Dharamaraj!!!!!
why use Hindu apostle of death?
make it Dharamraj singh
are u just here to cause trouble?
trouble?
why are u troubled by my simple sarcasm?
i m amused by some sikhs (that would mean ALL of the posters on this forum, right?)
desperate attempts to disown their roots
if you want a separate identity, separate DHARAM (not PANTH as Great Guru envisaged)
you would have to invent theology all over again.
just throw dharamrajs and Rams and Durgas and shivas and dharam and satyug where they belong - dustbin. Get new icons, new idols, maybe also new scriptures.
let the disseverance be absolute and also throw dasm granth with the above-named brahminical vestiges.
and also make intolerance as the principal tenet of your new DHARAM
and dont forget to sack all the brahmins from your newly acquired theology
do it even if it means sacking TRUE martyrs like mati dass, sati dass, dayala, mani singh, majority of poets/ bhagats quoted in adi granth. also throw off the shackles put in by the deeds of hindus like Banda bahadar who avenged the Great Guru's humiliation only to be betrayed by the 'Khalsa braves" himself.
and i am v confident khalsas can do it
havent they reinvented sikh history to this extent that you cant decipher myhtology from history?????
and no i am not here to create 'trouble' unless u call 'independent perspective' by that name
and yes i am Guru ka daas
that Guru who never mentioned anywhere that he is creating SIKH DHARAM
that guru (and his predecessors) who never stopped leading a Grishth Hindu's life wearing holy thread and getting tilaks when guru gaddi was handed to them.
i still have faith in that Guru even though he strictly followed casteism
if you are even more troubled after reading this post, you and your ilk need a serious reality check