Jump to content

Is Punjabi 5500 years old?


shastarSingh
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, dallysingh101 said:

@shastarSingh

Veer, let me ask you another question:

 

What genetic similarities/overlap do you think modern Panjabis have compared to the inhabitants of the region 2500 years ago?  

9. Enamel part of teeth of Harappa people were studied in the University of Florida. The results proved that enamels were of the people of Harappa and there was no mix up from any other outsiders.

10. Dr. Mayell says that the skeleton of Harappa is the same as that of Punjabi people, therefore, they spoke Punjabi language

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

9. Enamel part of teeth of Harappa people were studied in the University of Florida. The results proved that enamels were of the people of Harappa and there was no mix up from any other outsiders.

10. Dr. Mayell says that the skeleton of Harappa is the same as that of Punjabi people, therefore, they spoke Punjabi language

That's the thing. Panjabis have become seriously genetically mixed up since then. Wave after wave of invasions, and even people settling.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/dravidian-language-family-is-4-500-years-old-finds-international-study/story-xRsAAzj5wqOIVPAgd3TkWL.html

 

This study confirms, for instance, that Dravidian speakers were present in the subcontinent before the Indo-Aryan speakers arrived (around 3,500 years ago). We know about this from Dravidian (word) loans into Sanskrit but this is a confirmation,” said lead author Annemarie Verkerk of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany

It goes back to the last battle for this planet is what it goes back to. The last apocolypse. Punjabi came off a ship. It's the language of the God's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, shastarSingh said:

The research of G S Sidhu that I posted in this thread mentions the similarities between punjabi and Dravidian languages. Some sounds in rig veda are not present in Sanskrit but are present in Punjabi and Dravidian languages. 

Panjab university declared some time back that Punjabi is a descendant of proto Dravidian language.

Below research also says that indus valley civilization which includes harrappa civilization spoke proto Dravidian language. Even the language of Mesopotamia civilization was influenced by proto Dravidian language.

https://www.indiatoday.in/amp/science/story/indus-valley-people-spoke-ancient-dravidian-language-claims-new-research-1842718-2021-08-19

The Dravidian language and culture has been debunked. 

https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/article30217467.ece

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use