Punjabi Hindus

[Jacfsing2]

6 hours ago, SinghPunjabSingh said:

1. Where are you getting your bogus statistics from bro? I don't even think 80% of white folks in NY/NJ hate Sikhs so where you plucked out this 80% of Hindu's hate Sikhs figure I don't know. Have you actually ever been to India? 80% of the Indian population are falsely classified as Hindu's by a small but clever minority of Hindutuva thinkers but no 1 BILLION Hindu's worldwide do NOT hate us! But we have ignored parchaar to them for far too long.

2. Amazing how casually you are dismissing a hypothetical 60million people! So let's say 60million allies or new sehajdhari Sikhs wish to align themselves with the 20million strong existing Panth in India thereby quadrupling the Sikh Panth's population and demographic and political weight by a factor of 4 times why would you oppose that if that would get the Sikh Panth quite close to 100 million strong in short order?

3. So Muslims can convert anybody. Christians can convert anybody. Hindutva thinkers can define anyone who isn't Sikh, Jain, Buddhist or Muslim in India as a Hindu. But Sikhi cannot educate today's so-called non-Sikhs in India as to why Vaisakhi 1699 was the most revolutionary date in History when our Panj Piare from Gujarat, from Odisha, from Karnataka, from Hastinapur and from Sialkot stood up for Truth, Equality and Justice.

4. Can you explain to me how you are a (ghulam) slave in America today?

1. Brava, just ask Hindus in India if they support actual Gursikhs like Sant Jarnail Singh Bhinderwale or Sukhdev Singh Babbar, or even Akal Takht Jathedar: Jagtar Singh Hawara, if you can get even 10% of Hindus to agree that these were proper Gursikhs and heroes, I'll admit to being wrong. 

2. Grow out Panth how exactly? I didn't say they would convert, I just said those 5% of Hindus would be friendly towards us. 

3. When Vaisakhi 1699 happened, we still acknowledged Guru Sahib, I hear from many so-called Sikhs today that Maharaj is a holy book, our psyche has changed from being a religion of Dharam to a religion of western ideals.

4. Only place anyone will ever be truly free is Khalsa Raj.

[SinghPunjabSingh]

On 4/27/2022 at 11:21 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

1. just ask Hindus in India if they support

2. Grow out Panth how exactly? I didn't say they would convert, I just said those 5% of Hindus would be friendly towards us. 

3. When Vaisakhi 1699 happened, we still acknowledged Guru Sahib, I hear from many so-called Sikhs today that Maharaj is a holy book, our psyche has changed from being a religion of Dharam to a religion of western ideals.

4. Only place anyone will ever be truly free is Khalsa Raj.

1. Ok bro educate me on why Hindu's should support this?

2. Many Hindu's saved countless Sikh lives in Delhi during the November 1984 Genocide. So what exactly is wrong in even having say 60million allies like that? Or are you one of those thinkers that define Sikhs as a 2% minority in east Punjab as you only count folks like Parkash Badal as Sikhs hence you feel we don't need any sehajdhari non-Punjabi's to join the Sikh Panth for Sarbat da Bhala?

3. You didn't answer the question: So Muslims can convert anybody. Christians can convert anybody. Hindutva thinkers can define anyone who isn't Sikh, Jain, Buddhist or Muslim in India as a Hindu. But Sikhi cannot educate today's so-called non-Sikhs in India as to why Vaisakhi 1699 was the most revolutionary date in History when our Panj Piare from Gujarat, from Odisha, from Karnataka, from Hastinapur and from Sialkot stood up for Truth, Equality and Justice.

4. Yes we all know that Begumpura will never exist anywhere outside of Khalsa Raj, however, again you did not answer the question, which was, Can you explain to me how you are a (ghulam) slave in America today?

[S1ngh]

A person that does their best to please other people even if it means disowning their own racial identity. We have a lot of these types in our kaum; including here.

[dallysingh101]

7 hours ago, S1ngh said:

A person that does their best to please other people even if it means disowning their own racial identity. We have a lot of these types in our kaum; including here.

Or maybe some people put a much higher value on other parts of their identity over the racial aspect? 

The whole 'racialising' of the quom  was never a Sikh thing anyway and only emerged after the 'annexation' in any case. We've also got a lot of simple minded people in our quom too, ones that follow any simple narrative in terms of identity because in reality, they probably don't have the mental capacity/ability for any higher thinking in this department. 

Look where it's got us. It's turned us into a tribe of barn dance loving peasants, who love prancing about in front of everybody given half a chance.