We might physically attack each other!

[shastarSingh]

I hv contact with sikhs from various different organizations.

There is so much distrust and dislike for each other between them, I won't be surprised if they physically attack each other especially if there is some anarchy or disorder in India.

Ideally if there is anarchy in India, Sikhs shud get together and form a sikh state. That's why efforts shud be made NOW to get unity between sikh organizations.

[Premi5]

31 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

I hv contact with sikhs from various different organizations.

There is so much distrust and dislike for each other between them, I won't be surprised if they physically attack each other especially if there is some anarchy or disorder in India.

Ideally if there is anarchy in India, Sikhs shud get together and form a sikh state. That's why efforts shud be made NOW to get unity between sikh organizations.

Where is original post from @ipledgeblue? 

[shastarSingh]

It's a copy paste error.

[dallysingh101]

@shastarSingh

I think a little bit of what you are saying is inevitable. Sell out gadaars are long overdue chittar anyways.  

[shastarSingh]

11 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

@shastarSingh

I think a little bit of what you are saying is inevitable. Sell out gadaars are long overdue chittar anyways.  

It will be good if couple of nindaks of Dasam Granth Sahib are sent to he'll.

But other than that if panthic groups fight with each other, it will be the loss of whole Khalsa panth.

[dallysingh101]

26 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

It will be good if couple of nindaks of Dasam Granth Sahib are sent to he'll.

But other than that if panthic groups fight with each other, it will be the loss of whole Khalsa panth.

Bro, a while ago you asked why those lot in Afghanistan pulled off what they did. A big part of it was a really hardline on gadaar collaborators. That needs to be a big focus for us. That's always been what's let us down in the past. 

[shastarSingh]

6 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Bro, a while ago you asked why those lot in Afghanistan pulled off what they did. A big part of it was a really hardline on gadaar collaborators. That needs to be a big focus for us. That's always been what's let us down in the past. 

Real gaddaars shud be punished.

But our qaum has a tendency that any person they don't like personally, they call him a gaddaar.

So there is a chance that we might start killing each other by calling each other gaddaar.

 

[ipledgeblue]

17 hours ago, Premi5 said:

Where is original post from @ipledgeblue? 

 

17 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

It's a copy paste error.

probably best to edit your original post and fix it so people aren't confused

3 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

It will be good if couple of nindaks of Dasam Granth Sahib are sent to he'll.

But other than that if panthic groups fight with each other, it will be the loss of whole Khalsa panth.

Remember that panthic sampradaiye have been sidelined and forced undercover during the Singh Sabha movement, just so that organisations like SGPC could take control. I call those panthic, though they don't seem to be recognised by the current SGPC associated panth, but they were recognised and blessed by Guru Gobind Singh as well as being recognised by Dal Khalsa panth. Now the panthic definition seems to be used in a corrupted way, used more for those jathebandi/organisations which are associated in an alliance with SGPC and their rehit maryada, and less for those associated with traditional sikh groups such as the Dal Khalsa fauj +puraatan rehit and also those groups forced undercover.

[shastarSingh]

15 minutes ago, ipledgeblue said:

 

probably best to edit your original post and fix it so people aren't confused

Remember that panthic sampradaiye have been sidelined and forced undercover during the Singh Sabha movement, just so that organisations like SGPC could take control. I call those panthic, thought they don't seem to be recognised by the current SGPC associated panth, but they were recognised and blessed by Guru Gobind Singh as well as being recognised by Dal Khalsa panth. Now the panthic definition seems to be used in a corrupted way, used more for those jathebandi/organisations which are associated in an alliance with SGPC and their rehit maryada, and less for those associated with traditional sikh groups such as the Dal Khalsa fauj +puraatan rehit and also those groups forced undercover.

Lately some parcharaks hv got Gobind gita published and hv plans to do its katha.

Damdami taksal Mehta chowk calls itself puratan samparda.

They are scaring these parcharaks to stop their work on Gobind gita.

Had it been anarchy like situation, they might hv physically threatened these parcharaks.

Just because an organization is old, doesn't mean it's 100% right.

 

[shastarSingh]

19 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Lately some parcharaks hv got Gobind gita published and hv plans to do its katha.

Damdami taksal Mehta chowk calls itself puratan samparda.

They are scaring these parcharaks to stop their work on Gobind gita.

Had it been anarchy like situation, they might hv physically threatened these parcharaks.

Just because an organization is old, doesn't mean it's 100% right.

 

Even Sardar Ajmer Singh is critical of Gobind gita.