Jump to content

chhokaranwala

Members
  • Posts

    77
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chhokaranwala

  1. the truth is that most Sikhs of today are but a faint shadow of the past soormas

    mabye this is because of the uncomfortable fact that probably about 80% of todsys Sikhs only became Sikh when it was protifable to do so - ie under the British and without real faith for the teachings of the Gurus

    instead they try and make up for their inadequacies by becoming petty haters and looking for conspiracy theories to cover their own weaknesses rather than face the world with honour and bravery

  2. In Punjab they are working in full force

    Indeed even in the holy city of Amritsar you will see people looking like Sikhs (full beard/turban etc) wearing a cross or upon questioning identifying themselves as Christians

    The problem is even worse in the Jalandhar Doab area where is is fast snowballing into a potential major crisis for the Sikh panth in the future

    Instead of wasting time on pointless arguements and debates the Sikh leadership should be working to inculcate values and morality amongst the population

  3. I agree

    we have to be very careful to establish the genuine from the fake

    we also have to have confidence like in our past that the light of Sikhi will automatically attract the kind of people that are attracted to the teachings of the Gurus

    after all Punjab has always been the lad of sants and fakirs and the Sikhs never felt threatened before becuase of the proud self confidence of our forbears

  4. a rambling post so typical of many brothers these days

    what happened to the open hearted brave Sikhs of the past ?

    are we just lost in self pity ?

    what has happened to the ability to look at ourslees critically instead of looking to blame all an sundry for the problems affecting our community - Why is it always somone elses fault ?

    the Sirsa clown is a speck of dust and yet some brothers cant seem to identify themelves as Sikhs unless they hae someone to hate

  5. just becuase some rituals are followed by the sevadars at the Gurudwara does not automatically give someone the right to label them as 'brahmin' practices

    once again the scapegoat mentality which dominates more and more young Sikh brothers these days

    just a sad refelction of people being 'Not Hindus' as opposed to being Sikh

    Being Sikh should be enough for any follower of the Gurus and such paranoia and weakness will only lead to the fall of many Sikhs in the future to a racist talibanised dharma the very same our Gurus fought against

  6. For Sikhs Ravidasji is a Bhagat

    for his followers he is a Guru

    there should be no problem with that

    The Kabirpanthis refer to Bhagat Kabir as their Guru and declare themselves as Hindus -

    Our path should be the one laid down by the Gurus and to insist and enforce our beleifs on others is not the Sikh way

  7. a true Sikh should not shy away from any house of God - whether Gurudwara, Dharmsala, Mandir, Mosque or Church

    we are slowly developing the same mentality that Guruji fought against

    we are slowly losing that freedom of thought and spirit which is the cornerstone of Sikhi

    How many Sikh brothers and sisters bow without the slightest knowledge before the Guru Granth Sahib - it is the devotion in our hearts that is important and that can be found anywhere if our minds are focused on Akal Purakh

  8. history is not black and white

    many of the Sikhs Misls also ruled territory by applying Rakhi - which in essence is a form of blackmail - ie you pay or die

    we had also become chronically divided before the rise of Ranjit Singh and were as busy bashing each other as any enemies and some were committing all sorts of evil deeds - It took a powerhouse like Ranjit Singh to discpline them. Even then its interesting to note that the Sikh Rajahs like Patiala and Nabha never joined the Sikh Empire - first dilly dallying with the Marathas and then with the British

    in 1785 the Sikhs of the Malwa Misls signed a treaty with the Maratha Mahadji Sindhia who was then ruling Delhi

    like I said I cant understand people who want to diss others for the sake of feeling better about themselves - that is not the Sikh way

  9. your right bro - but we should be the last people to be involved in distorting it even more - even if its to settle with the RSS

    The Marathas had a more or less seperate history from the Sikhs but at the same time to get back to the point of the topic starter their acheivements do not take away from Sikh acheivements and we dont need to be distroting history ourselves

    they had some great leaders like Shivaji their founder and then Baji Rao who broke a very large section of the Mughal Empire in the 1730 s . even at the end they had people like Mahadji Sindhia who after the Battle of Panipat brought the Marathas back to Delhi and even had a treaty with some Sikh leaders. It was after he died that the Marathas went into civil war and allowed the British to step in.

    I dont think they even used the word Dravidans in thoese days by the way - so your assumption that they went on pogroms against them is a little unsound - indeed apart from Maharashtra itself most of their empire was based in what was called Hindustan in those days.

    Did you know that there were some groups of Sikhs who were actually in the Maratha amy in the Second Anglo Maratha war of 1803

    The Sikhs were less concerned with Delhi as our focus was more around Amritsar and Lahore where the most powerful Misls were centered - remember Punjab was a lot bigger in those days and Lahore was a huge city

  10. 'racist forerunner of the KKK' :gg: ?

    Im not sure what connection you can make between a regional/tribal army to the modern day RSS - sorry to offend you but thats taking things just a little bit too far for me -

    They used to call themselves Deccanis as opposed to Hindustanis by the way - The Battle of Wadgoan was a big blow to British prestige - and the first Anglo Maratha war produced no real winners - intereseting to note that the British waited almost thirty years after this war and after the Marathas has nearly three years of civil war before beginning the Second Anglo Maratha war

    Many of the early Misls also ran on the 'rakhi' system - it had nothing to to do racism or hate but just the way warrior groups used to operate in that day

    As far as I see it there was as much coperaration with the Marathas as well as conflict - it was a time of the survival of the fittest and before the rise of Maharaja Ranjit Singh some Sikhs even used to fight each other - I mean look at people like the Rajahs of Patiala _ although they were part of the Khalsa Panth they were always up to no good even allying with the British against the Sikh Empire

    Luckily people like that are a virtual footnote in Sikh history and only the true warriors and shaheeds are remembered like Baba Deep Singh and Hari Singh Nalwa

  11. the truth does not impact on Sikh acheivement - we still defeated one of the most formindable armies in the world at that time

    but we dont need to hate on others to prove anything - The Marathas expanded their empire - came to Punjab for a while and then got defeated by the Afghans - they came back some years later and then lost their empire to the British

    Timur Shah Abdali lost to them in around 1757

    http://www.afghanland.com/history/ahmadshah.html

    They also fought with the British in three wars

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo_Maratha_Wars

    they also beat the British in the Battle of Wadgaon

    http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=113693

    none of this takes away from the glory established by Maharaja ranjit Singh who not only secured Punjab from invasion and brought peace to it but also brought the fanatical Afgans into line

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranjit_Singh

    these are the same people who the combined might of USA and UK today is struggling to control and yet the Maharaja managed to bring these people to heel

  12. The Marathas and Sikhs were never really rivals for power in Punjab and Delhi

    the Marathas were in Punjab in the 1750's at a time when the Misldars were consolodating power and they actually acted in unison . they were granted the revenue of Punjab by what was left of the Mughals at this time and worked in unison with Adina Beg of Punjab . the Sikhs were with them when they took Sarhind and then Lahore and when some bands of Marathas chased Timur Shah Abdali towards Peshawar

    They also had many points of valour in their history as well and until the Battle of Panipat gave the Afghans a real scare. even after this battle they returned to Delhi a few years later where they remained until the British turned up. They were actually outnumbered in the Battle of Panipat and depiste losing managed to kill quite a large number of Afghans - they were helped before the battle by Maharaja Ala Singh of Patiala

    in the meantime they had a rocky relationship with the Misls of the Patiala and Malwa region

    They also beat the Portuguese in western India in the 1730's

    in any event their field of action was different from the Sikh warriors - The Sikh warriors were maninly focused in libverating Punjab and the adjoiing areas and fighting the great war with the fanatical Afghans - eventually making the proud Durannis bow before the might of Maharaja Ranjit Singh

  13. it is not in the Sikh spirit to demean others

    in the past Punjabi Sikh ballads would sing of all brave warriors even not from our area or religion like the ones about Jaimal and Fatta the Rajasthanis who fought to the death against the Mughals or Dulla Bhatti (Muslim) who fought against the emperor Akbar

    Some interseting facts - in the seventh century it was the Rajput Kingdoms who defeated the Arabs under their king Bappa Rawal

    that it was Chandragupta Maurya who defeated the Greeks in India

    its was Skanda Gupta who defeated the Huns

    Babur referred to Krishnadeva Raya of Vijaynagar as the greatest and most powerful king in India

    that it was Baji Rao who led the Marathas to conquer more than half of India in the 1730s and 1740s

    that it was Rana Pratap who kept fighting with the Mughals and whose clan never really gave up the struggle

    and the greatest of acheivements by the Sikhs who broke the back of the Afghans and chased them back to their mountains with the power of the sword and dharma and marched against the Chinese Empire and gave the British empire a bloody nose

    we dont need to hate on others to be proud to be who we are - there is more than enough in our history

  14. to be a Sikh is not to be afraid of the truth

    we dont have to put down any other religion to feel better about ourselves - there is enough in Sikh history regardless

    the truth is that the Muslims were on a conversion agenda for centuries but ongoing resistance put them off - we just have to look at how they hated and hunted the Sikhs at a later time

    If you read William Durant he reckons that almost 100,000 Muslims warriors had to immigrate to India every so oftern in order to cover their losses in wars and battles

    remember it was India that blocked the Arab advance in the east

    and by the way Ahmad Shah Abdali was opposed by a whole host of people

    he first was defeated by the remants of the Mughals in 1754, then he had a seasaw wars with the Marathas with both sides pushing back and forth from Delhi to Peshwar from 1756 to 1761 - he fought a huge battle with outisde the city of Mathura with thousands fighting to defend their holy city. He had another battle with sadhus at the Hindu town of Gokul in 1759. in between he assualted the Darbar Sahib and shaheeds like Baba Deep Singh gave their heads for dharma

    if you note that by the time the British came around there were hardly any Muslims kingdoms around

    these things dont dim my respect for the Sikh warriors but only increases them - a lot of Sikh brothers want to dismiss anything non Sikh but the truth about the Sikhs is even greater without trying any tricks

  15. interesting points traveller bro

    I personally thought it would help me learn more about my faith if I understood the time Guru Nanakdevji came to earth

    after all the christians know all the history around Jesus and Romans etc, and the same with the Muslims and Muhammad

    then with our people they live among such prejudices and hatreds its hard to sift the truth behind what really happened

    personally my respect for Guru Nanak has only increased knowing the violent and dangerous climate in which her was born

    can u imagine preaching what he preached at a time when Hindu and Muslims in all parts of India were killing each other by the truckload ?

    there were Muslim kings who would kill you just for saying that all religions are equal

    there were Hindu warriors who would kill you over a scrap of land

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use