Jump to content

Historical Proof for Keskee Kakaar


Recommended Posts

The following was posted on www.tapoban.org phorum by the Admin. I

think it will be added to literature section soon.

*********************

Author: Admin

Date: 05-07-03 22:00

The issue of keskee being a kakaar can be addressed from two different angles. The first being historical and the second being purely logical.

Historical: The most convincing evidence that Keskee was given as a kakaar at first amrit sinchaar comes from the Guru Keeaan Sakheean. These are records from Bhatts, or poets who recorded events. This is the most authentic record of what happened. These Guru Keean Sakheean were published by Piara Singh Padam.

The following is a great link about these puraatan writings, dated

around 1708: http://www.sikhreview.org/march2001/chronicle.htm

Some of the most convincing passages read like this: "Assigning the

word Singh first to his own name and thence to the names of all the Five

Chosen Sikhs, Guru ji called out Fateh (the victory salutation) and raised

aloud the spirited chant of Sat Sri Akal.

"Thereafter, Guru ji pronounced, 'on your rebirth in the Khalsa Panth, your previous lineage, caste, creed, calling, customs, beliefs and superstitions, etc. stand annulled from now onwards. Transforming you into the Order of Khalsa, I have endowed you with the apparel of the Almighty God, you shall have to keep its honour. Before administering this nectar of steel, I also bestowed you with five kakaars (Ks, i.e. defining emblems). You have neverto keep them away from your body even by mistake. I gave you, at the start,

a blue keski, kan

gha, kirpan, sarbloh ka kara and white kachhehra. In the event of the loss or misplacement of any of these, get its infringement pardoned in the Sangat by going to Gurdwara without any delay."

Another account by a different bhatt in the same records reads: "Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji Tenth Guru, son of Guru Tegh Bahadur Ji, in the year Seventeen Hundred Fifty Two, on Tuesday - the Vaisakhi day - gave Khande-Ki-Pahul to Five Sikhs and surnamed them as Singhs. First Daya RamSopti, Khatri resident of Lahore stood up. Then Mohkam Chand Calico Printer of Dawarka; Sahib Chand Barber of Zafrabad city; Dharam Chand Jawanda

Jat of Hastnapur; Himmat Chand Water Carrier of Jagannath stood up one after the

other. All were dressed in blue and he himself also dressed the same way.

Huqqah, Halaal, Hajaamat, Haraam, Tikka, Janeyu, Dhoti, were prohibited.

Socialization with the descendants of Prithi chand (Meenay), followers of

Dhirmal and Ram Rai, clean shaven people and Masands was prohibited. All

were given Kangha, Karad (***Karad is synonomous with kirpaan***),

KESGI, Kada and Kachhehra. All were made Keshadhari. Everyone's place of birth

was told to be Patna, of residence as Anandpur. Rest, Guru's deeds are known

only to the Satguru. Say Guru! Guru! Guru! Guru will help everywhere."

In the story of how Satguru Gobind Singh jee iniated Baba Banda Singh

Bahadur in the puraatan Guru Keeaan Sakheean, it is written that Guru jee himself tied a "keskee" on his head.

Other rehitnamas such as Bh. Daya Singh insist that all Sikhs should wear

dastaar, but the Bhat Vehis leave no doubt that Keskee is a kakaar. A

Version of the Bhai Chaupa Singh rehitnama also contains the famous lines

"kachh kaRa kirpaan kangha keskee, eh panj kakaaree rehit dhaaray, sikh

soee". The interesting feature of the rehitnamas however is that they

themselves acknowledge that they are not authoritative and complete sources

for rehit. In more than one rehitnama you'll

find a disclaimer that the

complete rehit is that which was given by the punj pyaaray, the one written

is just a supplement. Not any of the authoritative rehitnamas actually give

a list of the "five kakaars". This is only found in the puraatan Bhatt Vehis.

It's often brought up that Guru Gobind Singh jee himself has written of kes

as a kakaar in the Kabul hukumnama. It can't be stressed enough that the

Kabul Hukumnama is universally considered a fake. It does not follow the

traditional hukumnama format. It does not contain the nishaan of Satguru

Gobind Singh at the top nor a personal message by him. The hand writing is

clearly not by Guru Saahib and contains only the writing of a scribe. But in

all traditional hukumnamas, the top portion always contains a message and

manglacharan by the Guru in his own hand to authenticate the hukumnama. Dr.

Ganda Singh has collected all the historical hukumnamas in his book

"Hukumnamey" and he does not include this hukumnama in that book, due to it

being a blatant fake. This hukumnama has come into prominence in recent

years only.

A Second point that is often brought up is that Guru Saahib in Dasam Granth

has written of kes as kakaar in the shabad "nishanay sikhee...". It is

important to understand that this shabad is not considered part of the body

of Dasam Granth. It was not added by Bhai Mani Singh and is not contained in

puraatan saroops. In present day saroops of Dasam Granth it is included in

the last pages but as an Appendix. The numbering at the top of those pages

is done in Gurmukhi letters to indicate that they are an appendix and not

part of the body. The Shabad in question appears on the appendix "gugga".

Analysis of the language used and the date this shabad started to appearmake it clear that it is a later addition.

Overall, the historical writings leave no doubt that Keskee is a kakaar. In

fact, wherever the term "kakaar" ha

s been found in historical writings,keskee is listed as one.

Logical: No jathebandee in the Panth today can deny that women and men

in Gurmat have equal rights and responsibilities. If men must wear a

dastaar and keskee, then women also must do so. All are Khalsa, no Khalsee exists.

No Singh can receive amrit with braided hair or bun at the back of the head,

so why can a Bibi? There is complete equality. Khalsa is beyond gender and

hence, all rehits and kurehits are the same for all Khalsa.

2ndly, all the kakaars are external. The Guru has bestowed the Kakaars to

the Sikh during amrit sinchaar. Guru Saahib did not bestow kesh. These are

naturally occuring on most humans. The panj pyaaray can dress the

abhilaakhee in all kakaars but cannot give the abhilaakhee Kesh. In the

Banda Singh Bahadur story in the Bhatt Vehis, Guru Gobind Singh himself

dresses Banda in the Kakaars and the story makes a point of saying how

keskee is tied by Guru Saahib. Kesh thus is a naturally occuring thing, not something bestowed during amrit sinchaar.

If kesh is a kakaar, then why the need to say "don't cut kesh" as a bujjer kurehit? If I must keep the kesh, then obviously I cannot cut them. If a Sikh removes any kakaar, he must appear before the Punj Pyaaray and receive a tankhah but is not considered a patit and amrit is not re-administered. If a Sikh cuts the Kesh, s/he is bujjer kur ehitee, patit and must be re-initiated into the Khalsa. Thus it is clear that kesh cannot be a kakaar.

Kesh are not a kakaar, but much above kakaars. To maintain kesh, two

kakaars are given: kangha and keskee.

Thus, even logically looking at the evidence, Kesh clearly cannot be a kakaar. During the early 1800s a rot set into the Sikh community where many old principle and rehits were lost. Many enemies of the Panth encouraged the

abolition of fundamental rehits. At this time Sikh women stopped receiving

khanday kee paahul (and in some jathas/places ie. Hazoor Saahib they sti

llreceive Kirpaan Kee Paahul, not Khanday kee). Women stopped wearing

Kachheras and keskee also was lost. In 1900s, there was a big struggle to

make kacherras mandatory again for women and the re-popularising of Khanday

kee Paahul. Some women had remained strict in rehit in some places and some

jathas, but it was rare. The rehit of keskee was maintained even at the Akal

Takhat for women till 1930 until the Jathedar, Gurmukh Singh Mussafir

removed this condition. There has been significant improvement from the dark

days of the 1800s and pre-Singh Sabha, but unfortunately the whole Panth has

not embraced Keskee as a kakaar yet. Hopefully in the near future, just as

women were restored the right to receive Amrit and keep other kakaars, they

too will be restored the kakaar of Keskee.

With this, we encourage all other seekers to read the article in the

"Gurmat" section on Keskee. We, as was mentioned earlier, will not entertain

any debate on keskee as all that needs to be said has now been said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yeh it's true, we shouldn't be lazy and need to learn jhatka shikaar. It doesn't help some of grew up in surrounding areas like Slough and Southall where everyone thought it was super bad for amrit dharis to eat meat, and they were following Sant babas and jathas, and instead the Singhs should have been normalising jhatka just like the recent world war soldiers did. We are trying to rectifiy this and khalsa should learn jhatka.  But I am just writing about bhog for those that are still learning rehit. As I explained, there are all these negative influences in the panth that talk against rehit, but this shouldn't deter us from taking khanda pahul, no matter what level of rehit we are!
    • How is it going to help? The link is of a Sikh hunter. Fine, but what good does that do the lazy Sikh who ate khulla maas in a restaurant? By the way, for the OP, yes, it's against rehit to eat khulla maas.
    • Yeah, Sikhs should do bhog of food they eat. But the point of bhog is to only do bhog of food which is fit to be presented to Maharaj. It's not maryada to do bhog of khulla maas and pretend it's OK to eat. It's not. Come on, bro, you should know better than to bring this Sakhi into it. Is this Sikh in the restaurant accompanied by Guru Gobind Singh ji? Is he fighting a dharam yudh? Or is he merely filling his belly with the nearest restaurant?  Please don't make a mockery of our puratan Singhs' sacrifices by comparing them to lazy Sikhs who eat khulla maas.
    • Seriously?? The Dhadi is trying to be cute. For those who didn't get it, he said: "Some say Maharaj killed bakras (goats). Some say he cut the heads of the Panj Piyaras. The truth is that they weren't goats. It was she-goats (ਬਕਰੀਆਂ). He jhatka'd she-goats. Not he-goats." Wow. This is possibly the stupidest thing I've ever heard in relation to Sikhi.
    • Instead of a 9 inch or larger kirpan, take a smaller kirpan and put it (without gatra) inside your smaller turban and tie the turban tightly. This keeps a kirpan on your person without interfering with the massage or alarming the masseuse. I'm not talking about a trinket but rather an actual small kirpan that fits in a sheath (you'll have to search to find one). As for ahem, "problems", you could get a male masseuse. I don't know where you are, but in most places there are professional masseuses who actually know what they are doing and can really relieve your muscle pains.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use