Jump to content

THE WARRIOR

Members
  • Posts

    366
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by THE WARRIOR

  1. Attmas quality is the same as Prathmas quality, both being limitless, infinite, immeasurable. Yes we may try to understand the secular existence or one particular personality but the primary Attma infused within is Prathma itself and is immeasurable. So far as to say the single Attma that is contributed to your own self is also unlimited it can multiply inexhaustibly. So one can be one or ten or whatever.

    Creation however vast it may appear and unlimited does have limitations. It is immense but its very nature is unbiased without preference however it remains only the Sargun quality of Nirgun Nirinkar. So creation is happening all the time but it can cease at any time. The soul or attma cannot be destroyed in a tangible sense as creation or the body can.

  2. My imagination tells me if we apply your theory of Buddha really being Balram you'll find you're one Avatar short, and there were in fact twenty three avatars and not twenty four as stated in Dasam Granth and other puranic texts.

    Balarama being substituted as Bhudha per Hindu mythology does not lessem the number of Avatars.No remains 24 only.

    Balarama, Krishna and Buddha are accounted for in the 24 incarnations of Vishnu, if Buddha is really Balaram and are the same personality that makes one less. Doesn’t it? Or am I missing something?

    BTW I totally disagree with the theory.

  3. My imagination tells me if we apply your theory of Buddha really being Balram you’ll find you’re one Avatar short, and there were in fact twenty three avatars and not twenty four as stated in Dasam Granth and other puranic texts.

    Why would Vishnu incarnate as Krishan and a brother Bala at the same time? Bala means young youthful balak, also it describes the spiritual powers possessed by a Buddha or bodhisattva, and the strength and power of Vishnu.

    Warrior

    What are your sources of above .Just imagination?

    Read below

    http://www.webindia123.com/religion/hinduism/gods/incar.htm

    8) Balarama, the elder brother of Sri Krishna, is the eighth incarnation. His adventures include the slaying of the ape Dvivida and the demon Dhenuka, shaking the ramparts of Hastinapura (the capital city of the Pandavas) and dragging the river Yamuna out of its course.

    9) Sri Krishna, the ninth incarnation of Lord Vishnu, is the most popular. He was the charioteer of Arjuna in the battle of Kurukshetra in Mahabharata. To the Hindus, Sri Krishna is the supreme statesman, warrior, hero, philosopher and teacher. He is the great expounder of the 'song celestial', the Bhagavad Gita.

    10) The tenth Avatara is Kalki. It is believed that he will descend upon the earth at the end of the present age (Kali Yuga). Riding on the back of a white horse, with a drawn sword, he will destroy the enemies of Dharma and re-establish it in all its glory.

    The list of incarnations of Vishnu sometimes include Buddha instead of Sri Krishna or Balarama.

  4. Why would Vishnu incarnate as Krishan and a brother Bala at the same time? Bala means young youthful balak, also it describes the spiritual powers possessed by a Buddha or bodhisattva, and the strength and power of Vishnu.

    What crap are you quoting. This is the same stuff used by RSS to claim Guru Nanak was avtaar of Vishnu, just as they claim Buddha was avtaar of Vishnu. This is what hindus want to hear, that Guru Nanak had no special mission and his philosophy was only borrowed from ancient hindu texts and why worship the duplicate copy (Guru Nanak) when you have the original (Vishnu).

    Gautama the first Buddha was an avatar of Vishnu as stated in Choubis Avatar. Guru Nanak Dev Ji however was not an Avatar of Vishnu or any other.

    I have read chaubis avtar.There are two school of thoughts among Hindus.One says that the person Bhudha is a name given to Bala a brother of krishna.So Baudh avtar as mentioned in Chaubis avtar is a refrence to Bala.Nowhere it says that he ws Gautma the budha.The title is baudh avtar.It is a few lines of composition.Guru ji writes nothing much is clear about this avtar.

  5. Marriage as we understand it is a need for the mind emotion and body it is not a spiritual need as there is no such thing as a two people who are soul mates. The Attma is more yearning for its true soul mate Pratama, here yes marriage is a true marriage, Gurbani also explains this to us.

    This does not conclude we divorce ourselves from life, we can enjoy the journey successfully. My point is only that we should at least learn to understand our needs, what is needed for my mind, my emotion, my physical body and my Attma.

    Consciously one can learn to understand oneself better if he or she understands why one is behaving the way one is and what part of their existence one is catering to and fulfilling without bull crapping themselves about their true motive.

  6. Maybe Nanaks way had always been the way even before him, as time passes corrosions set in. The concept of one omnipresent creator is not unique to Sikhi. In Dasam Granth Guru Gobind Singh ji explains his purpose in coming to this earth, in short those charged with responsibility to enlighten the masses having shortcomings, they were a few. Guru Ji doesn’t condemn society or and belief system as a whole; only the condemnation of empty religious actions and the perpetrators of such actions who lead people astray.

  7. What crap are you quoting. This is the same stuff used by RSS to claim Guru Nanak was avtaar of Vishnu, just as they claim Buddha was avtaar of Vishnu. This is what hindus want to hear, that Guru Nanak had no special mission and his philosophy was only borrowed from ancient hindu texts and why worship the duplicate copy (Guru Nanak) when you have the original (Vishnu).

    Gautama the first Buddha was an avatar of Vishnu as stated in Choubis Avatar. Guru Nanak Dev Ji however was not an Avatar of Vishnu or any other.

  8. If one was to try to describe even a particle as proof of the unlimited its very nature becomes limited to ones own limitations.

    Wow your a poet and you don't even know it. (Well put by the way!)

    All positive attributions are his, I’m merely the tinkerer who passes them off as my own.

    My existence is proof of his existence, but even existence as a whole can not even claim to know a atom of his existence. Such is his way.

  9. If Parmar was such a big time lion of Punjab what was he doing in Canada as a humble labourer at first who mysteriously became a real-estate tycoon overnight , his mass collateral and assets are still unaccounted for. The truth being that he and his associates were squeezing Canadian Sikh sentiment in order to line their own pockets even his wife made a feeble attempt to send a token amount of money to Punjab knowing full well that it would be seized by the authorities. It’s a known fact that his real estate agent a “Hindu” was told to keep his dealing a secret for two reasons one Parmar didn’t want people knowing he was dealing with a Hindu it wouldn’t look good in his circle, and also he didn’t want people asking questions about where the money was coming from.

    Parmar fled Canada after the authorities wanted to arrest him again. By the way Parmar only entered Punjab to take up the Jethadari after Sukdev Singh Babbar was killed, hardly the actions of a Lion of the Panth.

    If people want to live in a JathaSimSikhi world so be it but keep your romance with Parmar to your own circle and circus and stop trying to bull crap the rest of us.

  10. He stated he built the bombs for Palmer but didn’t know what they were for!

    I would like to ask him for what purpose do people make bombs!?

    People who blindly support him and the likes of Palmer are truly blind consciously and morally. Because of the actions of these few and the ignorance of the Canadian Media, everyone else the rest of us have been tarnished with the same brush and are being associated with terrorists. As usual the actions of a small minority have tarnished the majority.

    People need to wake up

    BTW he lied 27 times under oath , 27 times after swearing to tell the truth by putting his hand on a Gutka!

  11. 25 bullet marks to be preserved

    Written by Times of India, Photo: Aman Sharma

    Sunday, 29 June 2008

    Sikh devotees rest before a wall with the bullet marks inside the complex of the Golden Temple, Sikh's holiest shrine, in Amritsar, India.

    Former Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhk Committee (SGPC) president Kirpal Singh Badungar has censured the central government for lying to Sikhs and the world that no bullet was fired aiming at the sanctum sanctorum of Golden Temple during Operation Bluestar in 1984.

    Talking to The Times of India team on Friday, Badungar said he along with a team of SGPC members and officials had conducted a survey to find out whether there were still bullet marks inside the sanctum sanctorum. "The bullet marks were present even on the saroop of Sri Guru Granth Sahib which was now in toshakhana (treasury)", he said and added that the then ragi Avtar Singh was also shot dead. He said all these findings belie the government's claims.

    The bridge and stone of darshani deori, right and left side of room earmarked for the booking of akhand path , stairs of Sikh museum, pillars of Gurdwara Shaheed Bunga, langar deori, stairs of aata mandi deori were the other places where bullet marks were present, Badungar said.

    SGPC president Avtar Singh Makkar had constituted a committee to preserve the memories related to Sikh world.

  12. 1)why cut it?

    2)Did God make a mistake when he made you?

    I’m not advocating the keeping of hair or cutting it etc that’s up to people to decide, but you really need to be careful with that last question because it will totally debunk you if answered by a logical person.

    Just to Say The Human Body is not designed perfectly nor was it meant to be, just think about it.

  13. I bow to the Thakhat and its creator Maharaj HarGobind Ji but not the clowns who run it now nor the masses that follow their show.

    Your statement is in-complete. Please allow me to complete it. It goes as....... " and i also don't follow the injuction of the writer of Dasam Garanth Guru Gobind Singh jee that 'sab sikhan ko hukam hai guru maneyo granth' " Simple as that !!

    I never said I don’t consider Guru Granth Sahib ji as Guru, if you bother to read what’s been stated I said The Dasam Guru Granth is also my Guru.

    It would appear your analysis is somewhat incomplete.

    By the way In-complete actually means fashionable group: a small, fashionable, and exclusive or influential group, especially one that others want to be part of because of its prestige. Its different to incomplete as in unfinished.

  14. “Mehadeen (Mohammed) was made king of Arabia, He circumcised the kings as a mark of his new religion, He spread his own name instead of the true lords”

    Sri Guru Dasam Granth Maharaj.

    There is only one guru, guru granth sahib jee.

    The Dasam Granth is also my Guru.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use