Jump to content

Sidhu Moosewala joins Congress party


Kau89r8
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

The thing about it is, is we don’t need everyone to be hardcore religious, but rather we need everyone to be loyal to the faith and the community as a whole. Jinnah was a cigarette-loving and pork-loving Muslim guy, but he still came for his Panth on issues he felt were important at the time. Whether some Sikhs end up weaker on the scale of religiosity is less of a problem when compared to politics, we can talk quality over quantity anyday in a spiritual setting, but on a global scale, such things will only push those weak in their faith, but willing to assist us in other ways. 

There's no such thing as loyalty in politics. It's all about getting and retaining power. As without power it is difficult to implement policies you need or want. 

And about Jinnah, you're wrong there. He was a British stooge forced to lead the Muslim League and was dragged from his plush Hampstead lifestyle to do so, in 1933. The fact he managed to do it without detection is testimony to what the media can pull off as they operate on certain agendas they are paid to support. So all actors really. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Kau89r8 said:

 hindus brahmins south indians gujjis compared to us Punjabi  Sikhs in India and in West..they dominating banks, science, med, business, top forbes lists etc...

I don't know if you've watched the latest Russel Peters special (the one set in Mumbai) he says as much at the end. He thinks the southerners are more intelligent than the northerners.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, proudkaur21 said:

e not these rich so called city sikhs who live to end sikhi in their families by trying to assimilate in the cities because they think sikhi is backward.

I think that's too crude. Not all noncity Sikhs are loyal to Sikhi, plenty will do anything to get ahead. And not all city Sikhs are sell outs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

The thing about it is, is we don’t need everyone to be hardcore religious, but rather we need everyone to be loyal to the faith and the community as a whole. Jinnah was a cigarette-loving and pork-loving Muslim guy, but he still came for his Panth on issues he felt were important at the time. Whether some Sikhs end up weaker on the scale of religiosity is less of a problem when compared to politics, we can talk quality over quantity anyday in a spiritual setting, but on a global scale, such things will only push those weak in their faith, but willing to assist us in other ways. 

Good points here.

I'll add the following: we have a fatal flaw in the mindset of those who consider themselves practising or above averagely religious. There's a considerable amount of gatekeeping on the part of these types of people who demand that anyone who wants to speak on Sikh issues or advocate for even positive things needs to be Sant Jarnail Singh 2.0.

Thing is they don't just alienate well meaning Sikhs but go out of their way to antagonise and make enemies of their own people. Congratulations, you've just alienated 99.9% of Sikhs who would otherwise have worked for collective Sikh interests. I'm certain there's a certain provincial protectiveness or jealousy aspect at play, too. So what you get is someone who has dardh for his history and his people thinks, "F**k it, I'll go where I'm not presided over by a bunch of illiterate pendus with zero ideas." Brain drain of sorts which leaves mostly thickos in charge.

The problem for us in the future will be the hardcore Western Punjabi Communist types (crudely referred to as SJWs) who are pushing for things like gay Anand Karaj's, and various other deviant behaviours, etc. The respectful Punjabis stepped back quietly when it was made clear their input wasn't valued. The Marx-influenced Sikhs have no such scruples. When their ideology will achieve complete global cultural victory (I'm guessing within 20 years), these orthodox gatekeepers won't be able to intimidate or force these types of Punjabis out of anywhere. The weirdo Sikhs who post leftist bukwaas on Twitter will infiltrate real life. Then we're truly in the doo-doo.

Jews learned this lesson thousands of years ago and... well, look at the world today and see how well they've done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

Good points here.

I'll add the following: we have a fatal flaw in the mindset of those who consider themselves practising or above averagely religious. There's a considerable amount of gatekeeping on the part of these types of people who demand that anyone who wants to speak on Sikh issues or advocate for even positive things needs to be Sant Jarnail Singh 2.0.

Thing is they don't just alienate well meaning Sikhs but go out of their way to antagonise and make enemies of their own people. Congratulations, you've just alienated 99.9% of Sikhs who would otherwise have worked for collective Sikh interests. I'm certain there's a certain provincial protectiveness or jealousy aspect at play, too. So what you get is someone who has dardh for his history and his people thinks, "F**k it, I'll go where I'm not presided over by a bunch of illiterate pendus with zero ideas." Brain drain of sorts which leaves mostly thickos in charge.

The problem for us in the future will be the hardcore Western Punjabi Communist types (crudely referred to as SJWs) who are pushing for things like gay Anand Karaj's, and various other deviant behaviours, etc. The respectful Punjabis stepped back quietly when it was made clear their input wasn't valued. The Marx-influenced Sikhs have no such scruples. When their ideology will achieve complete global cultural victory (I'm guessing within 20 years), these orthodox gatekeepers won't be able to intimidate or force these types of Punjabis out of anywhere. The weirdo Sikhs who post leftist bukwaas on Twitter will infiltrate real life. Then we're truly in the doo-doo.

Jews learned this lesson thousands of years ago and... well, look at the world today and see how well they've done.

What you have mentioned here is very important.

By alienating well meaning Sikhs (the silent majority) this has allowed a vacuum for the SJW Sikhs to fill the space. It's an own goal.

They are ones who are dictating the direction and they need to be dismantled somehow before they become further entrenched. It is from the inaction from the rest of us that is allowing this to happen.

If you notice that last few threads we have become to identify this particular liberal SJW cultural marxist type of Sikh as a menace within.

Part of this problem we cannot control because it is part of a wider malaise that is impacting many non Sikhs as well. Something needs to change or the pendulum will need to swing.

But when that change happens it will happen.

Which then leaves us back to what we have control over.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
    • Good way of putting it, bro. One of the ongoing themes of Gurbani is the fake saint. Whether it's fake babas in Punjab or English-speaking personalities in the West, it's an continuing problem of religion through the centuries (and it's not exclusive to us by any means, this applies to all human societies).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use