KhoonKaBadlaKhoon

6 hours ago, Big_Tera said:

overly groomed feline pu$$ycat

That's golden coming from you. You couldn't even defend yourself when you got verbally attacked by your co-workers. Put your head down and walked home like a "feline pu$$ycat" to vent on this forum. 

2 hours ago, InderjitS said:

Gravesend used to have the largest population of Sikhs, dunno if this is still the case. 

Isn't Gravesend just outside of London? Or part of the general London area? Not familiar with UK geography. 

For dsinghdp, the biggest thing is that in Canada and UK Sikhs have density. Sikhs in US are a lot more spread. They'll have 5000 Sikhs spread across Houston metropolitan (example), whereas Calgary (example) will have 5000 in one neighborhood. That neighborhood becomes a Sikh area, Houston becomes a "sizeable Sikh community." 

4 hours ago, SoulSingh said:

There are strong groups in the valley and coast. I don't see that many in LA, but I may have gone to the wrong parts.

There isn't a recognizable Sikh community in LA. California Sikh communities are in Yuba City, Union City, Fresno, Turlock etc. And smaller communities like Kerman and Livingston. Then in Washington you have Sikhs in Renton, Kent etc. 

Small communities in Indianapolis, Colorado, Pennsylvania etc. 

Only other large recognizable community are Long Island, Queens, parts of NJ.

On 02/10/2017 at 9:52 AM, Dsinghdp said:

Wow that's more areas than the UK. America is a big country. I have relatives in California.

May look like a lot, but like the o.p said they're small clusters. Whereas in the UK, Sikhs have actually large communities in the London and Birmingham area. A lot more prominent. 

1 hour ago, S4NGH said:

Was it an attack to kill brar or simply a message to him and india that we haven't forgotten? Brar and the media blew the minor scuffle way out of proportion. I don't think they intended on taking his life... And if they did, Maharaaj has other plans for him...

That makes little to no sense. You have the man who played a huge role in attacking Darbar Sahib in front of you, and you let him walk on purpose? "We haven't forgotten! But we won't do anything about it!" 

16 minutes ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

I don't agree I'm afraid 

Why is that? I think Anand Karaj is quite clear that its meant for two people pledging to grow closer to Waheguru/Gurus. Being a Muslim Hindu etc I don't see how you as a couple could proceed on the the journey of Sikhi together. 

Do share your views, I admittedly do not know too much myself.

1 minute ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

It's reaffirming actually, as to why sikhi is different.. Layman won't understand it.. Tisar panth.. 

May be different, fine and all, but they need to understand interfaith still is a no no. 

4 hours ago, GuestSingh said:

Canada never has and never will belong to the goreh.

Their ancestors/forefathers invaded and stole the land from its native people in the same way of the Native Americans and Australian Aboriginals. Their descendants are now sowing what they reaped while remaining ignorant of history so the thought of sympathy shouldn't even enter the mind, in my opinion.

Perhaps they should've stayed in their caves and let the world prosper on its own because intolerance runs in their blood.

Stole? Its human nature. Throughout history people have been conquering and/or wiping out other people to take their lands. Most of the time, it wasn't by pretty means. Natives weren't able to hold their land and lost, simple. Are we supposed to return every bit of land to the very original inhabitants? 

Someone send this to all those interfaith marriage supporters. Show them how Muslims react. 

I respect that they attempted it, but how did 4 young men fail to kill one frail old man? Something doesn't add up.

2 hours ago, KhalistanYouth said:

Canada, where they vandalized gurduwaras and that one lady who thought Jagmeet Singh of the NDP party was muslim, don't forget about the Racist white kids in Brampton, go to a park and they have racist terms about Indians written on the playgrounds, I heard B.C has it bad with racism where they smashed the windows of  a gurduwara and spray painted anti-muslim terms on the wall, and Ontario is more developed except for that one Hindu-Nationalist guy (who is a big joke), every country has it's up's and down's and Canada is definitely  not a Racist-free zone, bro ever since Islamophobia was on the rise in the U.K, Canadians are following the steps about being Islamophobic and then confusing Sikhs with Muslims, but then again, if you truly wanted to move out of the U.K, I'd suggest a place like Brampton although house prices have been inflated, there is a huge indian majority, the racist white kids calls it "brown town" even Toronto would be good, but beware of the night.

 

Also beware of the Youth, many Canadians consider Sikhs to be criminals, it's like ignorant Americans being scared of black people, except in Canada, the "black people" are also Sikhs.

If you're moving to Canada, message me, and I'll tell you a good area to move to.

But Canada also has it's good side, like big festivals where many Canadians and non-sikhs attend to, Jus Reign being a Canadian Sensation, Jagmeet Singh in politics,  the Canadian Defense Minister, etc

But beware of some of the festivals, the Police usually monitor due to Disputes that occurred in the past, rare to see them happen again, and we also have a motorcycle club "Sikh Riders of Canada" (it's also in America, we need something like that in the U.K to integrate our religion with U.K culture.) 

Pretty sure we also have a Khalsa School here, for young children, and most gurduwaras here have great libraries to learn history, not sure if Gurduwaras in the U.K have libraries. 

One lady who recieved backlash from just about everyone. Gurdwaras vandalized? Maybe in Ontario, haven't heard of such an incident in BC so far. The Punjabis in Brampton aren't angels, if anything, they're probably the bullies. People know who are, I've never been mistaken for a Muslim .

Obviously every country has their problems, but you're exaggerating. Do you even live in Canada? 

7 hours ago, akaltaksal said:

Heretic or a Turk. Both are repulsive. The heretic is an internal threat where as the Turk is external. Whether or not he's insulted the Gurus (as of yet), is not the issue. It's the fact that he's Turk-Beeraj.

Quit it already. Guru Sahibs or Sikhs of the old didn't detest every Muslim, nor do we need too. You're coming off as try hard. Are you just scared of debate??

5 hours ago, Sukhvirk1976 said:

If you have donated to the charity and disagree with their work you should write to them... 

I agree. Clearly people keep donating, dont mind where they're used, and so we can assume no money is being wasted. 

9 hours ago, proactive said:

You have misunderstood my statement. I am not claiming these areas because the Sikhs ruled over them but that Sikhs owned the land. The Turks cannot claim Palestine because it was a part of their empire but the Palestinians can because they owned the land. It's not about rule but land ownership. Sikhs owned 57% of the land in Lahore district, the fact is that the British took the district from the owners and passed it on to the tenants much as in the analogy I gave in the previous post.

Maybe you should tell the Palestinians to move on and lose any hope of recovering their land that the Jews took.

Who decided that in owning the land vs ruling it? Owning trumps ruling. I'd say it's the other way around. If you can't protect and keep the land you own, well it's not really yours anymore. At least in respect to the old days.

6 hours ago, Balkaar said:

I personally think WAAAY too much is made of British 'divide and rule'. The British didn't really cause the divisions which exist in the..... 

Great post. 

1 hour ago, Jacfsing2 said:

Do you have any proof of this? I highly doubt he's said anything remotely related to this. That Sikhs have a right to a nation.

I'm quite sure on his Instagram he has spoken for Sikhs to have their own nation. But, ill revisit his page to double check. One of his close friends is also a known Shaheed from the Sangharsh. 

He fasted for Ramadan? Wow. But, he's quite a broad character. I respect his hardcore pro-Sikhi, Khalistan, and anti-india views. He never backs down. 

Not so big anymore? ? Should have confronted them at least when you quit. Instead you got insulted one last time as you meekly left. 

3 minutes ago, Balkaar said:

Any suggestions then? 

Probably none. It's just easier to complain about what other people are putting THEIR donations towards. 

2 hours ago, S1ngh said:

Sigh! Talking to a wall here. ?‍♂️

I think you just lack reading comprehension, perhaps English isn't your first language. 

14 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

? kirpans = weapon. You just mentioned weapon in unsafe. 

You are confusing yourself. Make up your mind brother on whether kirpan is a weapon or not. Should we have our Khalistan parks states that kirpan, a weapon not be allowed in parks. Yes or no? ?

What lol? Kirpan IS a weapon. Weapons are not unsafe on their own, UNLESS in the hands of a unsafe individual who is willing to cause harm to innocents etc.

It doesn't matter where the theme park aka business is, they set their own policies. Some states in USA allow concealed carry, but businesses in those states still won't allow weapons inside. 

It's really not a difficult concept to understand. Your mind/judgement is clouded and biased because we are discussing Sikhs.

15 minutes ago, S1ngh said:

I believe our brother here is going thru some disgruntled phase in his life. Taking discussion from declaring kirpan as unsafe weapon which not to be allowed in theme parks to men dancing in water parks in underwear. ?‍♂️

Not at all, it was a reply to Jacfsing discussing theme parks in Punjab. I just had a chance to take a shot at Indian theme parks. 

And no where did I say Kirpans are unsafe, no weapon is unsafe, it all depends on who is holding the weapon. And, unfortunately theme park security can't accurately judge who is safe or not after a 10 second pat down. Let's use some logic, shall we?

28 minutes ago, Jacfsing2 said:

I believe I already said, "Live and Let Live". Homosexuals just shouldn't bring it up, and we all can pretend nothing is going on behind closed doors.

Makes it easier for everyone if people kept their fetishes to themselves.

Dhan Dhan Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji is the light of Vaheguru, it's not really that confusing. If people are confused about Angs and Shabads, they can confirm with Punj Pyare, who'll play an active role is said Khalistan/"Sikh-land", (term I made-up, to ensure that this isn't some secular land). 

But the best part about Khalistan after Guru Sahib owning such land is that there will be no more SGPC rigging systems.

Don't quite think it's a fetish. "Let's just pretend they don't exist," is a quite a childish concept. One step above criminalizing it. 

Well, I mean there are already countless things we can't agree on, I have no doubt people would disagree on this as well. Nor do I think a theocracy would end well. It'd be much easier to create a constitution based on Sikh values. A secular government incorporating the great Sikh values we have.