qwerty

kirtan links of bhai buta singh doing kirtan:

Your right though noorsingh, some people find it stressfull to look at others spirituality. It funny though, these nindaks try so hard to prove their point and put Dhadrianwale down but it just doesn't work out, they just end up going in circles and squares and triangles haha!

'bsgill' what you are saying is 100% true and we all know that. Its just that SOME people like to point fingers at our parcharaks. Some do this straight and others come from slightly twisted views.

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I agree with you veerji, only jealous cuz sangat doesn't give them cars, or as much satkaar.

Dumb people keep doing nindya GGGGRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!! Stupid People!

Why don't you 'm16' go and sell your computer and donate the money to the poor, if your sooooo concerned about this issue, donate your house as well and your clothes, what about family, yeah and donate your shoes and sock as well. don't forget your duvet and any pillows you might have. Go and get a life! So true!! :D :D :D

Yes I see your point 100% but I'm unable to go in to more deatils because of the fact that solicitors have been instructed to lodge an action against the police and the complianents who where involed in the case for the reasons stated before. The reason for posting the second report (Woman cleared of theft from temple) via the disscussion boards is that the webmaster seems reluctant to post it in the news section, its logical to assume you would want to post a follow up to an article which ends "the case continues" unless the webmasters/site owners intention is to infer guilt on the person named even though the case was thrown out. I sincerly hope that isnt the case as the laws of slander and liable apply equally to information posted on the web.

You seem to have the wrong end of the stick here, all I can say is that they that the boys side mother said she had this money to to pay for wedding expenses since when have the boys side paid for wedding expenses & i maybe living in a time warp but all the weddings Ive been involed with the men dealt with the money side of things I wish I could tell you more but I know that solicitors have been instructed to take action against both the complianents and police regarding what was described in court as "doctored / tampered video tapes"

An excerpt from: ic Coventry Woman cleared of theft from temple Sep 22 2004 A woman accused of stealing at a Coventry temple was found not guilty after the court heard video evidence was unreliable. The trial of Rashpal Bharath, 28, of Barton Road, Foleshill, Coventry, ended yesterday, when Judge James Pyke ordered a jury at Coventry Crown Court to find her not guilty of two counts of theft. It had been alleged she took more than £3,000 from a wed-ding at the Guru Nanak Parkash temple in Harnall Lane West, Foleshill, more than a year ago. But the 14-month old case was thrown out when it became apparent the court had just 15 minutes of three hours of video footage. Peter Cooper defending said: "I'm greatly concerned by the omission from the copies provided to the defence. "It must have been apparent to the case officer that this was not original footage, not complete footage, and not proper for the purposes of court." Judge Pyke said: "This case is more than in a mess." For the full original article http://iccoventry.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news...ll&siteid=50003