Is this logic fine or is a sign of cowardice?

[MisterrSingh]

14 hours ago, Jassu said:

It’s not even a sign of cowardice, they’re just retarded. Our religion is literally about taking arms and fighting for our rights when we feel oppressed.

You might want to reassess this idea. "Feel" is what women do. Men should "know" before leaping into action.

[justasking]

11 hours ago, TigerForce1 said:

Cowardice has many shapes and forms when it come down to the topic of ‘Khalistan’.  

Some say the whole world should be Khalistan not just Punjab.

Some say Khalistan should be made in Pakistan Punjab before Indian Punjab.

Some say everyone must become Khalsa before we talk about Khalistan.

Some say Khalistan should only be the demand of people within Punjab.

Some say Referendum will not achieve Khalistan.

Some choose to ignore the subject and stay silent like the majority on this forum.

All are mostly signs of cowardice!  Your wasting your time about this subject on this forum, as the majority of posters here are people who are disconnected from the real world. 

 

 

Khalistan will include indian states of Punjab, Himachal pradesh, Haryana after this is achieved focus should be on caputring lahore, and expanding into kashmir, 

[shastarSingh]

2 hours ago, NaamTiharoJoJape said:

can you specify who you were referring to? 

 

I don't want to name the Khatri Jathedaar and make him popular.

Thing with bhappaas is if a fellow Khatri becomes Jathedaar or sant baba, bhappaas will do his praise as if he is even greater than Guru Sahib.

When this Khatri Jathedaar died, bhappaas started saying that punj pyaras from sachkhand came to take our Jathedaar.

Are these bhappaas brahmgyanis that they can see punj pyaras of sachkhand?

Secondly, so many nice gursikhs do Akal Challaana every month or year, why don't bhappaas say the same about those gursikhs being taken away by punj pyaras?

[Arsh1469]

17 hours ago, justasking said:

Khalistan will include indian states of Punjab, Himachal pradesh, Haryana after this is achieved focus should be on caputring lahore, and expanding into kashmir, 

We need a Sikh state but before talking about all the land we want and what we will conquer think of the logistics. Firstly how to create a state? Who will run it? What will the laws be? How to create an army police emergency services etc. The economics? And so many more. We should talk about these things not about should we have a state but how can we get a state and how will it work.

[5aaban]

Sikh numbers need to be high in Punjab, the percentage there is decreasing day by day. The percentage of Sikh population in Punjab has registered a decline from 59.9% to 57.69% (even though the total population of the community has gone up). 

Sikhs will soon lose majority status in Punjab too, which is the only Sikh-majority place in the world.

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/comment/punjabs-exodus-without-an-end-19414

https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/punjab/migration-may-have-led-to-decline-in-sikh-count-125038

 

[TigerForce1]

11 hours ago, Arsh1469 said:

We need a Sikh state but before talking about all the land we want and what we will conquer think of the logistics. Firstly how to create a state? Who will run it? What will the laws be? How to create an army police emergency services etc. The economics? And so many more. We should talk about these things not about should we have a state but how can we get a state and how will it work.

I should have mentioned that this thought process is also a sign of cowardice.

You buy your house first then you buy your furniture, not the other way round.  When India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were formed, these answers were not demanded before the handover of power and neither have any countries been required to present a written or verbal constitution before attaining freedom.
 

The first stage is freedom from present occupation, the second stage is to manage a peaceful transfer of power and the institutions which are in control, then a constitution is written, then finally you implement and work hard and smart to develop your country with all its institutions.  
 

We are at stage one! 

 

[proactive]

4 minutes ago, TigerForce1 said:

I should have mentioned that this thought process is also a sign of cowardice.

You buy your house first then you buy your furniture, not the other way round.  When India, Pakistan and Bangladesh were formed, these answers were not demanded before the handover of power and neither have any countries been required to present a written or verbal constitution before attaining freedom.
 

The first stage is freedom from present occupation, the second stage is to manage a peaceful transfer of power and the institutions which are in control, then a constitution is written, then finally you implement and work hard and smart to develop your country with all its institutions.  
 

We are at stage one! 

 

The simple way to put it is -;

 

The American declaration of Independence was ratified on 4th July 1776

The US constitution was ratified on June 21 1788. 

[NaamTiharoJoJape]

On 1/7/2022 at 5:18 AM, proactive said:

The simple way to put it is -;

 

The American declaration of Independence was ratified on 4th July 1776

The US constitution was ratified on June 21 1788. 

and there was quite the amount of chaos in the mid 1780s that would have torn the country apart