Jump to content

India's Four Religions Should Be Together


Dayalkaurkhalsa
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The last few days I have been watching some Abrahamic stuff. A lot of these are debates between Abrahamic 2.0 (Christianity) and Abrahamic 3.0 (Islam)

These two groups ( I cannot really call them a faith or a religion when I hear these guys speak)

They argue like lawyers, trying to prove and disprove each other.

Bhagti of Maharaj is quite a simple thing and these desert middle eastern ideologies are very neurotic and over-complicate everything. They tie themselves like knots.

When the Dharmics (Us Sikhs, Hindu schools and buddhists) debate it is more metaphysical. It is completely different. 

A lot of these theologans in 2.0 and 3.0 are very intellectual but they are fools.

We may reject aspects of the hindus in their mindless rituals and their murti worship, but the framework is completely different. 

When dharmics debate, we are trying to get to the truth, when abrahamics debate they are trying to show dominance and superiority over each other.

I think it is very unfortunate in this world that 4 billion people are categorised under these 2 groups.

What is even stranger is that Abrahamic 1.0 (Jews) look to Dharma.

It is a shame that we call us a "faith" or "religion" because we are using the abrahamic framework to define ourselves. It is far too limiting for us.

We are far better than that.

 

God damn Romans latched onto whatever half-baked nonsensical belief system they could find to hold onto their power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, MisterrSingh said:

God damn Romans latched onto whatever half-baked nonsensical belief system they could find to hold onto their power.

How was Christianity before Rome converted? Idk what Jesus actually taught, as it seems like a lot of the influence is from Romans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MisterrSingh said:

They were persecuted rather severely. Hunted down, repressed, etc. Christian mystics and saints around this time came up with their various apocalyptic texts (The Book of Revelations being the main one) where they had visions of future times (the Second Coming), which supposedly gave them the confidence and belief to strive for a brighter future.

I think I've mentioned it previously, but one of the latter Roman emperors apparently had darshan of Jesus. He then converted to Christianity. Of course, this wasn't the sole reason for Christianity replacing the Roman belief system, but it's a pretty monumental contributor to the 180 turn.

Have you ever watched the film Agora.

You can see what happened to the Pagans as the Christianity took over the Roman Empire. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use