Jump to content

BenaresKaThug

Members
  • Posts

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by BenaresKaThug

  1. Sant Brahmgyani Kilewale ji didnot create the new Sect or Panth(Neeldhari).

    Neeldharis are follwoing the same rehat of Dasam Patshahi. It is also Nihang sngh or Bhujangi Bana;- Wearing of Chakuta, Kamarkasa,Kanga,Kachera,Kes.....so on.

    They are not wearing Shasters because Sanagat was told that Now the time is to hold Simrana(Rosary) and do naam Jap; Time in future would come to hold shasters and fight(Degh Tegh Jag mein Dhuoon Chale).

    If son(Sant and Mahapursh) is getting the respect infront of the Father(SGGSji) means the respect of the father in the other way. Neeldhari name just originated from the sangat becuase of Wearing Neela Bana but it is not not seperate sect. Nor any of the Sants in Neeldhari proclaimed self Guru; instead they bow to Dhan Dhan SGGSji.

    The Neeldhari Panth is a group within the sikhi which was founded by babaj Harnam Singh Ji (Kile Wale) in the year 1966.

    If there following the same rehat of Dasam Patshahi wheres there shasters, who told them that in the future they will hold shasters and that now its only to hold simrana.

    If you use the same logic i guess there was no problem of baba kham singh Sanatan Singh Sabha wala wanting to be bowed down to in front of Sri Guru Granth Sahib, because he should get respect infront of the father.

  2. Why would Baba Harnam Singh create a Neeldhari Panth, this is confusing the Sikhs by adding more sects within Sikhi. I have listened to alot of kathas of the present head they are good but why did they create a different panth and different bana. They should wear the 5ks and do parchar of Sikhi instead of there own sect.

    I have no problem of satkar for mahapurkhs but no one should bow down to a self proclaimed sant in front of Sri Guru Granth Sahib no matter how big he is.

    heres a video that might give more information

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuuxHlNjb0w&feature=related

  3. I heard that audio. Based on the audio he says:

    1) Banda Singh Bahadur was anti-DG

    2) Guru Gobind Singh Ji never gave Guruship to Guru Granth Sahib Ji

    3) Says Bhai Kahan Singh Nabha was snatan and is root for anti-DG thought in the present times

    I also heard another audio from him where he says if you don't want to eat meat, leave Sikhism.

    He also says in another audio that it is wrong to call Guru Nanak Guru. He is basically pro-DG version of Spokesman.

    please provide the video that Nihang Ji says that Guru Nanak should not be called Guru, i want to listen to that.

    Also where he says that Guru Gobind Singh Ji didn't give Guruship to Guru Granth Sahib Ji.

  4. I can't remember if i read this in a book or listened to it in a katha. It said that Giani Ditt Singh was asked to be in the committee that met and wrote the Faridkota wala teeka, he met the pundits and gianis but that when he found that they were putting hindu ideas into the teeka he left and didn't want to be part of the translation team.

    Does anyone know more about this event. Which book or anything that mentions this event or is this a made up event.

  5. May be you should know that Dasam Granth sahib used to be in parkash at all takhats  including akal takhat sahib .

    Two takhats still continue to follow old maryada. So please read history. That will give you a lot of information instead

    of putting such questions here.

    Did you read what i said,

    I said my point is to say why is it taking so long to get Sri Dasam Granth, into our gurdwara, maybe we should ask our committies to do praskash in gurdwara.

    where did i mention that they need to be parkash in takhats.  I already know that they are parkash in two of the takhats.

    First of all I believe in Sri Dasam Granth Sahib.  Let me repeat my question since your not understanding it.  Im saying why is it taking long for Sri Dasam Granth and Sri Sarbloh Granth to be installed in every Gurdwaras.

    Like your local Gurdwaras and in other countries.

     

  6. Dear Sangat Ji

    I want to get a book on the sikh's history that is supported by the panth and is supported by many scholars.

    can anyone recommand one

    because every time i quote one event from a sikh history book someone will say the author is RSS or missionary or something else.

    what does the Sangat think of Max Arthur Macualiffe 6 volume work i read it and find it good

    Please recommad that is the most accurate old or new Thanks. 

  7. Everytime a katha or keertan cd is out or a baba is coming to do katha.  He always seems to have a big title infront of there name.

    and as for the gurbani quote above i hope you don't think im slandering any sants, because its just a question i had.  But i think we

    need to be watchful when someone without jap or tap is having such titles infront of there names.  Also who gives these titles out

    anyways. 

  8. Sangat Ji

    this question about Sants has been bothering me for a long time,

    I believe there are Sants or Saints but it seems to me that any

    one these days is putting that title in front of there name.

    All true Sants wouldn't announce that they have met God. But

    I think they will show it through there works and deeds. So

    am i wrong in thinking that maybe all these people who put

    Sant in front of there names are fake. What happened to Bhai

    and Baba.

    Why do people accept these people who put big titles in front

    of there names like Sri Maan 108 1008 bramgiani and others, are

    they not taking respect from Guru Sahib and transfering it to

    himself.

    I think the title Sant should be given out by the Takhts like when

    we honer very great Sikhs who have done great seva, we give them the

    title Bhia Sahib.

    So am i wrong in thinking we should discourage people from calling

    themselves Sant.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use