Jump to content

Hindustani wishing 1984 on Sikhs


Kau89r8
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, proudkaur21 said:

grew up in the city and dont even expect anything from the city sikhs. Only ones that have some anakh are a few rural ones.

They are more like the typical Jatt gangster wannabes that end up turning their lives when they get back to Sikhi and become khrakus types 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kau89r8 said:

Since 47, we've lost alot man..i think apne just get caught up with their egos and Poonjabi Jatt music, inflate their egos, pics of Sant Ji and Khrakus Music and waving flags 'im punjabi not indian', yet cant really get to grips how much we have loss since 47 to 84...and dont want to learn reflect what we need to do for the future. 

100%. We run to goras country and wave khalistan flags. No wonder people laugh at us. Then we talk about loving punjab all the while running away from it. All of us are just talk no action. The real ones are those fighting back home not us. The ones going to jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, shastarSingh said:

Many Sindhi Hindus hv become Sikhs.

Bagri Rajasthani Hindus in sindh hv started becoming sikhs too.

Now the question is why Sikhs hv not been able to convert Hindus in India to Sikhism?

1. We never tried or had a strategy to do so. It's only due to kisan andolan that we hv realized the potential of jaats coming into Sikhism.

2. We hv completely given up simran. We hv become even more mayadhari than fellow Indian people. We are running after money and dollars and parcharaks and brahmgyani babaas are also doing the same.

Sikhi brother, not Sikhism, please

Notice as well, when we act nobly and bravely, it makes people want to convert. When we act arrogantly and haughtily towards others, they want us to die in 84 type genocides. 

I think Sikhi has been suppressed from the colonial era (where they pushed some twisted version of 'Sikhism') and that we've become infected by that vacuum. I think now is the time for things to change, and we become more sophisticated and outwardly expansive in a tactful and respectful way. We have to believe in it ourselves though, if you've got some mixed up, confused identity half-Sikh, half-caste and excessively regional too (and I say that as a Panjabi), how are you going to  teach anyone else - especially a nonPanjabi nonSikh? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Sikhi brother, not Sikhism, please

Notice as well, when we act nobly and bravely, it makes people want to convert. When we act arrogantly and haughtily towards others, they want us to die in 84 type genocides. 

I think Sikhi has been suppressed from the colonial era (where they pushed some twisted version of 'Sikhism') and that we've become infected by that vacuum. I think now is the time for things to change, and we become more sophisticated and outwardly expansive in a tactful and respectful way. We have to believe in it ourselves though, if you've got some mixed up, confused identity half-Sikh, half-caste and excessively regional too (and I say that as a Panjabi), how are you going to  teach anyone else - especially a nonPanjabi nonSikh? 

But we get emotional and attached to punjab because it is our homeland and being exploited and also the fact that it should be sikhi's epicenter just like mecca . So i dont think its bad to be attached to punjab as a sikh? Just like you see christians obsessed with Jerusalem because it is the birthplace of their religion. If punjab wasnt in this state i dont think we would talk about it constantly to this extent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

But we get emotional and attached to punjab because it is our homeland and being exploited and also the fact that it should be sikhi's epicenter just like mecca . So i dont think its bad to be attached to punjab as a sikh? Just like you see christians obsessed with Jerusalem because it is the birthplace of their religion. If punjab wasnt in this state i dont think we would talk about it constantly to this extent.

I get that, I'm emotionally attached to it too. But I'm just saying, if we're going to start mass conversions, we have to get away from that brash, obnoxious, supercilious, loud mouthed Panjabi characteristic too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Many Sindhi Hindus hv become Sikhs.

Bagri Rajasthani Hindus in sindh hv started becoming sikhs too.

Now the question is why Sikhs hv not been able to convert Hindus in India to Sikhism?

1. We never tried or had a strategy to do so. It's only due to kisan andolan that we hv realized the potential of jaats coming into Sikhism.

2. We hv completely given up simran. We hv become even more mayadhari than fellow Indian people. We are running after money and dollars and our parcharaks and brahmgyani babaas are also doing the same.

Bagri Hindus started becoming Sikhs in Pakistan since decades, its not a recent phenomena. The Nanakpanthi Sindhis and Christians coming en masse to Sikhi (saroop wise for Sindhis) has been more of a recent thing (lets say posts 2000s).
We should not forget that a majority of Pak Christians are Dalits as well and conversion to Christianity did not help them uplift their status in society, while they're seeing multiple benefits of becoming Sikhs. Therefore proper initiatives would be good to give out tailor made parchar (it has to be slightly different per target group, just like the Gurus using different metaphors to explain Sikhi when talking to a farmer, priest or trader in Gurbani). 

You'd be surprised to know that many Sikhs who stayed back in Pak adopted Christianity instead of becoming Muslims. I've met many such Pak Christians with Sikh ancestry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use