Jump to content

Why are these people so low iq?


proudkaur21
 Share

Recommended Posts

these hindu cowards are scum one saying tht 1000 sikhs were killed in 84 riots if i had twitter id remind this pundit chudail how in 1989 there were anti sikh riots in jammu with shiv sena ppl involved. me personaly i have no sympathy for any of these bus victims tbh they dont care about our dead why should we care about theirs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, justasking said:

these hindu cowards are scum one saying tht 1000 sikhs were killed in 84 riots if i had twitter id remind this pundit chudail how in 1989 there were anti sikh riots in jammu with shiv sena ppl involved. me personaly i have no sympathy for any of these bus victims tbh they dont care about our dead why should we care about theirs

They were not riots it was a state sponsored genocide against Sikhs.

Terrorists who killed innocent bus passengers could never have been Sikhs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, proudkaur21 said:

 

They will talk about those incidences but ignore the planned killings of thousands of Sikh youth in the Panjab throughout the 80s-90s by the Indian government. Were Hindus getting killed wrong? Yes! I'm sure everyone acknowledges this fact! Panjab was basically a warzone where no one was safe. However, these people actively chose to ignore the atrocities that were committed against the Sikhs and the reason why so many started fighting back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, proudkaur21 said:

 

It's an aspect of human psychology. A rational person would accept that the Indian govt and Indira Gandhi planned a massacre both in June 1984 and through her son in November 1984. A non-rational person cannot accept that their govt and their leader did wrong so they have to justify it by claiming that it was in fact their side that were the victims. In order to justify June 1984, they have to make wild claims of thousands of Hindus being massacred prior to the govt organised massacre and for Nov 1984 they use the assassination of Indira Gandhi. Do not be misled by the fact that this women is a doctor because like the west nowadays being a professional does not necessary guarantee that the person is not brainwashed by their political beliefs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, proudkaur21 said:

 

 

3 hours ago, proactive said:

It's an aspect of human psychology. A rational person would accept that the Indian govt and Indira Gandhi planned a massacre both in June 1984 and through her son in November 1984. A non-rational person cannot accept that their govt and their leader did wrong so they have to justify it by claiming that it was in fact their side that were the victims. In order to justify June 1984, they have to make wild claims of thousands of Hindus being massacred prior to the govt organised massacre and for Nov 1984 they use the assassination of Indira Gandhi. Do not be misled by the fact that this women is a doctor because like the west nowadays being a professional does not necessary guarantee that the person is not brainwashed by their political beliefs. 

I don't see anything 'low IQ' here. And a rational person can believe certain things if they are continuosly fed the same lies and/or propaganda. It's sad that that is true, but if I compare myself to 5, 10 , 15 years ago, I would believe a lot more of what I see /hear in media compared to now,

The Indian media/GOI have done a great job at giving Sikhs a poor and false reputation and associations with 'terrorism'. 

However, this one seems to be a 'troll' with previous

 

She's a Kashmiri Hindu. Does these people especially dislike Sikhs ?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not low IQ..they're very cunning ppl..they know saying bold statements like this to attract far-right groups so they can go viral..like what they did with Jagmeet and scream 'Sikh terrorism'

Shes part of Hindu-American foundation ...but i prefer these ppl who are up in your face then liberals Hindus who have exact same hate against Sikhs 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use