname if she is going to behave like this.

I'd go even further. I'd say they should use a name like Sharon or Tracey Smith if they are that adamant that they want to act a sl@g.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

It's just we (brown b@stards) don't make cringe TV series about these things (and probably a good job too, because the movies would be shyte with some fudhu bhangra singer as the lead, and songs with faggy dance routines being thrown in every 20 minutes......)

We need Daler Mehndi or someone important on this pronto. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use