Jump to content

Panjab marriages and exodus


5aaban
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

From Guru Nanak Dev Ji it's called Nirmal Paanth to Guru Gobind Sungh Ji Maharaja when it is called, in same fashion, Khalsa Paanth. The entirety of Gurbani, Vaaran, and Ithias indicate the seperate intended and actual nature of Sikhi. To be both seperate and above all other Dharams by the way in the command chain. 

Glad I have you here bro. Can you explain more about how all the Dharams have been squished into Hinduism? And to what degree any of the original Dharams are functioning?

And beyond tending their own Dharams, to be ready to follow our lead in Dharam Yudh, are they applying the teachings contained in the current living form of Sat Guru, Shabad Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Left for us by the incarnations of Vaheguru Akal Purakh themself, the Nehkalank above all things doing his work as only he can in this Kalyug, the previous Devte having failed now three Yughs?

Are the Dharmis fit? Are they resonnating with the Devte and seeing to surpass their previous limitations?

Are Hanuman's forces ready to join in action behind the Khalsa?

Or is hinduism a nationalized political mechanism that both erases all Dharams contained therein, as well as forms the poplace into a violent nationalized mob gone mad reminiscent of the Nazi party?

Like what is hinduism and what Dharam is being demonstrated? 

 

Dharam is demonstrated by one's morals, actions, perceptions and levels of success. If a teaching is not successful then it can be deemed to be either imperfect initself or being imperfectly followed or taught. 

So it is up to us how/what we follow. And if it is incorrect then we are free to change it according to our conscience. 

Hence making it a living philosophy and the reason there are many different thoughts and teaching within Sanathan Dharma. 

At present we are under an attempt to make a One World Religion seemingly based on Islamic teachings. These teachings are dictatorial and probably most suitable for the AI Slavery System being forced on us. 

That is the threat and challenge we are all (non Muslims and even some Muslims) facing and one we must prepare to counter if we are to continue to enjoy Freedoms given to us by our creator. Such as Freedom of Thought and Conscience along with many other freedoms mentioned in our shastras. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, proactive said:

Every Hindu FU.DHU is an expert on Sikhi. 

That's because they are generally better educated as they follow their faith that tells them to become twice born. Hence why Hindus dominate in all fields that require education rather than physical strength. 

And don't forget the Sikh Gurus were all Hindu Khatris so their numbers would automatically reduce as many chose to join the new Panth. 

Many others were forced to boost the numbers to replace the Faujis lost in battle. So there is no Sikh without the Hindu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, proactive said:

The Punjabi Hindu has been in decline since the 1880s. Although they like to claim that they are rooted to Punjab, they are mostly landless. The higher caste Hindus are urban dwellers while the lower castes own very little land. Each decadal census from 1881 to 1941 commented on the decline of the Punjabi Hindu. The decline was actually greater because the Punjabi Hindu population was artificially boosted by the Hindus of Haryana and Himachal which were a part of Punjab during British times. If we look at the core Punjab areas - all of west Punjab and the present east Punjab historically, the Hindu population was declining on a large scale.

The only reason that Hindu population in Punjab has increased  in the last two decades is due to the migration of Bhaiyas from Bihar and UP. So from a declining population the Hindus in Punjab have had their population artificially boosted by migration into Punjab.

What data from Census 2011 show on migrations

Punjab has nearly 2.5 million migrants which is 9% of the total population.  If we take that 100,000 of these could be Sikhs who migrated to Punjab from the rest of India after the genocide of 1984. After 1984 there was also an outmigration from Punjab of Punjabi Hindus who settled in Delhi and Haryana but the numbers were small possibly 20,000 at most and many came back to Punjab in the 1990s. 

If we take off another 200,000 who are Muslim Bhaiyas so that leaves 2.2 million Hindu Bhaiyas who have migrated to Punjab and who are included in the census figures for 2011. 

In 1971 when there were very few Bhaiyas in Punjab the population of Sikhs in Punjab was 60.22% and the Punjabi Hindus were 37.54% after 40 years of migration of Bhaiyas into Punjab in 2011 the Sikh population was 57.69% and the Hindu population was 38.49%.  The population of Punjab was 27.7 million in 2011. 

In absolute numbers Punjab's Hindu population in 2011 was 10.7 million and the Sikh population was 16 million. 

If we deduct these Hindu migrants from the total population of Punjab 27.7 - 2.2  millions bring Punjab's population to 25.5 million. 

Deducting the Hindu Bhaiya population from Punjab's Hindu population 10.7 - 2.2 million bring the Hindu population of Punjab to 8.5 million. 

So without the migration of Hindu Bhaiyas the Punjabi Hindu population was 33.3% and Punjab's Sikh population would have been 62.7% a slight increase from 60.22% 

If we take into account the larger number of Sikh migrants leaving Punjab for abroad compared to the number of Hindus leaving this would make the Sikh population percentage even greater. 

 

 

I think migrants are 50% population of Punjab. Even in the villages of Punjab I dont see any punjabis anymore the last time I visited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/5/2022 at 11:03 AM, Suchi said:

I think many made the eldest son due to Britishers favouring only Kalsa Sikhs with 5 kakkars (replacing 5 hatiar) with jobs, land and opportunities abroad so it was probably an economic decision after they came into power. 

Read about this theory before 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use