Boar's blood in amrit to test Muslim converts

[shastarSingh]

6 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

Bhai ji, it might also just be simply down to the legacy of getting nutrition at a time when they were scarce?  

Even the 64 yoginis who are female attendants of Durga/Kaali love drinking blood. It's mentioned in Dasam Granth Sahib.

[GurjantGnostic]

Just now, dallysingh101 said:

@GurjantGnostic

Bro, can you see how this relates to the recent convos on other forums with tonday pretending they are Sikhs even today!

Got that right. 

 

[shastarSingh]

9 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Even the 64 yoginis who are female attendants of Durga/Kaali love drinking blood. It's mentioned in Dasam Granth Sahib.

 

[GurjantGnostic]

2 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

 

Out of likes. Like. 

[proactive]

6 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

Probably an urgent, extreme measure in extreme circumstances? 

I think you're explanation about the likelihood of the goray authors exaggerating things is more plausible. You are right that the circumstances were extreme but it is highly unlikely that they would put pigs blood in Amrit when it would be easier to feed pork instead. Tampering with Amrit would have been viewed as a very extreme thing to do. 

[shastarSingh]

I am thinking  it from a different angle. May be present day Sikhs get too emotional and make an issue out of nothing.

I hv heard people say they believe in Dasam Granth but doing it's parkash alongside Guru Granth Sahib is very wrong.

I feel such people are creating an issue when there is none.

May be 18th century Khalsa was very charrdikala and had no problem in doing double parkash or even triple parkash(Sarbloh Granth).

They had no problem in making kirpan amrit where a single Singh prepared amrit using kirpan instead of khanda and reciting Jap ji Sahib.

They had no problem in adding extra banis like Chandi di vaar alongside 5 baanis while preparing amrit.

May be they had no issue in pouring some boar's blood in amrit to test Muslim converts???

I could be wrong....

Just my thoughts....

[Premi5]

5 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

I am thinking  it from a different angle. May be present day Sikhs get too emotional and make an issue out of nothing.

I hv heard people say they believe in Dasam Granth but doing it's parkash alongside Guru Granth Sahib is very wrong.

I feel such people are creating an issue when there is none.

May be 18th century Khalsa was very charrdikala and had no problem in doing double parkash or even triple parkash(Sarbloh Granth).

They had no problem in making kirpan amrit where a single Singh prepared amrit using kirpan instead of khanda and reciting Jap ji Sahib.

They had no problem in adding extra banis like Chandi di vaar alongside 5 baanis while preparing amrit.

May be they had no issue in pouring some boar's blood in amrit to test Muslim converts???

I could be wrong....

Just my thoughts....

I agree or think most of your points are possible, except I don't just don't think Amrit would be mixed with any type of blood in any situation

3 hours ago, proactive said:

I think you're explanation about the likelihood of the goray authors exaggerating things is more plausible. You are right that the circumstances were extreme but it is highly unlikely that they would put pigs blood in Amrit when it would be easier to feed pork instead. Tampering with Amrit would have been viewed as a very extreme thing to do. 

I agree with this also

[Jacfsing2]

3 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

They had no problem in making kirpan amrit where a single Singh prepared amrit using kirpan instead of khanda and reciting Jap ji Sahib.

I don't believe in Kirpan Amrit, but putting pig's blood in amrit and making a kirpan amrit are 2 completely different things.

[dallysingh101]

7 hours ago, proactive said:

I think you're explanation about the likelihood of the goray authors exaggerating things is more plausible. You are right that the circumstances were extreme but it is highly unlikely that they would put pigs blood in Amrit when it would be easier to feed pork instead. Tampering with Amrit would have been viewed as a very extreme thing to do. 

I think what you are saying is highly plausible too. Especially given how one author made up something about feeding hindus beef and then retracted the statement. 

It's obvious that the first goray to mix with Singhs were both in awe and fearful of them. Also jealous as hell. 

[shastarSingh]

30 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I don't believe in Kirpan Amrit, but putting pig's blood in amrit and making a kirpan amrit are 2 completely different things.

I agree. There is very less chance that boar's blood in amrit is a true happening.

Regarding kirpan amrit for women, there is strong evidence that it happened in hazur Sahib. May be it was done to allow Khalsa fauj to marry local Hindu women and raise kids as Sikhs.

Rest Guru Sahib knows.