Jump to content

Isreal attacks -The changing face of the world


Recommended Posts

On 11/2/2023 at 2:13 PM, Kau89r8 said:

think you mistaken ... have you seen raja warring lately ...guys next beant

one thing i think what we can learn from with this whole conflict is looking at the power of Islamic countries and helpless/anger Palestine's/Muslims feelings at their leaders/ gulf states..

We are not investible having our 'own' sell-outs i guess 

@Jai Tegang! @Ranjeet01

The muslim countries do not care about the Palestinians as they are quite troublesome. 

However, because Israel is there then they seem to show some care for the Palestinians. 

The muslim's problem with Israel is that it is Jewish. 

The Gulf countries (with exception of Qatar) are more interested in fermenting economic links with Israel.

Here some facts about the Palestinians. 

Most of the population of Jordan is Palestinan and they tried to overthrow the monarchy there. Read up about Black September. Do you know who helped out the Jordanians, the Pakistanis. 

Lebanon had a civil war from about 1975 to 1990. Do you know how it largely? The very large Palestinian refugee camps there. PLO was based in Lebanon.

Kuwait had a large Palestinian population. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, who did the Palestinians support? The Iraqis. The Kuwaitis expelled the Palestinians. 

Now with the Gaza war, there is pressure for Egypt to accept the Gazans by opening up the border.  Egypt is reluctant to, even though between 1948 to 1967 they controlled Gaza.

That is because once the Gazans leave for Egypt, Israel will never allow them back.

The Israelis in my view are playing a very clever game. They allowed for Oct 7th to happen, so they can create the circumstances to push the Gazan population to the southern part.

My observations is that they will probably reduce the Palestinian population drastically not through genocide but by pushing them into Egypt. Northern Gaza will probably be some militarized buffer zone and Hamas will largely be eradicated. What remains of Gaza will be a rump strip even tinier than before.

Once they have dealt with Gaza, they will try to normalise relations with Saudi Arabia. 

Then they will either go for Iran, which if there is ever a regime change there could mean dried up support for Hezbollah which means Israel will shore up their Northern borders. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

The muslim countries do not care about the Palestinians as they are quite troublesome. 

However, because Israel is there then they seem to show some care for the Palestinians. 

The muslim's problem with Israel is that it is Jewish. 

The Gulf countries (with exception of Qatar) are more interested in fermenting economic links with Israel.

Here some facts about the Palestinians. 

Most of the population of Jordan is Palestinan and they tried to overthrow the monarchy there. Read up about Black September. Do you know who helped out the Jordanians, the Pakistanis. 

Lebanon had a civil war from about 1975 to 1990. Do you know how it largely? The very large Palestinian refugee camps there. PLO was based in Lebanon.

Kuwait had a large Palestinian population. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, who did the Palestinians support? The Iraqis. The Kuwaitis expelled the Palestinians. 

Now with the Gaza war, there is pressure for Egypt to accept the Gazans by opening up the border.  Egypt is reluctant to, even though between 1948 to 1967 they controlled Gaza.

That is because once the Gazans leave for Egypt, Israel will never allow them back.

The Israelis in my view are playing a very clever game. They allowed for Oct 7th to happen, so they can create the circumstances to push the Gazan population to the southern part.

My observations is that they will probably reduce the Palestinian population drastically not through genocide but by pushing them into Egypt. Northern Gaza will probably be some militarized buffer zone and Hamas will largely be eradicated. What remains of Gaza will be a rump strip even tinier than before.

Once they have dealt with Gaza, they will try to normalise relations with Saudi Arabia. 

Then they will either go for Iran, which if there is ever a regime change there could mean dried up support for Hezbollah which means Israel will shore up their Northern borders. 

 

Yes exactly, no Arab country actually wants Palestinians living amongst them for the reasons you gave. Israel even withdrew from Gaza completely in 2006 but Hamas still continued to launch rocket attacks. 

There is no outrage amongst muslims about the atrocities in Yemen and Syria. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChardikalaUK said:

 

Yes exactly, no Arab country actually wants Palestinians living amongst them for the reasons you gave. Israel even withdrew from Gaza completely in 2006 but Hamas still continued to launch rocket attacks. 

There is no outrage amongst muslims about the atrocities in Yemen and Syria. 

It gives an interesting insight into the muslim psyche. 

Muslim kill Muslim: no outrage

Muslim kill non-Muslim: no outrage

Non-Muslim kill Muslim: outrage, but this is conditional. Broken down to:

Non-muslim kill non-Arab Muslim: some outrage, but down the pecking order.

Unapologetic Non-Muslim kill non-arab Muslim: even less outrage as Muslim gets scared.

Non-muslim kill Arab muslim: complete uproar.

What needs to be seen is how a non-apologetic genocidal ruthless non-muslim kill arab muslim.

People may think the Israelis are, but the Jews could easily wipe out the Gazan population if they wanted to.

If the Jews were sadistic, they would flood those tunnels where the Hamas are holed up.

However, there are calls for a ceasefire and the concern is those 2 million Gazans being refugees and shoved into Europe. 

We are seeing what is happening with all these Syrians and Iraqis coming into Europe. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its feels like Mughals being hamas and Jews being gangu brahmins ofc good intention ppl both sides

Ya i mean rest muslim countries could have become like Switzerland and would not have to worry about israel 

Then again Jews have so much power in Western countries playing the holocaust card again and again..

There are crazy right wing jews extremists but if you call them out you become AnTiSeMiTic

Still feel more empathic towards palestines the collective punishment is evil and those right wing zionists are cruel and sadistic 

Its also a holy war. Muslim version of Shaheed .. at least they have huge number give birth 6+ kids ours are 1/2 

also seeing how many jews being siding with hinduvatas over last few yrs against Sikhs feel way more empathic of Palestines...

Muslim are cooking something up for sure they are planning a revenge .. '9/11',... they have united the Muslims world more then ever...

@Ranjeet01 we may as Sikhs feel helpless of our our kaum gaddars but is present in one way or another point i was making. Even with Russian vs Ukraine war  all the western countries are useless there too.. can't win apart giving billions to ukraine 

Same with Armenia being oldest Christian countries yet no Western countries supported them either.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ranjeet01 said:

It gives an interesting insight into the muslim psyche. 

Muslim kill Muslim: no outrage

Muslim kill non-Muslim: no outrage

Non-Muslim kill Muslim: outrage, but this is conditional. Broken down to:

Non-muslim kill non-Arab Muslim: some outrage, but down the pecking order.

Unapologetic Non-Muslim kill non-arab Muslim: even less outrage as Muslim gets scared.

Non-muslim kill Arab muslim: complete uproar.

What needs to be seen is how a non-apologetic genocidal ruthless non-muslim kill arab muslim.

People may think the Israelis are, but the Jews could easily wipe out the Gazan population if they wanted to.

If the Jews were sadistic, they would flood those tunnels where the Hamas are holed up.

However, there are calls for a ceasefire and the concern is those 2 million Gazans being refugees and shoved into Europe. 

We are seeing what is happening with all these Syrians and Iraqis coming into Europe. 

 

It's true, that's why there was no widespread outrage about the massacres against the Gujarati/Rohingaya/Uyghur muslims. 

Anyway they are a violent people. Live by the sword die by the sword. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ChardikalaUK said:

It's true, that's why there was no widespread outrage about the massacres against the Gujarati/Rohingaya/Uyghur muslims. 

Anyway they are a violent people. Live by the sword die by the sword. 

They are a violent people, the tried and tested way is to mete out even more violence against them. That is the language they understand. The more violent you are, the less violent and more reasonable they become.

You will see how quickly they capitulate and go into "treaty" mode.

Our violence comes from defense, theirs come from where there is no resistance. They are bullies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, realist17 said:

You can say the same applies for us. 

Our capacity for violence is greater but we have different attitude to living by the sword than they have. Our relationship to the shaster is one of reverance and respect.

But in your reply, you have shown a quality that Sikhs typically have that muslim in general don't.

And that is the level of humility and introspection to look at our own flaws. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, realist17 said:

You can say the same applies for us. 

We have never been a people about needless conquest and forcing others to believe in our religion. Even Maharaja Ranjit Singh's conquest of Muslim majority Greater Punjab, Kashmir and Khyber Pakhtunkwa were motivated by self defence against Muslim aggression. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share


  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Was listening to Sant Ji's katha on youtube.  Sant ji stated apart from the traditional raags, there is nothing wrong if Kirtan is sung in other NON - Raags set up by our Guru Ji's.  His example: Think of poison in a bowl.  Drinking the poison then blaming the bowl is silly. The poison is bad not the bowl. Likewise, we will never call a bowl Amrit once it contains Amrit init. Sameway it's not the raags being good / bad... it's WHAT we put into those raags. How many times Kirtan was sung but on a track of sum Bollywood tune? It is happening in Gurudwara by Raagis! Youtube also has Kaweshri jatha singing history of 1984, on Dr Dre's - Still Dre track.  Rap instrumental/ Bolly tunes stand neutral. We can either put bad things and sing with our own remixes and lyrics... or we can recreate to sing Shabads of Gurbabi, kirtan and Sikh Prachaar over them. 
    • Everything in Gurbani points us towards the Atma. Atma and Parmatma are the same… Atama and Parmatma is the source that creates and causes everything… What have the following items got in common? A fan. A television. A fridge. A radio. A computer..? These things are powered by electricity. Without electricity these things are lifeless. It’s the electricity that causes these things to function… Atma is the source of energy that allows everything to happen.    without Atma, we are lifeless… Call this Atama RAGUNATH…call this Atma by any other name…the fact remains that it’s the life force energy… Dieties also have the same Atma as humans, but they still part of the creation, and not the creator…  
    • Hi I want to know who’s ragunath in gurbani Hindu claim this word appear for ram chandra if we read guru teg bahadur maharaj salok maharaj clearly rejecting ram gayo ravan geo but at the last pangti Kahu naanak īh bipaṭi mai tek ēyk ragɦunaaṭɦ ॥55॥ Says Nanak, in this calamity, the Lord alone is my support who is this ragunaath why would maharaj use ragunath as refrence for god?
    • Throughout history we have been tested and tried. We remained steadfast and resiliant. The events that took place in Punjab and outside of Punjab in the past years made it quite clear we are big players in the game which kept the world powers on edge. It started off with the drug pandemic in Punjab, to the uproar by Bhai Amritpal Singh to the Farmer's protest. Outside of Punjab the deaths of Avtar Singh Khanda (UK) and Hardeep Singh Nijjar (Canada) created a stir within our community. This was probably our first real opportunity to establish something but how quickly members of our own community forget history. We have been a threat to civilization in the past and this is probably what the world powers are concerned about. However, may we continue grow and learn through Gurbani and like Jaswant Singh Khalra said: 'May the spirit of equal rights Punjab continue to kindle'. 
    • This is why people used to get married earlier in puratan times. Think about it, nowadays you legit have to be brahmacharya at ages when you're supposed to be married and producing children, which historically speaking, is unprecedented outside of the Sants in Indic tradition. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use