KhoonKaBadlaKhoon

Lmao. How about start with trying to get a Sikh into cabinet first?

5 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

I would agree, but much of the conversation here is about Khalistan which I take as being a theocracy by definition rather than a pluralistic democracy? I suppose in my own experience I don't see much support on the ground in panjab for Khalistan? Or for it to become a independent state. 

I agree, I think the support really sparks up when something happens related to politics etc. Other than that they're just too busy caught up in life too really commit too such a complex goal that has zero structure. Can't blame them. Or expect them too rise up because a bunch of people thousands of miles away have fantasies about a Sikh state that they won't even go live in. 

46 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

Yeah possibly but then a Sikh theocratic state may not be what they want so I reckon that's a understandable.? Currently even the majority of Sikhs in panjab don't want a independent theocratic state? 

I doubt a theocratic state would go over well in Punjab. But a seperate state for Sikhs to operate freely, that could. But in terms of people against or for, no one knows exact figures. I think the vast majority isn't against or for it, they're just content where they are. 

There is nothing to indicate that EVERY single decision was made by ISI. Did they have some influence, sure? I agree with a good bit of what MisterSingh says, but a lot of it comes off as typical Indian white washing. They want everyone to believe Khalistan was nothing, just some misguided fools being used by Pakistan. That's it. Final. Which I do not agree with it. Lots of mistakes were bad, but that Shaheeds like Sant Ji, Baba Manochahal, Budhinghwala were just dumbf***s getting used? No. 

And the 84 Pakistan invasion theory, I have heard this from ONE Sikh who was there present. Mostly comes from Indian puppets though. Although I am not dismissing it entirely as an Indian spread theory. 

Some good points made in this thread, from all sides, but comparing Thatcher to Hitler etc? Really? It's because of ridiculous statements like this no one really takes Sikhs serious. The loudest Sikh voices often use little logic, instead it's all emotion. 

On 2017-6-7 at 10:18 AM, singhbj singh said:

Article was written by a Canadian not Indian writer.

Gurpreet Singh is a Canada- based journalist who publishes Radical Desi- a monthly magazine that covers alternative politics.

Hes a piece of <banned word filter activated>. Gurpreet. 

And I don't think the new generation dislikes Sant Ji, seems like the opposite. You see all the memrobilia on cars etc now?

#PrayForLondon

There, I've done my part. Now sit back and see which city is next?

Nothing but sympathy for the 13 year old, she's a mere child still. But these uni aged girls that willingly enter relationships with Muslims, despite knowing what happens across UK? Not so much sympathy. I bet many of them are also the same liberal Sikh girls promoting unity and anti Islamophobia all over social media. 

5 hours ago, Jacfsing2 said:

It's been happening for a while, they used to at least be hidden about it, now it's not hidden at all.

5 hours ago, jkvlondon said:

every mainstream propaganda fed sikh/hindu/muslim/gora says things like that especially these days

Let me get this straight, these people insult you if you believe Guru Granth Sahib Ji? Wow.

56 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

We are sadly at a state with our people that if you say you believe in the 11 Gurus you are called a Fundementalist or a radical Sikh. 

I've never heard of this happening..

On 2017-5-20 at 10:43 AM, Akalifauj said:

This is a great step taken by this Singh.  The Canadians politicians have done nothing for Sikhs by joining major parties.  More damage has been done by watering down Sikhi to bend at the knees for their political party.  They have ruined nagar kirtan by making them into political events and allowing bhangra teams to dance to manmat music.  The respect for Sri Guru Granth Sahib ji has been completely lost at these events.  Its a mela now.  

I agree with the latter part of your post. But, we Canadian Sikhs have everything we need. We don't need our politicians catering to us. There are no battles to be fought. They're there to serve Canadians. 

6 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

The guys a joke 

Why is that? Not from UK, so I know nothing of him. 

Sounds like leftist commie SJW Sikh. 

I agree with the above post, the Gurdwara in OP looks incredibly tacky. 

On 2017-1-7 at 9:43 AM, Jacfsing2 said:

It's impossible to play as Punjab in this game without the use of mods, and spreading the Sikh religion is impossible, (so if someone was going to want a Khalsa Raj on the planet, it would be impossible). Also the Martha Empire wouldn't best represent us since we aren't Hindu. If someone really wanted to play as a Sikh nation in a video game, Daas would recommend Civ 5 where you can actually let Sikhs spread.

Is that what we have come too? Being left to fantasizing about Khalsa Raj in video games? 

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Masands were burnt in the Guru's presence.  Moni's fighting on alcohol is not in comparison to amritdharis standing up for Gurmat.  

3 hours ago, Akalifauj said:

Masands were burnt in the Guru's presence.  Moni's fighting on alcohol is not in comparison to amritdharis standing up for Gurmat.  

Oh really? You're saying most fights in Gurdwaray are  to prevent beadbi etc? Quit the act, you must really think we're a stupid bunch to believe that. Its almost two sides of middle aged men, many if whom are sardar/amritdhari, fighting over control, so they can line their pockets. Now a days neither monay or sardars are better than the others. 

Assuming you're a nihang, your faction of Sikhs are some of the worst lol

1 hour ago, Akalifauj said:

The moni's are at it again.  The moni's will justify this behaviour by making up false history to drag Sikhs in the mud.  

There were Singh's involved too. In fact I believe one is even charged with very serious offences. 

On 2017-5-2 at 9:01 PM, Not2Cool2Argue said:

If we made langar simple almost tasteless, then all the problems will be solved.

Less waste, less OTT chili spices , and less ppl abusing the system cuz food is not that good.  It will be healthier, we can say no mixing of ingredients. Totally ban dairy except in degh and kheer and chah., so vegans, gluten free can eat. Always have rice and daal and kheer and chaah if possible. 

Also only poor ppl will want to eat then those with majboori.

Also we taksalis were always taught that if u eat too much langar its bad. Not only does ur paath n sewa get used up, but u get a share of the dukh of person doing langar. For example if someone did ardaas that my cancer go away and does langar for it, then everyone who ate langar will get small benign tumor. Basically the dukh of that person is shared among the sangat in small parts so it becomes bearable to all. 

However then we were told that this is only rumors, hoe can gurus langar be bad. But i think taksalis r smart. They spread that to stop their students from overeating at langars. Whether true or not, it works.

So spread this everywhere and ppl might stop abusing. Esp send.it to the hindus, with their idols n black magic they should have no problem believing it

 

Doesn't seem like they are that smart if that fall for that ridiculous theory.