shastarSingh

4 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Surrinder Singh Sodhi was a Kharku Singh though?

Culture of Sodhis is different from bhappaas.

Secondly there must be some good kind hearted individuals in bhappaas too.

Bhappaas as a community is dangerous lol

24 minutes ago, Ranjeet01 said:

They use the Sikhi line with you when you conduct any business with you expecting you to concede, but they will not budge an inch on their position.

 

The worst thing about bhappaas is they break your trust.

A sikh shud never break trust of another sikh.

Trust once broken can never be fixed again.

At present we are under Indian rule. That's why bhappaas hv controlled some panthic organizations.

In future when we will hv Kharrku rule, these bhappaas will automatically give up their control of the panthic organizations and will become totally obedient to Kharrku Singhs.

5 minutes ago, ipledgeblue said:

clearly mentions 5 patta maryada in the video you posted here
 

 

just learnt a new bachan from Guru Gobind Singh, this time using the Jatt word too:

"eh jatt affreya firda hai
chotti jee gal wee apni tidd wich nahi pacha sakeya!"

I m great fan of 5 patte vaali shaheedi degh.

If all humans drink it in morning and evening, doctors and pharmaceutical companies will be out of work and might start committing suicides.

3 minutes ago, Redoptics said:

Why would you even want one as a pet, where you going to keep it ? In a bird cage ? I would question,  why you want one in the first place. 

Guru Sahib kept baaz.

Dal panth to this day keeps baaz.

We hv a history of keeping baaz.

Dasmesh Pita ji is called baazaan valaa.

1 hour ago, shastarSingh said:

Sikhs hv been keeping baaz from Guru Hargobind Sahib jee's time.

But baaz is a strictly carnivorous.

Can vegetarian Sikhs keep baaz as a pet?

Dallysingh veerji

Premi veerji

And other intelligent Sangat ji

Plz give ur opinion

Dallysingh veerji

What do you say of the above video?

13 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

It might be that we prune dead branches off first? People that aren't obviously remotely interested in their Sikh heritage and are willing to sell out to outsiders for jobs/positions. Or janania that continue to act like randheean with men of other communities (who obviously hate Sikhs), no matter what you tell them. Maybe it's time we sent these types packing?

 

How many leaves do they use i.e. per person? 

It is great sin to do mukhbari of Guru Sahib and His Singhs.

4 hours ago, GurjantGnostic said:

Leaf just isn't remotely strong enough to do that bro. Agree to disagree. 

From my experience, what you're going to find is no supposed fixed amount is going to prevent alcohol or afeem from becoming an addiction, while there's essentially no limit to the number of leaves you can do whatever with, it's just never going to do anything resembling an addiction to you. People do become habituated to it, but that's not the same thing. 

Especially sticking to the count we've come across in Purtan sources with the collaborative associated effects of the other ingredients in Bhang. 

I agree cannabis is not addictive like alcohol and afeem. I agree leaves hv less nashaa. But still there has to be some limit.

A nihang told me that he started with 5 leaves and now has reached 50 leaves.

That's too much intoxication.

5 hours ago, dallysingh101 said:

It might be that we prune dead branches off first? People that aren't obviously remotely interested in their Sikh heritage and are willing to sell out to outsiders for jobs/positions. Or janania that continue to act like randheean with men of other communities (who obviously hate Sikhs), no matter what you tell them. Maybe it's time we sent these types packing?

 

How many leaves do they use i.e. per person? 

No fixed amount. That's why many hv become bhang addicts sadly.

15 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

Are Sikh Khatris not similar to Hindu Khatris ?

I hv met a lot of urban Hindus in my life. May be many of them were Khatris. I didn't notice bhappaa behaviour in them.

May be Hindu aroras might hv cultural similarities with arora bhappaas.

14 minutes ago, proudkaur21 said:

also these delhi sikhs dont have much respect for sikhi and marry their daughters off to men of other religions. I have noticed this so many times. These rich delhi sikhs will marry their daughters off to rich hindus and stuff like this. They care about money more than religion. Its 100% true in punjabi cities as well. In the villages of punjab atleast most sikhs marry other sikhs.

Another thing about bhappaas is they are pretty honest while doing business with each other.

But they do dishonesty while doing business with non bhappaa Sikhs.

6 minutes ago, ipledgeblue said:

sikhi not Sikhi"ism" 

Yes sikhi

10 minutes ago, proactive said:

The money grabbing reputation that Sikhs have got among non-Sikhs is due to Bhappas in the cities across India. The first time that the people at the Delhi borders got to know true Sikhi was when the farmers set up camps there. Before that the only Sikhs they had experience of were tight fisted Bhappas. There are over 600,000 Sikhs in Delhi, if a few thousand Sikh  farmers could  have such a deep and positive impact on the people around Delhi then why haven't 600,000 Sikhs in Delhi not had a positive impact on the non-Sikhs of Delhi. This is something to think about. It's all very well to give out langar in the Gurdwara but then when these non-Sikhs experience the Bhappas in their daily lives then any positive impact of the Gurdwara is quickly undone. 

Veerji 

I studied in a college in delhi. I was told many times by fellow Hindu students that "your Delhi sikh girls are so easily available".

I felt so ashamed.

3 minutes ago, shastarSingh said:

Its not casteist. It's a cultural thing. I m from jatt family but I never say anything bad about saini, kamboh,ramgariye or chamaar brothers but I hv had very bad experiences with bhappaas.

In fact I had better experience with Hindus and Muslims in delhi than bhappaas.

They are very sweet on face and you never know their inner real intentions.

Bhappaas feel they are the most sophisticated Sikhs compared to rural background Sikhs.

Bhappaas also feel that all gurdwaras belong to them because all Guru Sahibaan were Khatri.

Bhappaas are masters of doing ustat.

They will control a panthic organization, install a bhappaa as its Jathedaar and then do so much ustat of their bhappaa Jathedaar as if he is even greater than Waheguru ji.

59 minutes ago, Premi5 said:

sounds a little 'casteist'

Its not casteist. It's a cultural thing. I m from jatt family but I never say anything bad about saini, kamboh,ramgariye or chamaar brothers but I hv had very bad experiences with bhappaas.

In fact I had better experience with Hindus and Muslims in delhi than bhappaas.

Bhappaas are very sweet on face and you never know their inner real intentions.

Bhappaas feel they are the most sophisticated Sikhs compared to rural background Sikhs.

Bhappaas also feel that all gurdwaras belong to them because all Guru Sahibaan were Khatri.

2 hours ago, ipledgeblue said:

However Singhs/sikhs within Nirmala sampradaiye are also scholars and teachers of Santhiya, and some Sants come from this sampradaiye as well, and Nirmala sikhs would welcome Gobind Gita and prachar. 

Scholarism of nirmalas is still useful to panth. But they hv become too hinduized.

In 18th century, nirmalas converted Hindus into Sikhism. They studied the Vedic and puranic literature and convinced Hindus that Gurmat is the greatest and complete truth.

These days they are doing the opposite. They are doing parchar of Vedic philosophy and Vedanta on Sikhs.